Design and test of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) electrostatic spraying system for crop protection

In recent years, multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) crop protection operations have experienced tremendous growth. Compared with manual operations, they have advantages such as high operational efficiency, small pesticide dosage, and low pesticide hazards for humans. However, the tiny droplets produced during UAV spraying for crop protection are affected by the rotor air flow and will drift in all directions in an uncontrollable manner, severely affecting the pesticide deposition pattern and resulting in pesticide waste. To improve pesticide use efficiency during multi-rotor UAV spraying, an electrostatic spray system was designed based on electrostatic spray technology and a six-rotor UAV. The proper operation parameters for the UAV electrostatic spray were determined by test, which were spray altitude of 50 cm above the crop, spray pressure of 0.3 MPa and charging voltage of 9 kV. Field test was performed based on these parameters. The results showed that compared with non-electrostatic spray, the electrostatic spray improved by 13.6% in the average deposition density above the sampling device and 32.6% in the middle. The research can provide a reference for designing multi-rotor UAV electrostatic spray devices. Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), multi-rotor, electrostatic spraying, pesticide use efficiency, plant protection DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20171006.3460 Citation: Zhang Y L, Lian Q, Zhang W. Design and test of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) electrostatic spraying system for crop protection. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(6): 68–76.

[1]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Spray Drift From Ground and Aerial Applications , 1992 .

[2]  Spray drift reduction techniques for vineyards in fragmented landscapes. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Noboru Noguchi,et al.  Simulation and test of an agricultural unmanned airboat maneuverability model , 2017 .

[4]  A. J. Hewitt,et al.  Drift Management Using Modeling and GIS Systems , 2002 .

[5]  Zhang Yang,et al.  Design and test of operation parameters for rice air broadcasting by unmanned aerial vehicle , 2016 .

[6]  David Nuyttens,et al.  The influence of operator-controlled variables on spray drift from field crop sprayers , 2007 .

[7]  Wang Haiyang,et al.  Wind tunnel experimental study on droplet drift reduction by a conical electrostatic nozzle for pesticide spraying , 2017 .

[8]  I. W. Kirk,et al.  AERIAL ELECTROSTATIC SPRAY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[9]  Denis Stajnko,et al.  Development of alternative plant protection product application techniques in orchards, based on measurement sensing systems: A review , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[10]  He Xiongkui,et al.  Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle for plant protection in East Asia , 2017 .

[11]  Hu Yongguang,et al.  Optimal flight parameters of unmanned helicopter for tea plantation frost protection , 2015 .

[12]  Chen Chao,et al.  Influences of nozzle parameters and low-pressure on jet breakup and droplet characteristics , 2016 .

[13]  Milton E. Teske,et al.  Aerial Application Model Extension into the Far Field , 2004 .

[14]  Song Jianli,et al.  Precision orchard sprayer based on automatically infrared target detecting and electrostatic spraying techniques , 2011 .

[15]  P. G. Andersen,et al.  Determination of drift potential of different flat fan nozzles on a boom sprayer using a test bench , 2014 .

[16]  Young Mo Koo,et al.  Flight Attitudes and Spray Patterns of a Roll-Balanced Agricultural Unmanned Helicopter , 2013 .

[17]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Current status and future trends of precision agricultural aviation technologies , 2017 .