Quality assurance for clinical implementation of an electromagnetic tracking system.

The Calypso Medical 4D localization system utilizes alternating current electromagnetics for accurate, real-time tumor tracking. A quality assurance program to clinically implement this system is described here. Testing of the continuous electromagnetic tracking system (Calypso Medical Technologies, Seattle, WA) was performed using an in-house developed four-dimensional stage and a quality assurance fixture containing three radiofrequency transponders at independently measured locations. The following tests were performed to validate the Calypso system: (a) Localization and tracking accuracy, (b) system reproducibility, (c) measurement of the latency of the tracking system, and (d) measurement of transmission through the Calypso table overlay and the electromagnetic array. The translational and rotational localization accuracies were found to be within 0.01 cm and 1.0 degree, respectively. The reproducibility was within 0.1 cm. The average system latency was measured to be within 303 ms. The attenuation by the Calypso overlay was measured to be 1.0% for both 6 and 18 MV photons. The attenuations by the Calypso array were measured to be 2% and 1.5% for 6 and 18 MV photons, respectively. For oblique angles, the transmission was measured to be 3% for 6 MV, while it was 2% for 18 MV photons. A quality assurance process has been developed for the clinical implementation of an electromagnetic tracking system in radiation therapy.

[1]  John T. Wei,et al.  Target localization and real-time tracking using the Calypso 4D localization system in patients with localized prostate cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  M. Figl,et al.  Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Medical physics.

[3]  R. K. Münch,et al.  A novel tracking technique for the continuous precise measurement of tumour positions in conformal radiotherapy. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Evaluation of a miniature electromagnetic position tracker. , 2002, Medical physics.

[5]  A M Markoe,et al.  Computer controlled stereotaxic radiotherapy system. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Edward J. Vertatschitsch,et al.  Real Time Prostate Translation, Rotation, Deformation Evaluated with Calypso Beacon™ Transponders , 2005 .

[7]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment protocols for elektromagnetic tracking systems , 2003, CARS.

[8]  Kathleen Malinowski,et al.  Fiducial-based translational localization accuracy of electromagnetic tracking system and on-board kilovoltage imaging system. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  John Wong,et al.  Accuracy of a wireless localization system for radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: long-term outcomes. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Parag J. Parikh,et al.  4D Verification of Real-Time Accuracy of the Calypso System with Lung Cancer Patient Trajectory Data , 2005 .

[12]  Parag J. Parikh,et al.  Development of the 4D Phantom for patient-specific end-to-end radiation therapy QA , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  Sanford L. Meeks,et al.  Clinical Experience with the Calypso® 4D Localization System in Prostate Cancer Patients: Implantation, Tolerance, Migration, Localization and Real Time Tracking , 2005 .