Quantitative analysis of CuIn1−xGaxSe2 thin films with fluctuation of operational parameters using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

To enable a quantitative analysis of CuIn1−xGaxSe2 (CIGS) thin solar cell films using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), a new method based on the internal standard principle is proposed to identify the spectral line pairs unaffected by the fluctuations of measurement conditions. Due to nonlinear calibration curves resulting from the high concentration of constituent elements of CIGS, the standard deviation of measured line intensity ratios divided by the slope of calibration curves was introduced as a new figure of merit to determine the precision of LIBS analysis along with the linearity of data points in the correlation plots. From the analyses of 39 Cu, 10 In, and 5 Ga emission lines, Cu 324.754 nm–In 325.608 nm, Cu 219.975 nm–Ga 287.424 nm, and In 303.935 nm–Ga 287.424 nm line pairs were identified as the spectral lines of which intensity ratios were least influenced by the fluctuations of spot size, the position of collection optics, and/or laser energy. The selected line pairs, except the Cu 219.975 nm line, had similar upper level energy and consisted of strong resonance lines. It was found that the use of these strong lines has advantages of better reproducibility and precision for the analysis of elements with high concentration for which the calibration curve may become nonlinear due to self-absorption.

[1]  Helmut H. Telle,et al.  Quantitative analysis using remote laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) , 1995 .

[2]  J. A. Aguilera,et al.  Plasma shielding effect in laser ablation of metallic samples and its influence on LIBS analysis , 1998 .

[3]  Bulatov,et al.  Converting spatial to pseudotemporal resolution in laser plasma analysis by simultaneous multifiber spectroscopy , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  S. Pershin,et al.  Laser beam profile influence on LIBS analytical capabilities: single vs. multimode beam , 2010, 1308.3051.

[5]  J. D. Winefordner,et al.  Variables Influencing the Precision of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Measurements , 1998 .

[6]  S. K. Deb,et al.  Electronic properties versus composition of thin films of CuInSe2 , 1984 .

[7]  G. Teeter,et al.  Properties of high-efficiency CuInGaSe2 thin film solar cells , 2005 .

[8]  J. A. Aguilera,et al.  Improvements in Quantitative Analysis of Steel Composition by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy at Atmospheric Pressure Using an Infrared Nd:YAG Laser , 1999 .

[9]  Paolo Cielo,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Aluminum Alloys by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Plasma Characterization , 1995 .

[10]  Jidong Lu,et al.  Effects of experimental parameters on elemental analysis of coal by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2009 .

[11]  David A. Cremers,et al.  Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy—Capabilities and Limitations , 2009 .

[12]  J. Mermet,et al.  Analysis of glass by UV laser ablation inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Part 2. Analytical figures of merit , 1996 .

[13]  Timur A. Labutin,et al.  A review of normalization techniques in analytical atomic spectrometry with laser sampling: From single to multivariate correction , 2010 .

[14]  G. Cristoforetti,et al.  Evaluation of self-absorption coefficients of aluminum emission lines in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements , 2005 .

[15]  R. Russo,et al.  Analysis of the absorption layer of CIGS solar cell by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. , 2012, Applied optics.

[16]  Jean-Michel Mermet,et al.  Processing of shot-to-shot raw data to improve precision in laser-induced breakdown spectrometry microprobe , 2008 .

[17]  D. Cremers,et al.  Effect of Sampling Geometry on Elemental Emissions in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy , 1996 .

[18]  Stefano Legnaioli,et al.  Evaluation of self-absorption of manganese emission lines in Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy measurements , 2006 .