The Social Dynamics of Economic Activity in a Virtual World

This paper examines social structures underlying economic activity in Second Life (SL), a massively multiplayer virtual world that allows users to create and trade virtual objects and commodities. We find that users conduct many of their transactions both within their social networks and within groups. Using frequency of chat as a proxy of tie strength, we observe that free items are more likely to be exchanged as the strength of the tie increases. Social ties particularly play a significant role in paid transactions for sellers with a moderately sized customer base. We further find that sellers enjoying repeat business are likely to be selling to niche markets, because their customers tend to be contained in a smaller number of groups. But while social structure and interaction can help explain a seller's revenues and repeat business, they provide little information in the forecasting a seller's future performance. Our quantitative analysis is complemented by a novel method of visualizing the transaction activity of a seller, including revenue, customer base growth, and repeat business.

[1]  Edward Castronova,et al.  As real as real? Macroeconomic behavior in a large-scale virtual world , 2009, New Media Soc..

[2]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content , 2009, EC '09.

[4]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The dynamics of viral marketing , 2005, EC '06.

[5]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  The Gift of the Gab?: A Design Oriented Sociology of Young People's Use of Mobiles , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[6]  Thomas M. Malaby Parlaying Value , 2006, Games Cult..

[7]  Edward Castronova,et al.  Virtual Worlds: A First-Hand Account of Market and Society on the Cyberian Frontier , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  M. Newman,et al.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  The Economic Leverage of the Virtual Community , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[10]  Katie Salen The ecology of games : connecting youth, games, and learning , 2008 .

[11]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Influence and correlation in social networks , 2008, KDD.

[12]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution , 2006, KDD '06.

[13]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[14]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Cory Ondrejka,et al.  Aviators, Moguls, Fashionistas and Barons: Economics and Ownership in Second Life , 2004 .