The Effects of Task Interruption on Human Performance: A Study of the Systematic Classification of Human Behavior and Interruption Frequency

Interruptions are prevalent phenomena in modern working environments; yet, few interruption studies have been conducted on different types of human tasks. A study using computer-based human behavior tasks was carried out to investigate the effects of interruptions with 4 different primary-interrupting task sets. The tasks used in this study were determined by cognitive and motor skill processes based on human behavior classification theory. The results showed that interruption effects were most negative in cognitive/cognitive task sets, and skill/cognitive task sets showed the least amount of effects in task completion time, F3, 332 = 77.88, p < .001. In error rate performance, skill/skill task sets showed the highest rate, and error rates for cognitive primary task sets cognitive/cognitive and cognitive/skill task sets were not significantly different, F1, 42 = 41.18, p < .001; F1, 42 = 3.56, p = 0.0661. Interruption frequency also negatively affected task performance, F1, 412 = 89.88, p < .001, but skill tasks' quantitative performance did not show significant effects at different interruption frequencies, F1, 187 = 3.78, p = .0534. The results showed that interruptions increase more time to complete in cognitive tasks and produce more errors in skill tasks. Also, similar types of primary-interrupting tasks were more susceptible from interruptions. Thus, based on task composition of work process, we can estimate different effects from the interruptions and memory load, and task similarity in primary-interrupting task relationship were considered a main factor.

[1]  J. Shaoul Human Error , 1973, Nature.

[2]  Vincent G. Duffy,et al.  Toward development of a computer-based methodology for evaluating and reducing medication administration errors , 2005, Ergonomics.

[3]  Allen Newell,et al.  Cumulating the science of HCI: from s-R compatibility to transcription typing , 1989, CHI '89.

[4]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Further investigations into post-completion error : the effects of interruption position and duration , 2006 .

[5]  M. El-Gamal,et al.  Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral Strategies , 1995 .

[6]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Ivan Burmistrov,et al.  Interruptions in the computer aided office work: implications to user interface design , 1997 .

[8]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Chapter 12 Cognitive Number Processing: An Encoding-Complex Perspective , 1992 .

[9]  J. Reason Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Vincent G. Duffy,et al.  Evaluating Bar Coding‐Aided Medication Administration through Identification of Nursing Work Deficiencies , 2014 .

[11]  Michael Freed,et al.  Managing Multiple Tasks in Complex, Dynamic Environments , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[12]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Measuring the effects of interruptions on task performance in the user interface , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[13]  Craig M. Harvey,et al.  Cognitive, social, and environmental attributes of distributed engineering collaboration: A review and proposed model of collaboration , 2000 .

[14]  C. Wickens,et al.  Applied Attention Theory , 2007 .

[15]  J. G. Kreifeldt,et al.  Interruption as a test of the user-computer interface , 1981 .

[16]  Benjamin B. Weybrew The Zeigarnik Phenomenon Revisited: Implications for Enhancement of Morale , 1984 .

[17]  David Meister,et al.  Behavioral Analysis and Measurement Methods , 1985 .

[18]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[21]  Víctor M. González,et al.  "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres , 2004, CHI.

[22]  Louis Coraggio,et al.  Deleterious effects of intermittent interruptions on the task performance of knowledge workers: A laboratory investigation. , 1990 .

[23]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution , 2004, CHI.

[24]  D Reynolds,et al.  Time and event uncertainty in unisensory reaction time. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Geri Gay,et al.  The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments , 2003, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[26]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[27]  Graeme E. Field EXPERIMENTUS INTERRUPTUS , 1987, SGCH.

[28]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[29]  Paulo Victor Rodrigues de Carvalho,et al.  Nuclear power plant communications in normative and actual practice: A field study of control room operators' communications , 2007 .

[30]  Edmund Faison,et al.  Handbook on training and training equipment design , 1954 .

[31]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance , 2000 .

[32]  G. Salvendy,et al.  Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries , 2009 .

[33]  Helmut Krueger,et al.  Performance effects of reduced proprioceptive feedback on touch typists and casual users in a typing task , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[34]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[35]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Proposing a taxonomy and model of interruption , 2004, Proceedings. 6th International Workshop on Enterprise Networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry - Healthcom 2004 (IEEE Cat. No.04EX842).

[36]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  A diary study of task switching and interruptions , 2004, CHI.

[37]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  Mathematical Tasks as a Framework for Reflection: From Research to Practice , 1998 .

[38]  D. Broadbent,et al.  What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity , 1989 .

[39]  Deborah A Boehm-Davis,et al.  Reducing the disruptive effects of interruption: a cognitive framework for analysing the costs and benefits of intervention strategies. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[41]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[42]  Z. Keirn,et al.  A new mode of communication between man and his surroundings , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Evaluation of Nurse Interaction With Bar Code Medication Administration Technology in the Work Environment , 2007 .

[44]  H. Pashler,et al.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  H Eyrolle,et al.  The effects of interruptions in work activity: field and laboratory results. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[46]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Kara A. Latorella,et al.  The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..