Synchronization ability of coupled cell-cycle oscillators in changing environments

BackgroundThe biochemical oscillator that controls periodic events during the Xenopus embryonic cell cycle is centered on the activity of CDKs, and the cell cycle is driven by a protein circuit that is centered on the cyclin-dependent protein kinase CDK1 and the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). Many studies have been conducted to confirm that the interactions in the cell cycle can produce oscillations and predict behaviors such as synchronization, but much less is known about how the various elaborations and collective behavior of the basic oscillators can affect the robustness of the system. Therefore, in this study, we investigate and model a multi-cell system of the Xenopus embryonic cell cycle oscillators that are coupled through a common complex protein, and then analyze their synchronization ability under four different external stimuli, including a constant input signal, a square-wave periodic signal, a sinusoidal signal and a noise signal.ResultsThrough bifurcation analysis and numerical simulations, we obtain synchronization intervals of the sensitive parameters in the individual oscillator and the coupling parameters in the coupled oscillators. Then, we analyze the effects of these parameters on the synchronization period and amplitude, and find interesting phenomena, e.g., there are two synchronization intervals with activation coefficient in the Hill function of the activated CDK1 that activates the Plk1, and different synchronization intervals have distinct influences on the synchronization period and amplitude. To quantify the speediness and robustness of the synchronization, we use two quantities, the synchronization time and the robustness index, to evaluate the synchronization ability. More interestingly, we find that the coupled system has an optimal signal strength that maximizes the synchronization index under different external stimuli. Simulation results also show that the ability and robustness of the synchronization for the square-wave periodic signal of cyclin synthesis is strongest in comparison to the other three different signals.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the reaction process in which the activated cyclin-CDK1 activates the Plk1 has a very important influence on the synchronization ability of the coupled system, and the square-wave periodic signal of cyclin synthesis is more conducive to the synchronization and robustness of the coupled cell-cycle oscillators. Our study provides insight into the internal mechanisms of the cell cycle system and helps to generate hypotheses for further research.

[1]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Does the Potential for Chaos Constrain the Embryonic Cell-Cycle Oscillator? , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  A. Edwards,et al.  Sync-how order emerges from chaos in the universe, nature, and daily life , 2005 .

[3]  M. Stein Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling , 1987 .

[4]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Dynamics of two-component biochemical systems in interacting cells; synchronization and desynchronization of oscillations and multiple steady states. , 1997, Bio Systems.

[5]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[6]  Luonan Chen,et al.  Synchronization of genetic oscillators. , 2008, Chaos.

[7]  M. A. Henson,et al.  A molecular model for intercellular synchronization in the mammalian circadian clock. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Cellular Construction of a Circadian Clock: Period Determination in the Suprachiasmatic Nuclei , 1997, Cell.

[9]  Jongrae Kim,et al.  Stochastic Noise and Synchronisation during Dictyostelium Aggregation Make cAMP Oscillations Robust , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S3 Table S1 References Robust, Tunable Biological Oscillations from Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops , 2022 .

[11]  Sune Danø,et al.  Dynamical quorum sensing: Population density encoded in cellular dynamics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Bernard,et al.  Spontaneous synchronization of coupled circadian oscillators. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[13]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Modeling the Cell Cycle: Why Do Certain Circuits Oscillate? , 2011, Cell.

[14]  S. Yamaguchi,et al.  Synchronization of Cellular Clocks in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus , 2003, Science.

[15]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization in small-world networks. , 2008, Chaos.

[16]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  The Ups and Downs of Modeling the Cell Cycle , 2004, Current Biology.

[17]  Albert Goldbeter,et al.  Selection of in-phase or out-of-phase synchronization in a model based on global coupling of cells undergoing metabolic oscillations. , 2008, Chaos.

[18]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[19]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Detection of n:m Phase Locking from Noisy Data: Application to Magnetoencephalography , 1998 .

[20]  Nancy Kopell,et al.  Synchrony in a Population of Hysteresis-Based Genetic Oscillators , 2004, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[21]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Systems-Level Dissection of the Cell-Cycle Oscillator: Bypassing Positive Feedback Produces Damped Oscillations , 2005, Cell.

[22]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Entrainment of a Population of Synthetic Genetic Oscillators , 2011, Science.

[23]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems - a guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students , 2002, Software, environments, tools.

[24]  Joshua E. S. Socolar,et al.  Global control of cell-cycle transcription by coupled CDK and network oscillators , 2008, Nature.

[25]  J. R. Pomerening,et al.  Punctuated cyclin synthesis drives early embryonic cell cycle oscillations , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[26]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[27]  SteinMichael Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling , 1987 .