Public versus expert opinions regarding public involvement processes used in resource and wildlife management

Successful public involvement efforts can reduce conflict and build trust between resource managers and the public. Differences of opinion between the public and wildlife managers regarding the importance of various characteristics and methods of public involvement have implications for managers wishing to design effective public involvement processes. We compared and contrasted the preferences of German public and European experts in large mammal management regarding characteristics and methods of public involvement. Expert participants attributed high levels of importance to including scientific information in decision making while general public respondents attributed high levels of importance to the cost effectiveness and representativeness of the public involvement effort. Differences were also observed regarding public involvement methods. Experts preferred task forces and advisory groups while the general public preferred information materials and public meetings. We discuss the likely causes of similarities and differences between these two groups and examine the consequent implications for managers.

[1]  L. Balčiauskas.  EUROPEAN BISON (BISON BONASUS) IN LITHUANIA: STATUS AND POSSIBILITIES OF RANGE EXTENSION , 1999 .

[2]  B. Mitchell.  Geography and resource analysis , 1981 .

[3]  Daniel J. Fiorino.  Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[4]  W. Schroder.  Challenges to wildlife management and conservation in Europe , 1998 .

[5]  W. Olech,et al.  European Bison: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan , 2003 .

[6]  B. Knuth,et al.  The role of agency goals and local context in Great Lakes water resources public involvement programs , 1993 .

[7]  S. Stoll-Kleemann.  Reconciling Opposition to Protected Areas Management in Europe: The German Experience , 2001 .

[8]  Jody W. Enck,et al.  Wildlife-Human Interactions in National Parks in Canada and the USA , 2003 .

[9]  Seth Tuler,et al.  Voices from the Forest: What Participants Expect of a Public Participation Process , 1999 .

[10]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[11]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[12]  H. K. Cordell,et al.  Recreation and the Environment as Cultural Dimensions in Contemporary American Society , 2002 .

[13]  Susan Wismer,et al.  Citizen involvement in sustainability-centred environmental assessment follow-up , 2005 .

[14]  J. Eyles,et al.  Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[15]  G. White,et al.  How many mule deer are there? Challenges of credibility in Colorado , 2004 .

[16]  K. Miller,et al.  Toward Incorporating Human Dimensions Information into Wildlife Management Decision-Making , 2001 .

[17]  S. Mccool,et al.  Mapping the Dimensions of Successful Public Participation in Messy Natural Resources Management Situations , 2001 .

[18]  Measuring Fairness in Citizen Participation: A Case Study of Moose Management , 1999 .

[19]  Jane M. Packard,et al.  Acceptance of scientific management by natural resource dependent communities , 1997 .

[20]  Dale J. Blahna,et al.  Public involvement in resource planning: Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation , 1989 .

[21]  E. Small,et al.  Global biodiversity - The source of new crops , 2008 .

[22]  R. Frankham,et al.  Pragmatic population viability targets in a rapidly changing world , 2010 .

[23]  S. Riley,et al.  Adaptive Impact Management: An Integrative Approach to Wildlife Management , 2003 .

[24]  Wildlife Managers and Public Involvement: Letting the Crazy Aunt Out , 2001 .

[25]  D. Decker,et al.  Designing stakeholder involvement strategies to resolve wildlife management controversies , 2002 .

[26]  R. Lejano,et al.  The Importance of Context: Integrating Resource Conservation with Local Institutions , 2007 .

[27]  Devra G. Kleiman,et al.  Reintroduction of Captive Mammals for Conservation Guidelines for reintroducing endangered species into the wild , 1989 .

[28]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Choosing Public Participation Methods for Natural Resources: A Context-Specific Guide , 2001 .

[29]  A. Bath,et al.  The Return of the King or Bringing Snails to the Garden? The Human Dimensions of a Proposed Restoration of European Bison (Bison bonasus) in Germany , 2010 .

[30]  Rebecca Brown,et al.  Comanagement of wildlife corridors: the case for citizen participation in the Algonquin to Adirondack proposal. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  Daniel J. Decker,et al.  Public Participation in Wildlife Management: What Do Stakeholders Want? , 2004 .

[32]  M. Nie.  State Wildlife Policy and Management: The Scope and Bias of Political Conflict , 2004 .

[33]  R. Wallace,et al.  Co-Managing Human–Wildlife Conflicts: A Review , 2006 .

[34]  Frank N. Laird,et al.  Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making , 1993 .