Revealing system variability in offshore service operations through systemic hazard analysis

Abstract. As wind farms are moving farther offshore, logistical concepts increasingly include service operation vessels (SOVs) as the prime means of service delivery. However, given the complexity of SOV operations in hostile environments, their safety management is challenging. The objective of this paper is to propose a quantitative, non-probabilistic metric for the preliminary comparison of SOV operational phases. The metric is used as a conditional proxy for the incident likelihood, conditioned upon the presence of similar resources (manpower, time, skills, knowledge, information, etc.) for risk management across compared operational phases. The comparison shows that the three considered phases of SOV operation have rather comparable levels of variability, hence the likelihood for incidents. However, the interface between the SOV and turbine via the gangway system and the manoeuvring between turbines seem to show a higher potential for incidents and performance (work efficiency) shortfalls.

[1]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[2]  Mahmood Shafiee,et al.  Risk analysis of maintenance ship collisions with offshore wind turbines , 2018 .

[3]  Linda de Vries,et al.  Work as Done? Understanding the Practice of Sociotechnical Work in the Maritime Domain: , 2017 .

[4]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 2011 .

[5]  Zahid H. Qureshi,et al.  A review of accident modelling approaches for complex socio-technical systems , 2007 .

[6]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Improving safety of DP operations: learning from accidents and incidents during offshore loading operations , 2017 .

[7]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[8]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  A systems approach to risk analysis of maritime operations , 2017 .

[9]  Gesa Praetorius,et al.  Modelling Vessel Traffic Service to understand resilience in everyday operations , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Sophia Antipolis,et al.  Proposing safety performance indicators for helicopter offshore on the Norwegian Continental Shelf , 2010 .

[11]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[12]  Christine Tomlinson,et al.  Drift into failure: from hunting broken components to understanding complex systems , 2012 .

[13]  H. Smalley The systems approach. , 1972, Hospitals.

[14]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management , 2014 .

[15]  John A. McDermid,et al.  The science and superstition of quantitative risk assessment , 2012 .

[16]  Riccardo Patriarca,et al.  Modelling complexity in everyday operations: functional resonance in maritime mooring at quay , 2017, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[17]  Adam Clayton Powell,et al.  Improving safety. , 2008, Nursing management.

[18]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[19]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance , 2006 .

[20]  Lee Grace,et al.  Cost Effective Offshore Concepts - Compact Semi-Submersible - A New Concept of Windfarm Service Operations Vessel , 2017 .

[21]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Drift into Failure: From Hunting Broken Components to Understanding Complex Systems , 2011 .

[22]  Dewan Ahsan,et al.  Why does the offshore wind industry need standardized HSE management systems? An evidence from Denmark , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[23]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP , 2012 .

[24]  Martin Höst,et al.  Comparison of the FMEA and STPA safety analysis methods–a case study , 2019, Software Quality Journal.

[25]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[26]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events , 2010 .

[27]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[28]  Romanas Puisa,et al.  Development of functional safety requirements for DP-driven servicing of wind turbines , 2020 .