Ontology Maturing: a Collaborative Web 2.0 Approach to Ontology Engineering

Most of the current methodologies for building ontologies rely on specialized knowledge engineers. This is in contrast to real-world settings, where the need for maintenance of domain specific ontologies emerges in the daily work of users. But in order to allow for participatory ontology engineering, we need to have a more realistic conceptual model of how ontologies develop in the real world. We introduce the ontology maturing processes which is based on the insight that ontology engineering is a collaborative informal learning process and for which we analyze characteristic evolution steps and triggers that have users engage in ontology engineering within their everyday work processes. This model integrates tagging and folksonomies with formal ontologies and shows maturing pathways between them. As implementations of this model, we present two case studies and the corresponding tools. The first is about image-based ontology engineering (introducing so-called imagenotions), the second about ontology-enabled social bookmarking (SOBOLEO). Both of them are inspired by lightweight Web 2.0 approaches and allow for realtime collaboration.

[1]  Sebastian Schaffert,et al.  IkeWiki: A Semantic Wiki for Collaborative Knowledge Management , 2006, 15th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE'06).

[2]  Martin Hepp,et al.  Possible Ontologies: How Reality Constrains the Development of Relevant Ontologies , 2007, IEEE Internet Computing.

[3]  Andreas P. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge Maturing and the Continuity of Context as a Unifying Concept for Knowledge Management and E-Learning , 2005 .

[4]  John Riedl,et al.  tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution , 2006, CSCW '06.

[5]  Algirdas Avizienis,et al.  Position Paper , 1994, EDCC.

[6]  Marieke Guy,et al.  Folksonomies: Tidying Up Tags? , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[7]  Susan Dunman,et al.  Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services , 1996 .

[8]  George A. Vouros,et al.  HCOME: A Tool-Supported Methodology for Engineering Living Ontologies , 2004, SWDB.

[9]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Kuhlthau, Carol Collier. Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. 2nd. ed. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004 , 2004, Inf. Res..

[10]  Boris Motik,et al.  Managing multiple and distributed ontologies on the Semantic Web , 2003, The VLDB Journal.

[11]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web , 2004, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[13]  Heidrun Allert,et al.  Rethinking the Use of Ontologies in Learning , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[14]  M. Naaman,et al.  Position Paper, Tagging, Taxonomy, Flickr, Article, ToRead , 2006 .

[15]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems , 2005, ArXiv.

[16]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  BibSonomy: a social bookmark and publication sharing system , 2006 .

[17]  Markus Krötzsch,et al.  Semantic Wikipedia , 2006, WikiSym '06.

[18]  York Sure-Vetter,et al.  A survey on methodologies for developing, maintaining, integrating, evaluating and reengineering ontologies , 2002 .

[19]  Martin Hepp,et al.  OntoWiki: community-driven ontology engineering and ontology usage based on Wikis , 2006, WikiSym '06.

[20]  David J. Israel,et al.  A Question-Answering System for AP Chemistry: Assessing KR&R Technologies , 2004, KR.

[21]  Ljiljana Stojanovic,et al.  Methods and tools for ontology evolution , 2004 .