Orderly recruitment among motoneurons supplying different muscles

Virtually all movements involve the recruitment of motor units from multiple muscles. Given the functional diversity of motor units (motoneurons and the muscle fibers they supply), the effective production of specific movements undoubtedly depends upon some principle(s) to organize the ensemble of active motor units. The principle acting to organize the recruitment of motor units within muscles is the size principle, whereby the first motor units to be recruited have the smallest values for axonal conduction velocity and contractile force, and are the slowest to contract and fatigue. Here we consider the possibility that the size principle applies in the recruitment of motor units across muscles, i.e., that regardless of their muscles of origin, active motor units are recruited in rank order, for example, from low to high conduction velocity. The benefits of orderly recruitment across muscles could be similar to the acknowledged advantages of orderly recruitment within muscles. One benefit is that the neural process involved in organizing active motor units would be simplified. In a muscle-based scheme, the size principle would organize only those motor units within individual muscles, leaving the nervous system with the additional task of coordinating the relative activities of motor units from different muscles. By contrast, in an ensemble-based scheme, orderly recruitment of all motor units according to the size principle would automatically coordinate motor units both within and across motor nuclei. Another potential benefit is the provision for movements with smooth trajectory, the result of interleaving the divergent torque contributions made by motor units from muscles that differ in their orientations about joints. Otherwise, if order were restricted within muscles, the torque trajectory of a joint would change unevenly as participating muscles begin contracting at different times and grade activity at different rates. These considerations support speculation that motor units recruited from co-contracting muscles are collectively recruited according to the size principle.

[1]  A. Taylor,et al.  Alpha and Gamma Motor Systems , 1995, Springer US.

[2]  M D Binder,et al.  Computer simulations of the effects of different synaptic input systems on motor unit recruitment. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Timothy C. Cope,et al.  The Size Principle: Still Working After All These Years , 1995 .

[4]  S. Gielen,et al.  Synergism in the control of force and movement of the forearm. , 1991, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[5]  Marc D. Binder,et al.  The Segmental motor system , 1990 .

[6]  R. Creed,et al.  Reflex Activity of the Spinal Cord , 1933 .

[7]  S. Riek,et al.  Recruitment of motor units in human forearm extensors. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  C. Romano,et al.  Selective recruitment of high‐threshold human motor units during voluntary isotonic lengthening of active muscles. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  G. Somjen,et al.  Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  E Henneman,et al.  Rank order of motoneurons within a pool: law of combination. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  F. Plum Handbook of Physiology. , 1960 .

[12]  Michael J. O'Donovan,et al.  Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. III. Functional segregation in sartorius. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Are there Important Exceptions to the Size Principle of α-Motoneurone Recruitment? , 1995 .

[14]  M. Taussig The Nervous System , 1991 .

[15]  E. Henneman,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE DESIGN OF SKELETAL MUSCLES. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Brian D. Clark,et al.  Size Principle of Motor Unit Recruitment: Extent of Its Applicability , 1996 .

[17]  T. Cope,et al.  Cutaneous stimulation fails to alter motor unit recruitment in the decerebrate cat. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  E Henneman,et al.  Recruitment order of motoneurons in stretch reflexes is highly correlated with their axonal conduction velocity. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Bobbert,et al.  Coordination in vertical jumping. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  T. Cope,et al.  Motor-unit recruitment in the decerebrate cat: several unit properties are equally good predictors of order. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  E Henneman,et al.  Responses of motoneurons of different sizes to graded stimulation of supraspinal centers of the brain. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  T. Nichols The organization of heterogenic reflexes among muscles crossing the ankle joint in the decerebrate cat. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.