An Improved Method for Impervious Surface Mapping Incorporating LiDAR Data and High-Resolution Imagery at Different Acquisition Times

Impervious surface mapping incorporating high-resolution remote sensing imagery has continued to attract increasing interest, as it can provide detailed information about urban structure and distribution. Previous studies have suggested that the combination of LiDAR data and high-resolution imagery for impervious surface mapping yields better performance than the use of high-resolution imagery alone. However, due to LiDAR data’s high cost of acquisition, it is difficult to obtain LiDAR data that was acquired at the same time as the high-resolution imagery in order to conduct impervious surface mapping by multi-sensor remote sensing data. Consequently, the occurrence of real landscape changes between multi-sensor remote sensing data sets with different acquisition times results in misclassification errors in impervious surface mapping. This issue has generally been neglected in previous works. Furthermore, observation differences that were generated from multi-sensor data—including the problems of misregistration, missing data in LiDAR data, and shadow in high-resolution images—also present obstacles to achieving the final mapping result in the fusion of LiDAR data and high-resolution images. In order to resolve these issues, we propose an improved impervious surface-mapping method incorporating both LiDAR data and high-resolution imagery with different acquisition times that consider real landscape changes and observation differences. In the proposed method, multi-sensor change detection by supervised multivariate alteration detection (MAD) is employed to identify the changed areas and mis-registered areas. The no-data areas in the LiDAR data and the shadow areas in the high-resolution image are extracted via independent classification based on the corresponding single-sensor data. Finally, an object-based post-classification fusion is proposed that takes advantage of both independent classification results while using single-sensor data and the joint classification result using stacked multi-sensor data. The impervious surface map is subsequently obtained by combining the landscape classes in the accurate classification map. Experiments covering the study site in Buffalo, NY, USA demonstrate that our method can accurately detect landscape changes and unambiguously improve the performance of impervious surface mapping.

[1]  Bo Du,et al.  A Subspace-Based Change Detection Method for Hyperspectral Images , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[2]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[3]  Le Wang,et al.  Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing a Multi-directional Ground Filtering Algorithm for Airborne Lidar , 2022 .

[4]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing Extraction of Impervious Surface Areas from High Spatial Resolution Imagery by Multiple Agent Segmentation and Classification , 2022 .

[5]  Jixian Zhang,et al.  Advances in fusion of optical imagery and LiDAR point cloud applied to photogrammetry and remote sensing , 2017 .

[6]  Chong Liu,et al.  The Integrated Use of DMSP-OLS Nighttime Light and MODIS Data for Monitoring Large-Scale Impervious Surface Dynamics: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Changshan Wu,et al.  Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery , 2004 .

[8]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis , 2003 .

[9]  Peijun Li,et al.  A Multilevel Hierarchical Image Segmentation Method for Urban Impervious Surface Mapping Using Very High Resolution Imagery , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[10]  M. Bauer,et al.  Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery , 2007 .

[11]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers , 1999, Neural Processing Letters.

[12]  Chen Shi,et al.  Linear Spatial Spectral Mixture Model , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Austin Troy,et al.  Object-based land cover classification of shaded areas in high spatial resolution imagery of urban areas: A comparison study , 2009 .

[14]  Xin Huang,et al.  Information fusion of aerial images and LIDAR data in urban areas: vector-stacking, re-classification and post-processing approaches , 2011 .

[15]  Samia Boukir,et al.  Relevance of airborne lidar and multispectral image data for urban scene classification using Random Forests , 2011 .

[16]  Ruisheng Wang,et al.  3D building modeling using images and LiDAR: a review , 2013 .

[17]  Xuefei Hu,et al.  Impervious surface area extraction from IKONOS imagery using an object-based fuzzy method , 2011 .

[18]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[19]  Weiqi Zhou,et al.  An Object-Based Approach for Urban Land Cover Classification: Integrating LiDAR Height and Intensity Data , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[20]  Xuezhi Feng,et al.  Using Land Long-Term Data Records to Map Land Cover Changes in China Over 1981–2010 , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[21]  E. Terrence Slonecker,et al.  Remote sensing of impervious surfaces: A review , 2001 .

[22]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[23]  Li Zhang,et al.  An object-based two-stage method for a detailed classification of urban landscape components by integrating airborne LiDAR and color infrared image data: A case study of downtown Houston , 2009, 2009 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event.

[24]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Review ArticleDigital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review , 2004 .

[25]  Lindi J. Quackenbush,et al.  Impervious surface quantification using a synthesis of artificial immune networks and decision/regression trees from multi-sensor data , 2012 .

[26]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  MAPPING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA USING HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGERY: A COMPARISON OF OBJECT-BASED AND PER PIXEL CLASSIFICATION , 2006 .

[27]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[28]  J. A. Tullis,et al.  Synergistic Use of Lidar and Color Aerial Photography for Mapping Urban Parcel Imperviousness , 2003 .

[29]  Knut Conradsen,et al.  Multivariate Alteration Detection (MAD) and MAF Postprocessing in Multispectral, Bitemporal Image Data: New Approaches to Change Detection Studies , 1998 .

[30]  Qi Wang,et al.  Optimal Clustering Framework for Hyperspectral Band Selection , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Daniel L. Civco,et al.  TEMPORAL CHARACTERIZATION OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES FOR THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT , 2002 .

[32]  T. Schueler The importance of imperviousness , 1995 .

[33]  Allan Aasbjerg Nielsen,et al.  The Regularized Iteratively Reweighted MAD Method for Change Detection in Multi- and Hyperspectral Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[34]  D. Lu,et al.  Change detection techniques , 2004 .

[35]  C. Woodcock,et al.  An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal landsat TM data , 1996 .

[36]  Josiane Zerubia,et al.  Automatic Building Extraction from DEMs using an Object Approach and Application to the 3D-city Modeling , 2008 .

[37]  Bo Du,et al.  A post-classification change detection method based on iterative slow feature analysis and Bayesian soft fusion , 2017, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[38]  Kyle A. Hartfield,et al.  Fusion of High Resolution Aerial Multispectral and LiDAR Data: Land Cover in the Context of Urban Mosquito Habitat , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[39]  D. Civco,et al.  SUBPIXEL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAPPING , 2001 .

[40]  J. Harbor A Practical Method for Estimating the Impact of Land-Use Change on Surface Runoff, Groundwater Recharge and Wetland Hydrology , 1994 .

[41]  Bo Du,et al.  Kernel Slow Feature Analysis for Scene Change Detection , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[42]  C. Homer,et al.  Updating the 2001 National Land Cover Database Impervious Surface Products to 2006 using Landsat Imagery Change Detection Methods , 2010 .

[43]  Jixian Zhang Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends , 2010 .

[44]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Locality Adaptive Discriminant Analysis for Spectral–Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[45]  Qihao Weng,et al.  Modeling Urban Growth Effects on Surface Runoff with the Integration of Remote Sensing and GIS , 2001, Environmental management.

[46]  Wai Yeung Yan,et al.  Urban land cover classification using airborne LiDAR data: A review , 2015 .

[47]  Bisheng Yang,et al.  Hierarchical extraction of urban objects from mobile laser scanning data , 2015 .

[48]  Qihao Weng,et al.  Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends , 2012 .

[49]  Qihao Weng,et al.  Annual dynamics of impervious surface in the Pearl River Delta, China, from 1988 to 2013, using time series Landsat imagery , 2016 .

[50]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Classification of airborne laser scanning data using JointBoost , 2015 .

[51]  D. Lu,et al.  Use of impervious surface in urban land-use classification , 2006 .

[52]  C. Deng,et al.  A spatially adaptive spectral mixture analysis for mapping subpixel urban impervious surface distribution , 2013 .

[53]  A. Troy,et al.  An object‐oriented approach for analysing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level , 2008 .