Systematic Failure of the Woods-Saxon Nuclear Potential to Describe Both Fusion and Elastic Scattering: Possible Need for a New Dynamical Approach to Fusion

A large number of precision fusion excitation functions, at energies above the average fusion barriers, have been fitted using the Woods-Saxon form for the nuclear potential in a barrier passing model of fusion. They give values for the empirical diffuseness parameter a ranging between 0.75 and 1.5 fm, compared with values of about 0.65 fm which generally reproduce elastic scattering data. There is a clear tendency for the deduced a to increase strongly with the reaction charge product Z1Z2, and some evidence for the effect of nuclear structure on the value of a, particularly with regard to the degree of neutron richness of the fusing nuclei, and possibly with regard to deformation. The measured fusion-barrier energies are always lower than those of the bare potentials used, which is expected as a result of adiabatic coupling to high energy collective states. This difference increases with increasing Z1Z2 and calculations show that about 1 / 3 of it may be attributed to coupling to the isoscalar giant-quadrupole resonances in the target and projectile. Coupling to all giant resonances may account for a significant part. Fluctuations about the trend line may be due to systematic errors in the data and/or structure effects such as coupling to collective octupole states. Previously suggested reasons for the large values of a have been related to departures from the Woods-Saxon potential and to dissipative effects. This work suggests that the apparently large values of a may be an artifact of trying to describe the dynamical fusion process by use of a static potential. Another partial explaination might reside in fusion inhibition, due for example to deep-inelastic scattering, again a process requiring dynamical calculations.

[1]  K. Hagino,et al.  Systematics of precise nuclear fusion cross sections: the need for a new dynamical treatment of fusion? , 2004 .

[2]  M. Dasgupta,et al.  Double Folding Nucleus-Nucleus Potential Applied to Heavy-Ion Fusion Reactions , 2004 .

[3]  B. Back,et al.  Analysis of heavy ion fusion reactions at extreme subbarrier energies , 2004 .

[4]  V. Zagrebaev Sub-barrier fusion enhancement due to neutron transfer , 2003 .

[5]  K. Hagino,et al.  Fusion Cross Sections at Deep Sub-barrier Energies , 2003, nucl-th/0302025.

[6]  Ning Wang,et al.  Dynamic study on fusion reactions for $^{40,48}$Ca+$^{90,96}$Zr around Coulomb barrier , 2003, nucl-th/0301027.

[7]  K. Hagino,et al.  Fusion suppression and sub-barrier breakup of weakly bound nuclei. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[8]  M. Dasgupta,et al.  Measurement of the effect of large deformation-aligned ground-state spin on fission fragment anisotropies , 2002 .

[9]  K. Hagino,et al.  Dominance of Collective over Proton Transfer Couplings in the Fusion of 32 S and 34 S with 89 Y , 2002 .

[10]  B. Back,et al.  Unexpected behavior of heavy-ion fusion cross sections at extreme sub-barrier energies. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[11]  V. Denisov,et al.  Interaction potential between heavy ions , 2002 .

[12]  Ning Wang,et al.  Improved quantum molecular dynamics model and its applications to fusion reaction near barrier , 2002, nucl-th/0201079.

[13]  K. Hagino,et al.  Isotopic dependence and channel coupling effects in the fusion of 16O+ 112,116Sn and 32S+ 112,116,120Sn at energies around the barrier , 2001 .

[14]  A. Gadea,et al.  Sub-barrier fusion of the magic nuclei 40,48Ca+48Ca , 2001 .

[15]  K. Hagino,et al.  Experimental barrier distributions for the fusion of 12 C, 16 O, 28 Si and 35 Cl with 92 Zr and coupled-channels analyses , 2001 .

[16]  M. Dasgupta,et al.  Unexpected inhibition of fusion in nucleus–nucleus collisions , 2001, Nature.

[17]  A. Godley,et al.  Memory of the entrance-channel K-distribution observed in fission at high angular momentum , 2000 .

[18]  A. Stefanini,et al.  Fusion of 40Ca+124Sn around the Coulomb barrier , 2000 .

[19]  M. Bisogno,et al.  Near-barrier fusion of 36 S+ 90,96 Zr: The effect of the strong octupole vibration of 96 Zr , 2000 .

[20]  V. N. Kondratyev,et al.  Kinetics in sub-barrier fusion of spherical nuclei , 2000 .

[21]  M. Dasgupta,et al.  Limiting angular momentum for statistical model description of fission , 1999 .

[22]  K. Hagino,et al.  A program for coupled-channel calculations with all order couplings for heavy-ion fusion reactions , 1999, nucl-th/9903074.

[23]  A. S. Toledo,et al.  Fusion versus breakup: observation of large fusion suppression for 9Be + 208Pb , 1999, nucl-ex/9901003.

[24]  A. Stefanini,et al.  MEASURING BARRIERS TO FUSION , 1998 .

[25]  K. Hagino,et al.  Effects of finite width of excited states on heavy-ion sub-barrier fusion reactions , 1998, nucl-th/9805043.

[26]  F. Scarlassara,et al.  A case study of collectivity, transfer and fusion enhancement , 1998 .

[27]  R. Vandenbosch,et al.  Transfer and surface vibration couplings in the fusion of {sup 40}Ca+{sup 46,48,50}Ti at near-barrier energies , 1998 .

[28]  N. Rowley,et al.  Fusion excitation function measurements for the 16O+58Ni and 16O+62Ni systems , 1998 .

[29]  P. Fröbrich,et al.  Langevin description of fusion, deep-inelastic collisions and heavy-ion-induced fission , 1998 .

[30]  K. Hagino,et al.  ADIABATIC QUANTUM TUNNELING IN HEAVY-ION SUB-BARRIER FUSION , 1997, nucl-th/9702024.

[31]  Liang,et al.  Fusion barrier distributions for heavy ion systems involving prolate and oblate target nuclei. , 1996, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[32]  A. Stefanini,et al.  Cross sections and average angular momenta in the fusion of 28Si+94,100Mo and 58,64Ni+64Ni☆ , 1996 .

[33]  Johnson,et al.  Are octupole vibrations harmonic? , 1995, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[34]  M. Dasgupta,et al.  Competition between fusion-fission and quasi-fission in the reaction 28Si+208Pb , 1995 .

[35]  Napoli,et al.  Influence of complex surface vibrations on the fusion of 58Ni+60Ni. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[36]  W. Reisdorf Heavy-ion reactions close to the Coulomb barrier , 1994 .

[37]  Abe,et al.  Role of mass renormalization in adiabatic quantum tunneling. , 1994, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[38]  Rossi,et al.  Pair transfer and the sub-barrier fusion of 18O+58Ni. , 1992, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[39]  P. Fröbrich,et al.  Langevin description of heavy-ion collisions within the surface friction model , 1992 .

[40]  M. Dasgupta,et al.  Fusion of 28Si + 68Zn, 32S + 64Ni, 37Cl + 59Co and 45Sc + 51V in the vicinity of the Coulomb barrier , 1992 .

[41]  Wei,et al.  Experimental determination of the fusion-barrier distribution for the 154Sm+16O reaction. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[42]  J. Lestone,et al.  A compact velocity filter for evaporation residue measurements , 1991 .

[43]  P. Fröbrich,et al.  A Langevin description of the competition between fusion and deep-inelastic collisions close to the barrier , 1991 .

[44]  N. Rowley,et al.  On the “distribution of barriers” interpretation of heavy-ion fusion , 1991 .

[45]  N. Rowley,et al.  Scaling of heavy-ion fusion cross sections and other entrance-channel properties , 1989 .

[46]  C. Dasso,et al.  CCDEF - A simplified coupled-channel code for fusion cross sections including static nuclear deformations , 1989 .

[47]  Baldo,et al.  Transition from quasielastic to damped processes in the 32S+64Ni reaction. , 1989, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[48]  R. Spear Reduced electric-octupole transition probabilities, B(E3;01+ → 31−), for even-even nuclides throughout the periodic table , 1989 .

[49]  Dasso,et al.  Presence of a deep inelastic component at bombarding energies close to the Coulomb barrier: The Ni+Sn case. , 1989, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[50]  Ian J. Thompson,et al.  Coupled reaction channels calculations in nuclear physics , 1988 .

[51]  Bhatt,et al.  Systematics of B(E2;01+-->21+) values for even-even nuclei. , 1988, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[52]  Wolfs Fission and deep-inelastic scattering yields for 58Ni , 1987, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[53]  C. Dasso,et al.  CCFUS — A simplified coupled-channel code for calculation of fusion cross sections in heavy-ion reactions , 1987 .

[54]  K. Harada,et al.  Enhancement of the subbarrier fusion reaction due to neck formation , 1987 .

[55]  C. Vries,et al.  Nuclear charge-density-distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering , 1987 .

[56]  F. Wolfs Fission and deep-inelastic scattering yields for Ni-58 + 112, Sn-124 at energies around the barrier , 1987 .

[57]  F. Hessberger,et al.  Cold fusion in symmetric 90Zr-induced reactions , 1986 .

[58]  Tsang,et al.  Angular distributions in heavy-ion-induced fission. , 1985, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[59]  W. J. Swiatecki,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF NUCLEAR COALESCENCE OR RESEPARATION , 1981 .

[60]  C. Wong Interaction Barrier in Charged-Particle Nuclear Reactions , 1973 .

[61]  O. Kübler Projection method, cranking condition and collective energy , 1972 .

[62]  E. GWYNNE JONES,et al.  Nuclear Structure , 1932, Nature.