2 Corinthians 11:22: Historical context, rhetoric, and ethnicity

In this article historical criticism, rhetorical criticism and ethnicity theory are combined to interpret Paul’s boasting about his ethnicity in 2 Corinthians 11:22. Partition theory helps to establish the historical/social context that 2 Corinthians 10-13 is a fragment of the “tearful letter,” which represented the low point (high conflict) of Paul’s relations with the Corinthians. Rhetoric ‐ the theatrical “Fool’s Speech,” which contains irony, self-praise, and comparison ‐ helps to understand Paul’s boastful argumentation in his selfdefence; and ethnicity theory helps to interpret Paul’s construction of his ethnic identity. Paul boasted of his ethnicity by taking up rhetorical comparison and self-praise. But he did so in the so-called “Fool’s Speech”, which is full of irony: his ethnic heritage was part of his argument that he was equal to that of his opponents, but ‐ here is the chief irony ‐ his ethnicity “in the flesh” ultimately meant nothing to him.

[1]  David F. Ford,et al.  Meaning And Truth In 2 Corinthians , 2008 .

[2]  Dennis C. Duling.  “Whatever gain I had ...”: Ethnicity and Paul's self-identification in Philippians 3:5-6 , 2008 .

[3]  Dennis C. Duling.  Ethnicity, Ethnocentrism, and the Matthean Ethnos , 2005 .

[4]  伊藤 明生.  書評 Ben Witherington 3 with Darlene Hyatt, Paul's Letter to the Romans: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids/ Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2004) , 2005 .

[5]  B. Thurston,et al.  Philippians and Philemon , 2005 .

[6]  F. J. Long.  Ancient Rhetoric and Paul's Apology: The Compositional Unity of 2 Corinthians , 2004 .

[7]  B. Witherington,et al.  Paul's letter to the Romans: a socio-rhetorical commentary , 2004 .

[8]  David R. Hall.  The unity of the Corinthian correspondence , 2003 .

[9]  J. Lambrecht.  The Fool's speech and its context : Paul's particular way of arguing in 2 Cor 10-13 , 2001 .

[10]  Philip Q. Yang.  Ethnic Studies: Issues and Approaches , 2000 .

[11]  S. Bartchy.  Undermining Ancient Patriarchy: The Apostle Paul's Vision of a Society of Siblings , 1999 .

[12]  L. Welborn.  The Runaway Paul , 1999, Harvard Theological Review.

[13]  Dennis C. Duling.  Matthew 18:15-17: Conflict, Confrontation, and Conflict Resolution in a "Fictive Kin" Association , 1999 .

[14]  W. Sollors.  Theories of Ethnicity: A Classical Reader , 1998 .

[15]  Dennis C. Duling.  "Egalitarian" Ideology, Leadership, and Factional Conflict within the Matthean Group , 1997 .

[16]  R. Jenkins.  Rethinking Ethnicity: Arguments and Explorations , 1997 .

[17]  Jonathan M. M. Hall.  Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity , 1997 .

[18]  L. Welborn.  Politics and rhetoric in the Corinthian Epistles , 1997 .

[19]  B. Malina,et al.  Portraits of Paul: An Archaeology of Ancient Personality , 1999 .

[20]  M. Brett.  Ethnicity and the Bible , 1996 .

[21]  T. Gillespie,et al.  St. Paul's Theology of Proclamation: 1 Corinthians 1-4 and Greco-Roman Rhetoric , 1996 .

[22]  T. B. Savage.  Power through Weakness: Paul's Understanding of the Christian Ministry in 2 Corinthians , 1995 .

[23]  B. Witherington.  Conflict and Community in Corinth: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on 1 and 2 Corinthians , 1995 .

[24]  L. Welborn.  The Identification of 2 Corinthians 10-13 with the ‘Letter of Tears’ , 1995 .

[25]  M. E. Thrall.  A critical and exegetical commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians , 1994 .

[26]  G. Strecker.  Die Legitimität des paulinischen Apostolates nach 2 Korinther 10–13 , 1992, New Testament Studies.

[27]  D. F. Watson,et al.  Logos and Sophia: The Rhetorical Situation of 1 Corinthians , 1992 .

[28]  Margaret M. Mitchell,et al.  Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians , 1991 .

[29]  G. Scott.  A resynthesis of the primordial and circumstantial approaches to ethnic group solidarity: Towards an explanatory model , 1990 .

[30]  S. Hafemann.  ‘Self-Commendation’ and Apostolic Legitimacy in 2 Corinthians: A Pauline Dialectic? , 1990, New Testament Studies.

[31]  L. Welborn.  Georgi's "Gegner": Reflections on the Occasion of Its Translation , 1988, The Journal of Religion.

[32]  J. Fitzgerald.  Cracks in an Earthen Vessel: An Examination of the Catalogues of Hardships in the Corinthian Correspondence , 1988 .

[33]  H. Kee,et al.  The Social world of formative Christianity and Judaism : essays in tribute to Howard Clark Kee , 1988 .

[34]  P. Marshall.  Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul's Relations with the Corinthians , 1987 .

[35]  J. O'connor.  Relating 2 Corinthians 6.14–7.1 to its Context , 1987, New Testament Studies.

[36]  C. H. Talbert.  Reading Corinthians: A Literary and Theological Commentary on 1 and 2 Corinthians , 1987 .

[37]  R. Jenkins.  Theories of Race and Ethnic Relations: Social anthropological models of inter-ethnic relations , 1986 .

[38]  P. Kivisto,et al.  Ethnic Groups in Conflict. , 1986 .

[39]  C. Forbes.  Comparison, Self-Praise and Irony: Paul's Boasting and the Conventions of Hellenistic Rhetoric , 1986, New Testament Studies.

[40]  H. Betz,et al.  2 Corinthians 8 and 9 , 1985 .

[41]  Francis Waston.  2 COR. X–XIII AND PAUL'S PAINFUL LETTER TO THE CORINTHIANS , 1984 .

[42]  J. Mckay.  An exploratory synthesis of primordial and mobilizationist approaches to ethnic phenomena , 1982 .

[43]  Josef Zmijewski.  Der Stil der paulinischen "Narrenrede" : Analyse d. Sprachgestaltung in 2 Kor 11, 1-12, 10 als Beitrag zur Methodik von Stiluntersuchungen neutestamentlicher Texte , 1981 .

[44]  A. Spencer.  The Wise Fool (and the Foolish Wise): A Study of Irony in Paul , 1981 .

[45]  E. Schürer.  The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ: Volume II , 1973 .

[46]  John J. Gunther.  2 Corinthians 6:14—7:1 , 1973 .

[47]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[48]  H. Windisch.  Der zweite Korintherbrief , 1970 .

[49]  D. Georgi.  Die Gegner des Paulus im 2. Korintherbrief : Studien zur religiösen Propaganda in der Spätantike , 1964 .

[50]  G. Bornkamm.  The History of the Origin of the So-Called Second Letter to the Corinthians , 1962, New Testament Studies.

[51]  Edward Shils,et al.  Primordial, Personal, Sacred and Civil Ties: Some Particular Observations on the Relationships of Sociological Research and Theory , 1957 .

[52]  C. H. Dodd.  The study of the New Testament , 1934 .

[53]  D. Walker.  The Second Epistle to the Corinthians , 1908 .