Factors That Motivate Business Faculty to Conduct Research: An Expectancy Theory Analysis

In this study, the authors used expectancy theory to examine key factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research. The survey results, from 320 faculty members at 10 business schools, showed that faculty members who assign higher importance ratings to both the extrinsic and the intrinsic rewards of research exhibit higher research productivity. Study findings suggest that: (a) untenured faculty members are motivated by extrinsic rewards; (b) tenured faculty members are motivated by intrinsic rewards; (c) research productivity is positively correlated with tenure status and the percentage of work time allocated to research activities and negatively correlated with years in academic employment; (d) there is no relationship between research productivity and academic discipline; and (e) there is no relationship between research productivity and gender.

[1]  J. Lane,et al.  The Ombudsman: Factors Influencing Academic Research Productivity: A Survey of Management Scientists , 1992 .

[2]  D. Glennon,et al.  Work profiles of research statisticians. , 1990, Psychological reports.

[3]  Gerardine De Sanctis,et al.  Expectancy Theory as an Explanation of Voluntary Use of a Decision-Support System: , 1983 .

[4]  D. Hancock.  What Teachers May Do to Influence Student Motivation: An Application of Expectancy Theory. , 1995 .

[5]  Chee W. Chow,et al.  Factors contributing to success in research and publications: insights of influential accounting authors , 1998 .

[6]  J. A. Walsh,et al.  Pretenure and posttenure productivity trends of academic psychologists. , 1982 .

[7]  Alan S. Levitan,et al.  Personal and Institutional Characteristics Affecting Research Productivity of Academic Accountants , 1992 .

[8]  Flora F. Tien,et al.  To What Degree Does the Desire for Promotion Motivate Faculty to Perform Research? Testing the Expectancy Theory , 2000 .

[9]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[10]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[11]  Raymond D. Sauer,et al.  Life Cycle Productivity in Academic Research: Evidence from Cumulative Publication Histories of Academic Economists , 1995 .

[12]  Adams Js.  Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[13]  J. W. Holley.  Tenure and research productivity , 1977 .

[14]  Flora F. Tien,et al.  Faculty Rank System, Research Motivation, and Faculty Research Productivity: Measure Refinement and Theory Testing , 1996 .

[15]  P. R. Warshaw.  A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein , 1980 .

[16]  Qing Hu,et al.  IS Faculty Research Productivity: Influential Factors and Implications , 2000, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[17]  A. Diamond,et al.  The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.