Preparing for smart voice assistants: Cultural histories and media innovations

Smart voice assistants have become popular thanks largely to their default naturalistic female voices and helpful personae. In this article, we trace changes in robot voices in popular culture and explain how this history influenced the voice design of smart voice assistants. Our research draws on cultural analysis of Hollywood and international films, television and literature, and observations from our personal experiences with voice assistants. We argue that designers of devices like the Google Home and Amazon Echo inherited a cultural imaginary of alien and dangerous robots with artificial voices and personalities. Manufacturers leveraged techniques of modality, personae and invocation and pre-existing social connotations of the voice to create positive associations of these devices in the home. We conclude by arguing that smart voice assistants are new media innovations prepared for consumers through pre-domestication and represent an emerging regime of power and influence based on technologised voice interaction.

[1]  Karel Čapek,et al.  R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots) : a play in three acts and an epilogue , 1925 .

[2]  The Era of Ubiquitous Listening: Living in a World of Speech-Activated Devices , 2017 .

[3]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Aesthetic pleasures and gendered tech-work in the 21st-century smart home , 2018 .

[4]  Sean Jackson Eads.  Voice of the Machine , 2015 .

[5]  Jessica Fuerst.  Language And Identities , 2016 .

[6]  Toni Ferro,et al.  Fictional robots as a data source in HRI research: Exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[7]  S. Lanser,et al.  Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice , 1994 .

[8]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  The domestication of ICTs: households, families, and technical change , 1998 .

[9]  N Newman,et al.  Journalism, Media, and Technology Trends and Predictions 2017 , 2017 .

[10]  J. Nye,et al.  Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics , 2004 .

[11]  Jacob Smith.  Tearing Speech to Pieces: Voice technologies of the 1940s , 2008 .

[12]  C. Hermann,et al.  Capturing Sound , 2020, Directing the Documentary.

[13]  Thomas R. Whitaker,et al.  Conversation as Design. , 1984 .

[14]  Daisong Guan,et al.  Chat with Smart Conversational Agents: How to Evaluate Chat Experience in Smart Home , 2019, MobileHCI.

[15]  Thao Phan.  Amazon Echo and the Aesthetics of Whiteness , 2019, Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience.

[16]  James R. Lewis.  The Voice in the Machine: Building Computers That Understand Speech , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Barbara Creed.  The monstrous-feminine : film, feminism, psychoanalysis , 2015 .

[18]  D. Ihde.  Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound , 2007 .

[19]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[20]  Robert Szabo,et al.  Information and Communication Technologies , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[21]  Mark Sadoski.  Imagination, Cognition, and Persona , 1992 .

[22]  Mark West,et al.  I'd blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education , 2019 .

[23]  Johanna Uotinen.  Digital Television and the Machine That Goes “PING!”: Autoethnography as a Method for Cultural Studies of Technology , 2010 .

[24]  Lene Nielsen,et al.  Personas - User Focused Design , 2012, Human–Computer Interaction Series.

[25]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[26]  Juliane Freud,et al.  Capturing Sound How Technology Has Changed Music , 2016 .

[27]  Ritwik Dasgupta.  Voice User Interface Design , 2018, Apress.

[28]  Heiga Zen,et al.  WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio , 2016, SSW.

[29]  T. V. Leeuwen.  Speech, Music, Sound , 1999 .

[30]  Robert Linggard.  Electronic synthesis of speech , 1985 .

[31]  William D. Taylor,et al.  Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word , 1984 .

[32]  R. M. Schafer,et al.  The new soundscape : a handbook for the modern music teacher , 1969 .

[33]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: technical change and everyday life , 1996 .

[34]  Hilary Bergen,et al.  ‘I’d Blush if I Could’: Digital Assistants, Disembodied Cyborgs and the Problem of Gender , 2016 .

[35]  F. Guattari,et al.  Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm , 1995 .

[36]  Shanyang Zhao,et al.  Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication , 2006, New Media Soc..

[37]  Peter Krapp.  Noise Channels: Glitch and Error in Digital Culture , 2011 .

[38]  Minna Saariketo,et al.  The Unchallenged Persuasions of Mobile Media Technology: The Pre-Domestication of Google Glass in the Finnish Press , 2018, DHN.

[39]  H. Woods.  Asking more of Siri and Alexa: feminine persona in service of surveillance capitalism , 2018, Critical Studies in Media Communication.

[40]  5: Do You Know Karina? , 2013 .

[41]  K. Crawford,et al.  Anatomy of an AI System , 2019 .

[42]  M. Goulden.  ‘Delete the family’: platform families and the colonisation of the smart home , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.

[43]  Thao Phan.  The Materiality of the Digital and the Gendered Voice of Siri , 2017 .