eEcoLiDAR, eScience infrastructure for ecological applications of LiDAR point clouds: reconstructing the 3D ecosystem structure for animals at regional to continental scales

The lack of high-resolution measurements of 3D ecosystem structure across broad spatial extents impedes major advancements in animal ecology and biodiversity science. We aim to fill this gap by using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology to characterize the vertical and horizontal complexity of vegetation and landscapes at high resolution across regional to continental scales. The newly LiDAR-derived 3D ecosystem structures will be applied in species distribution models for breeding birds in forests and marshlands, for insect pollinators in agricultural landscapes, and songbirds at stopover sites during migration. This will allow novel insights into the hierarchical structure of animal-habitat associations, into why animal populations decline, and how they respond to habitat fragmentation and ongoing land use change. The processing of these massive amounts of LiDAR point cloud data will be achieved by developing a generic interactive eScience environment with multi-scale object-based image analysis (OBIA) and interpretation of LiDAR point clouds, including data storage, scalable computing, tools for machine learning and visualisation (feature selection, annotation/segmentation, object classification, and evaluation), and a PostGIS spatial database. The classified objects will include trees, forests, vegetation strata, edges, bushes, hedges, reedbeds etc. with their related metrics, attributes and summary statistics (e.g. vegetation openness, height, density, vertical biomass distribution etc.). The newly developed eScience tools and data will be available to other disciplines and applications in ecology and the Earth sciences, thereby achieving high impact. The project will foster new multi-disciplinary collaborations between ecologists and eScientists and contribute to training a new generation of geo-ecologists.

[1]  Anna F. Cord,et al.  Linking earth observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives , 2016 .

[2]  Andreas Huth,et al.  The extent of edge effects in fragmented landscapes: Insights from satellite measurements of tree cover , 2016 .

[3]  Veronika Braunisch,et al.  Environmental predictors of species richness in forest landscapes: abiotic factors versus vegetation structure , 2016 .

[4]  Francisco Vilar Brasileiro,et al.  A Science Gateway for Biodiversity and Climate Change Research , 2016, IWSG.

[5]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  Functional traits help to explain half-century long shifts in pollinator distributions , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Kyle M. Brown,et al.  Progress in operational flood mapping using satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data , 2016 .

[7]  Hongjie Xie,et al.  LiDAR-Based Solar Mapping for Distributed Solar Plant Design and Grid Integration in San Antonio, Texas , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Eirik Malnes,et al.  Remote sensing of snow avalanches: recent advances, potential, and limitations , 2016 .

[9]  M. Collins,et al.  Integrated radar and lidar analysis reveals extensive loss of remaining intact forest on Sumatra 2007–2010 , 2015 .

[10]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Susceptibility of pollinators to ongoing landscape changes depends on landscape history , 2015 .

[11]  Gang Chen,et al.  Identification of Forested Landslides Using LiDar Data, Object-based Image Analysis, and Machine Learning Algorithms , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[12]  C. A. Mücher,et al.  Environmental science: Agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space , 2015, Nature.

[13]  Graziano Pesole,et al.  Towards global interoperability for supporting biodiversity research on essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) , 2015 .

[14]  Peter van Oosterom,et al.  Massive point cloud data management: Design, implementation and execution of a point cloud benchmark , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[15]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction , 2015, Science Advances.

[16]  Ben Collen,et al.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity , 2015, Nature.

[17]  G. Vosselman,et al.  SEGMENTATION OF UAV-BASED IMAGES INCORPORATING 3D POINT CLOUD INFORMATION , 2015 .

[18]  Norman Kerle,et al.  3D object-oriented image analysis in 3D geophysical modelling: Analysing the central part of the East African Rift System , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[19]  Gregory P Asner,et al.  Advances in animal ecology from 3D-LiDAR ecosystem mapping. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Xiangyun Hu,et al.  Object-Based Analysis of Airborne LiDAR Data for Building Change Detection , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[21]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  An efficient, multi-layered crown delineation algorithm for mapping individual tree structure across multiple ecosystems , 2014 .

[22]  Hidde Leijnse,et al.  Continental-scale radar monitoring of the aerial movements of animals , 2014, Movement Ecology.

[23]  Linhai Jing,et al.  Improving the efficiency and accuracy of individual tree crown delineation from high-density LiDAR data , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[24]  Miska Luoto,et al.  Testing species distribution models across space and time: high latitude butterflies and recent warming , 2013 .

[25]  Veronika Braunisch,et al.  Remotely sensed forest structural complexity predicts multi species occurrence at the landscape scale , 2013 .

[26]  Wenkai Li,et al.  Delineating Individual Trees from Lidar Data: A Comparison of Vector- and Raster-based Segmentation Approaches , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Local forest structure, climate and human disturbance determine regional distribution of boreal bird species richness in Alberta, Canada , 2013 .

[28]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[29]  C. Kremen,et al.  Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Zoltan-Csaba Marton,et al.  Tutorial: Point Cloud Library: Three-Dimensional Object Recognition and 6 DOF Pose Estimation , 2012, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[31]  R. Didham,et al.  Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes ‐ eight hypotheses , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[32]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[33]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review , 2012 .

[34]  A. C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  Optimizing land cover classification accuracy for change detection, a combined pixel-based and object-based approach in a mountainous area in Mexico , 2012 .

[35]  Ç. Şekercioğlu,et al.  Bird dietary guild richness across latitudes, environments and biogeographic regions , 2012 .

[36]  R. Fuller,et al.  Birds and habitat : relationships in changing landscapes , 2012 .

[37]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Segmentation optimization and stratified object-based analysis for semi-automated geomorphological mapping , 2011 .

[38]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Modeling forest songbird species richness using LiDAR-derived measures of forest structure , 2011 .

[39]  André Stumpf,et al.  Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests , 2011 .

[40]  Benjamin W. Heumann Satellite remote sensing of mangrove forests: Recent advances and future opportunities , 2011 .

[41]  Felix Liechti,et al.  Bird migration flight altitudes studied by a network of operational weather radars , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  S. Goetz,et al.  Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a Neotropical migrant bird. , 2010, Ecology.

[43]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[44]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[45]  Richard Field,et al.  Spatial patterns of woody plant and bird diversity: functional relationships or environmental effects? , 2008 .

[46]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[47]  Jeffrey J. Buler,et al.  A multi-scale examination of stopover habitat use by birds. , 2007, Ecology.

[48]  W. Kristan Sources and Expectations for Hierarchical Structure in Bird-habitat Associations , 2006 .

[49]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[50]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Weka-A Machine Learning Workbench for Data Mining , 2005, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[51]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection , 2004 .

[52]  N. Coops,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Remotely Sensed Data for Ecosystem Characterization , 2004 .

[53]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[54]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ON THREE POLLINATOR GUILDS , 2002 .

[55]  Josef Strobl,et al.  What’s wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS , 2001 .

[56]  Robert M. Zink,et al.  Bird species diversity , 1996, Nature.

[57]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .