Assessing development options in mining communities using stated preference techniques

In this paper, two key insights are generated about community development options using stated preference techniques. Surveys were conducted to identify how residents of a mining town in central Queensland, Australia, viewed options for the development of their township. First, residents were asked in a Choice Modelling experiment how worthwhile it would be to achieve some more attractive development options if it came at a cost to them. Second, residents were asked in a Choice Behaviour experiment how the different development options might influence their decision to stay or shift from the town in the future. The same development options were used in both experiments to facilitate comparisons between the two assessment forms.

[1]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Measuring Recreation Benefits of Quality Improvements with Revealed and Stated Behavior Data , 2000 .

[2]  J. Bennett,et al.  Estimating Society's Willingness to Pay to Maintain Viable Rural Communities , 2004 .

[3]  Raymond F. Mikesell,et al.  Explaining the resource curse, with special reference to mineral-exporting countries , 1997 .

[4]  A. Alberini,et al.  Combining the travel cost and contingent behavior methods to value cultural heritage sites: Evidence from Armenia , 2006 .

[5]  J. Herriges,et al.  Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand , 2010 .

[6]  J. Bennett,et al.  Towards the Development of a Transferable Set of Value Estimates for Environmental Attributes , 2004 .

[7]  L. Starke,et al.  Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development , 2003 .

[8]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation , 2000 .

[9]  John Rolfe,et al.  Assessing social and economic impacts associated with changes in the coal mining industry in the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia , 2007 .

[10]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[11]  John Rolfe,et al.  Coal mining and the resource community cycle: A longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine , 2009 .

[12]  R. Mugo,et al.  Case study of an integrated assessment: Shell's North Field Test in Alberta, Canada , 2010 .

[13]  John Rolfe,et al.  Lessons from the Social and Economic Impacts of the Mining Boom in the Bowen Basin 2004-2006 , 2007 .

[14]  James Goodman,et al.  The Minerals Boom and Australia's Resource Curse , 2008 .

[15]  John Rolfe,et al.  The value of recreational fishing in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: A pooled revealed preference and contingent behaviour model , 2010 .

[16]  John Rolfe,et al.  Valuing the Protection of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Sites , 2003 .

[17]  Mark E. Eiswerth,et al.  The value of water levels in water‐based recreation: A pooled revealed preference/contingent behavior model , 2000 .

[18]  John Rolfe,et al.  Mining Developments and Social Impacts on Communities: Bowen Basin Case Studies , 2009 .

[19]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Willingness to pay for quality improvements: should revealed and stated preference data be combined? , 1997 .

[20]  P. Howie,et al.  An Application of a Stated Preference Method to Value Urban Amenities , 2010 .

[21]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[22]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Valuing the Benefits of Coastal Water Quality Improvements Using Contingent and Real Behaviour , 2003 .

[23]  N. Krogman,et al.  Gender as contradiction: From dichotomies to diversity in natural resource extraction , 2011 .

[24]  Fiona Solomon,et al.  Social dimensions of mining: Research, policy and practice challenges for the minerals industry in Australia , 2008 .

[25]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Combining Actual and Contingent Behavior to Estimate the Value of Sports Fishing in the Lagoon of Venice , 2005 .