Quality of life during first-line FOLFOX4±panitumumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma: results from a randomised controlled trial

Introduction Metastatic colorectal cancer is rarely curable. Improving quality of life is therefore a key treatment goal. We report quality of life for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the PRIME study. Methods A randomised phase 3 open-label study of first-line panitumumab+FOLFOX4 vs FOLFOX4 enrolled adults with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. This analysis includes patients with wild-type RAS tumours (n=505). Quality of life (prespecified end point) was assessed using the EuroQoL 5-domain health state index and overall health rating in all patients and by early tumour shrinkage status (≥30% reduction in size by week 8; exploratory end point). Differences in quality of life were assessed using analysis of covariance and a mixed-effect piecewise linear model, and were also analysed by skin toxicity severity. Results There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms from baseline to progression or to discontinuation. Grade 3+ skin toxicity was reported by 38% of patients receiving panitumumab+FOLFOX4 and 2% receiving FOLFOX4 alone. There were no significant differences in quality of life between patients with grade 0–2 skin toxicity and those with grade 3+ skin toxicity. More patients receiving panitumumab+FOLFOX4 vs FOLFOX4 had early tumour shrinkage (p<.001). In patients with tumour symptoms at baseline, there were statistically significant improvements in quality of life in those with early tumour shrinkage versus those without early tumour shrinkage. Conclusions Addition of panitumumab to FOLFOX4 in first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs survival and has no negative effect on overall quality of life compared with FOLFOX4 alone. Specific quality of life assessments for skin toxicity should be included in study designs to better define the direct effect of these adverse events. Trial registration number NCT00364013.

[1]  J. Douillard,et al.  Q-TWiST analysis of panitumumab plus FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone in patients with previously untreated wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer , 2016, Current medical research and opinion.

[2]  M. Benasso,et al.  Acute skin toxicity management in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors: Literature review and consensus. , 2015, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[3]  M. Ando,et al.  2120 Quality of life analysis in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line FOLFIRI + cetuximab in the CRYSTAL study , 2015 .

[4]  M. Piccart,et al.  A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Impact of early tumour shrinkage and resection on outcomes in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[6]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI {+/-} panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  J. Douillard,et al.  RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  G. Grosso,et al.  Health related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: state of the art , 2013, BMC Surgery.

[10]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Kim,et al.  The impact of dermatological toxicities of anti‐cancer therapy on the dermatological quality of life of cancer patients , 2013, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[12]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Quality of life analysis in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated first-line with cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[13]  R. Greil,et al.  Skin toxicity and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI treatment in a single-arm phase II study , 2012, BMC Cancer.

[14]  A. Briggs,et al.  Analysis of adverse events and quality of life data for an economic evaluation of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: when can we stop collecting? , 2011, Trials.

[15]  J. Douillard,et al.  Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab in first- or second-line treatment , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  Josep Tabernero,et al.  Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  G. Keating Panitumumab , 2010, Drugs.

[18]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for treatment. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  G. Colucci,et al.  Psychological effects of cetuximab-induced cutaneous rash in advanced colorectal cancer patients , 2010, Supportive Care in Cancer.