The volatility surprise of leading cryptocurrencies: Transitory and permanent linkages

Abstract There is scarce literature examining the volatility linkages among leading cryptocurrencies, and none exists on the linkages among unexpected volatility, called ‘volatility surprise’. To address this literature gap, we build on the concept of volatility surprise and examine the causal linkages among the volatility of leading cryptocurrencies via the frequency-domain test of Bodart and Candelon (2009), discriminating between transitory and permanent causalities. Permanent shocks are more important in explaining the Granger-causality that does not necessarily emanate from the largest, Bitcoin, over short horizons, whereas transitory shocks dominate the causality across smaller cryptocurrencies over long horizons.

[1]  Jörg Breitung,et al.  Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach , 2006 .

[2]  D. Roubaud,et al.  Co-explosivity in the cryptocurrency market , 2019, Finance Research Letters.

[3]  A. Subbotin,et al.  Price dynamics in a market with heterogeneous investment horizons and boundedly rational traders , 2013 .

[4]  T. Walther,et al.  Bitcoin is not the New Gold – A comparison of volatility, correlation, and portfolio performance , 2018, International Review of Financial Analysis.

[5]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[6]  Luiz Koodi Hotta,et al.  Outliers in GARCH Processes , 2012 .

[7]  Qiang Ji,et al.  Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets , 2019, International Review of Financial Analysis.

[8]  Dimitrios Koutmos Return and volatility spillovers among cryptocurrencies , 2018, Economics Letters.

[9]  Konstantinos Gkillas,et al.  An application of extreme value theory to cryptocurrencies , 2018 .

[10]  Elie Bouri,et al.  Trading volume and the predictability of return and volatility in the cryptocurrency market , 2019, Finance Research Letters.

[11]  C. Sutcliffe,et al.  Optimal vs. Naïve Diversification in Cryptocurrencies , 2018, Economics Letters.

[12]  Lars Ivar Hagfors,et al.  On the Hedge and Safe Haven Properties of Bitcoin: Is it Really More than a Diversifier? , 2016 .

[13]  Ronald W. Masulis,et al.  Correlations in Price Changes and Volatility Across International Stock Markets , 1990 .

[14]  Cryptocurrencies as a Financial Asset: A Systematic Analysis , 2019 .

[15]  D. Baur,et al.  Bitcoin: Medium of Exchange or Speculative Assets? , 2015 .

[16]  B. Candelon,et al.  Evidences of interdependence and contagion using a frequency domain framework , 2005 .

[17]  Julien Chevallier,et al.  Volatility equicorrelation: A cross-market perspective , 2014 .

[18]  R. Engle Statistical Models for Financial Volatility , 1993 .

[19]  S. Corbet,et al.  Exploring the Dynamic Relationships between Cryptocurrencies and Other Financial Assets , 2017 .

[20]  Roland Mestel,et al.  Price discovery of cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and beyond , 2018 .

[21]  S. Nadarajah,et al.  GARCH Modelling of Cryptocurrencies , 2017 .

[22]  Emmanouil Platanakis,et al.  Portfolio Management with Cryptocurrencies: The Role of Estimation Risk , 2019, Economics Letters.

[23]  Gonçalo Faria,et al.  Forecasting Stock Market Returns by Summing the Frequency-Decomposed Parts , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.