Bot stamina: examining the influence and staying power of bots in online social networks

This study presents a novel approach to expand the emergent area of social bot research. We employ a methodological framework that aggregates and fuses data from multiple global Twitter conversations with an available bot detection platform and ultimately classifies the relative importance and persistence of social bots in online social networks (OSNs). In testing this methodology across three major global event OSN conversations in 2016, we confirmed the hyper-social nature of bots: suspected social bot accounts make far more attempts on average than social media accounts attributed to human users to initiate contact with other accounts via retweets. Social network analysis centrality measurements discover that social bots, while comprising less than 0.3% of the total corpus user population, display a disproportionately high level of structural network influence by ranking particularly high among the top users across multiple centrality measures within the OSN conversations of interest. Further, we show that social bots exhibit temporal persistence in centrality ranking density when examining these same OSN conversations over time.

[1]  Samuel C. Woolley,et al.  Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration , 2018 .

[2]  Hossein Hamooni,et al.  DeBot: Twitter Bot Detection via Warped Correlation , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).

[3]  Miriam Liss,et al.  Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction , 2017 .

[4]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[5]  Fabrizio Lillo,et al.  Cashtag Piggybacking , 2018, ACM Trans. Web.

[6]  Angelo Spognardi,et al.  From Reaction to Proaction: Unexplored Ways to the Detection of Evolving Spambots , 2018, WWW.

[7]  Maurizio Tesconi,et al.  Impromptu Crisis Mapping to Prioritize Emergency Response , 2016, Computer.

[8]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining , 2009 .

[9]  Alison Powell,et al.  Automation, Algorithms, and Politics| Bots and Political Influence: A Sociotechnical Investigation of Social Network Capital , 2016 .

[10]  Roberto Di Pietro,et al.  The Paradigm-Shift of Social Spambots: Evidence, Theories, and Tools for the Arms Race , 2017, WWW.

[11]  Markus Strohmaier,et al.  Ieee Intelligent Systems Computational Social Science for the World Wide Web Computational Social Science , 2022 .

[12]  Pablo Suárez-Serrato,et al.  On the Influence of Social Bots in Online Protests - Preliminary Findings of a Mexican Case Study , 2016, SocInfo.

[13]  Andrea Marchetti,et al.  Predictability or Early Warning: Using Social Media in Modern Emergency Response , 2016, IEEE Internet Comput..

[14]  Anthony Stefanidis,et al.  #Earthquake: Twitter as a Distributed Sensor System , 2013, Trans. GIS.

[15]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[16]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[17]  Huan Liu,et al.  A new approach to bot detection: Striking the balance between precision and recall , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[18]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[19]  Abdullah Mueen,et al.  Model Bots, not Humans on Social Media , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[20]  Fabián Riquelme,et al.  Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum , 2016, ArXiv.

[22]  Amos Azaria,et al.  The DARPA Twitter Bot Challenge , 2016, Computer.

[23]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Hossein Hamooni,et al.  Temporal Patterns in Bot Activities , 2017, WWW.

[25]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[26]  Tobias Hecking,et al.  Relational Patterns in Cross-Media Information Diffusion Networks , 2017, COMPLEX NETWORKS.

[27]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  Forecasting the onset and course of mental illness with Twitter data , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[28]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Dissecting a Social Botnet: Growth, Content and Influence in Twitter , 2015, CSCW.

[29]  D. Ruths,et al.  Social media for large studies of behavior , 2014, Science.

[30]  William E. Walden,et al.  A computer assisted study of Go on M x N boards , 1972, Information Sciences.

[31]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[32]  Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia,et al.  Fighting fake news: a role for computational social science in the fight against digital misinformation , 2017, Journal of Computational Social Science.

[33]  Dean Korosak,et al.  Collective behaviour of social bots is encoded in their temporal Twitter activity , 2017, Big Data.

[34]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media , 2017 .

[35]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[36]  D. Lazer,et al.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election , 2019, Science.

[37]  David A. Broniatowski,et al.  Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate , 2018, American journal of public health.

[38]  Angelo Spognardi,et al.  On the capability of evolved spambots to evade detection via genetic engineering , 2019, Online Soc. Networks Media.

[39]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[40]  Andrea Tagarelli,et al.  Learning to Rank Social Bots , 2018, HT.

[41]  Roberto Di Pietro,et al.  Social Fingerprinting: Detection of Spambot Groups Through DNA-Inspired Behavioral Modeling , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[42]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  People Are Strange When You're a Stranger: Impact and Influence of Bots on Social Networks , 2012, ICWSM.

[43]  Sushil Jajodia,et al.  Detecting Automation of Twitter Accounts: Are You a Human, Bot, or Cyborg? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[44]  Anthony Stefanidis,et al.  Bots in Nets: Empirical Comparative Analysis of Bot Evidence in Social Networks , 2018, COMPLEX NETWORKS.

[45]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls , 2014, ICWSM.

[46]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Tweet Analysis for Real-Time Event Detection and Earthquake Reporting System Development , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[47]  M. Prokopenko,et al.  Percolation Centrality: Quantifying Graph-Theoretic Impact of Nodes during Percolation in Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[48]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[49]  Konstantin Beznosov,et al.  Design and analysis of a social botnet , 2013, Comput. Networks.

[50]  Simon Hegelich,et al.  Are Social Bots on Twitter Political Actors? Empirical Evidence from a Ukrainian Social Botnet , 2016, ICWSM.

[51]  Fabrizio Lillo,et al.  $FAKE: Evidence of Spam and Bot Activity in Stock Microblogs on Twitter , 2018, ICWSM.

[52]  Angelo Spognardi,et al.  Better Safe Than Sorry: An Adversarial Approach to Improve Social Bot Detection , 2019, WebSci.

[53]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion , 2016, First Monday.

[54]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[55]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[56]  Maurizio Tesconi,et al.  RTbust: Exploiting Temporal Patterns for Botnet Detection on Twitter , 2019, WebSci.

[57]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[58]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[59]  Christian Fuchs,et al.  The Internet as a Self-Organizing Socio-Technological System , 2003, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[60]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization , 2017, ICWSM.

[61]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[62]  Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia,et al.  The spread of low-credibility content by social bots , 2017, Nature Communications.

[63]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Contagion dynamics of extremist propaganda in social networks , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[64]  Piotr Sapiezynski,et al.  Evidence of complex contagion of information in social media: An experiment using Twitter bots , 2017, PloS one.