Energy‐efficient encoding by shifting spikes in neocortical neurons

The speed of computations in neocortical networks critically depends on the ability of populations of spiking neurons to rapidly detect subtle changes in the input and translate them into firing rate changes. However, high sensitivity to perturbations may lead to explosion of noise and increased energy consumption. Can neuronal networks reconcile the requirements for high sensitivity, operation in a low‐noise regime, and constrained energy consumption? Using intracellular recordings in slices from the rat visual cortex, we show that layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons are highly sensitive to minor input perturbations. They can change their population firing rate in response to small artificial excitatory postsynaptic currents (aEPSCs) immersed in fluctuating noise very quickly, within 2–2.5 ms. These quick responses were mediated by the generation of new, additional action potentials (APs), but also by shifting spikes into the response peak. In that latter case, the spike count increase during the peak and the decrease after the peak cancelled each other, thus producing quick responses without increases in total spike count and associated energy costs. The contribution of spikes from one or the other source depended on the aEPSCs timing relative to the waves of depolarization produced by ongoing activity. Neurons responded by shifting spikes to aEPSCs arriving at the beginning of a depolarization wave, but generated additional spikes in response to aEPSCs arriving towards the end of a wave. We conclude that neuronal networks can combine high sensitivity to perturbations and operation in a low‐noise regime. Moreover, certain patterns of ongoing activity favor this combination and energy‐efficient computations.

[1]  Tomoki Fukai,et al.  Optimal spike-based communication in excitable networks with strong-sparse and weak-dense links , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Maxim Volgushev,et al.  Precise long-range synchronization of activity and silence in neocortical neurons during slow-wave oscillations [corrected]. , 2006, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Chaos in Neuronal Networks with Balanced Excitatory and Inhibitory Activity , 1996, Science.

[4]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  Evan S. Schaffer,et al.  Inhibitory Stabilization of the Cortical Network Underlies Visual Surround Suppression , 2009, Neuron.

[6]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Action potential threshold of hippocampal pyramidal cells in vivo is increased by recent spiking activity , 2001, Neuroscience.

[7]  Maxim Volgushev,et al.  Properties of Slow Oscillation during Slow-Wave Sleep and Anesthesia in Cats , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  P. Somogyi,et al.  Synchronization of neuronal activity in hippocampus by individual GABAergic interneurons , 1995, Nature.

[9]  D. Attwell,et al.  Updated Energy Budgets for Neural Computation in the Neocortex and Cerebellum , 2012, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[10]  Lin Tian,et al.  Activity in motor-sensory projections reveals distributed coding in somatosensation , 2012, Nature.

[11]  T. Freund,et al.  Differences between Somatic and Dendritic Inhibition in the Hippocampus , 1996, Neuron.

[12]  Michael Okun,et al.  Instantaneous correlation of excitation and inhibition during ongoing and sensory-evoked activities , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[14]  Michael S. Lewicki,et al.  Efficient coding of natural sounds , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Volgushev,et al.  Ultrafast Population Encoding by Cortical Neurons , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Maxim Volgushev,et al.  Precise Long-Range Synchronization of Activity and Silence in Neocortical Neurons during Slow-Wave Sleep , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Steriade,et al.  Neuronal Plasticity in Thalamocortical Networks during Sleep and Waking Oscillations , 2003, Neuron.

[18]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[19]  M. London,et al.  Sensitivity to perturbations in vivo implies high noise and suggests rate coding in cortex , 2010, Nature.

[20]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Fred Wolf,et al.  Fast Computations in Cortical Ensembles Require Rapid Initiation of Action Potentials , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[23]  C. Gray,et al.  Dynamic spike threshold reveals a mechanism for synaptic coincidence detection in cortical neurons in vivo. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Maxim Volgushev,et al.  γ‐Frequency fluctuations of the membrane potential and response selectivity in visual cortical neurons , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  Heinke,et al.  Spike Transmission and Synchrony Detection in Networks of GABAergic Interneurons , 2022 .

[26]  H Markram,et al.  Dynamics of population rate codes in ensembles of neocortical neurons. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  W Singer,et al.  All‐or‐none Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials in the Rat Visual Cortex , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  D. Attwell,et al.  Synaptic Energy Use and Supply , 2012, Neuron.

[29]  T R Vidyasagar,et al.  Membrane properties and spike generation in rat visual cortical cells during reversible cooling , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[31]  N. Matsuki,et al.  Interpyramid spike transmission stabilizes the sparseness of recurrent network activity. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  R. Miles,et al.  Single neurones can initiate synchronized population discharge in the hippocampus , 1983, Nature.

[33]  B. Sakmann,et al.  ‐Dynamic representation of whisker deflection by synaptic potentials in spiny stellate and pyramidal cells in the barrels and septa of layer 4 rat somatosensory cortex , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  A. Destexhe,et al.  The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Christopher D. Harvey,et al.  Choice-specific sequences in parietal cortex during a virtual-navigation decision task , 2012, Nature.

[36]  A. Pérez-Villalba Rhythms of the Brain, G. Buzsáki. Oxford University Press, Madison Avenue, New York (2006), Price: GB £42.00, p. 448, ISBN: 0-19-530106-4 , 2008 .

[37]  S. Laughlin,et al.  An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[38]  F. Theunissen From synchrony to sparseness , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  C. Petersen,et al.  The Excitatory Neuronal Network of the C2 Barrel Column in Mouse Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[40]  Sen Song,et al.  Highly Nonrandom Features of Synaptic Connectivity in Local Cortical Circuits , 2005, PLoS biology.

[41]  M. Brecht,et al.  Sparse and powerful cortical spikes , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[42]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  C. Gray,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms Contributing to Response Variability of Cortical Neurons In Vivo , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Odor Representations in the Mammalian Olfactory Bulb , 2002, Neuron.