Mobility Support for the Routing Protocol in Low Power and Lossy Networks

Mobility is the most issues for the majority of protocols including the RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks). RPL a routing protocol standardized by IETF is usually used in Internet of Things Technology. It is proposed to support communications in Low power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). However, mobility limits the use of RPL protocol in realistic study. In this paper we have classify the mobility models in two entities in order to evaluate the performances of RPL in each entity separately. So we have defines two different scenarios. We first, evaluate characteristics of RPL with a group mobility models which contain Reference Point Mobility Model (RPGM) and Nomadic Mobility Model (Nomadic) Mobility Models. Then we give another evaluation of features of RPL with the Entity mobility models which contain Random Walk Mobility Model(RWK), Random Waypoint Mobility Models (RWP) and self similar least action walk (SLAW) Mobility models. The results show that the type of mobility models has a direct influence on the protocol performances. In addition, increasing of number of nodes causes an increasing of all parameters, especially in delivered and received data. Furthermore, the group mobility models give better metrics than entity mobility models in terms of lost packets, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and Throughput. Also, in each type of mobility models each model provides better metrics than others. RPG offers best number of lost packets and PDR than Nomadic model and lowest in terms of Throughput while SLAW models gives the best value in all metrics than RWK and RWP. Our simulation shows clearly that lost packets, PDR and Throughput are directly related to the type of mobility models.

[1]  Najah AbuAli,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a Routing Protocol for WSNs: RPL robustness under study , 2013, 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[2]  Hamid Aghvami,et al.  Cognitive Machine-to-Machine Communications for Internet-of-Things: A Protocol Stack Perspective , 2015, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[3]  Gennaro Boggia,et al.  Standardized Protocol Stack for the Internet of (Important) Things , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Toward ubiquitous mobility solutions for body sensor networks on healthcare , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Anurag Jain,et al.  Location based Energy Efficient Scheme for Maximizing Routing Capability of AODV Protocol in MANET , 2015 .

[6]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  A SURVEY OF MOBILITY MODELS in Wireless Adhoc Networks , 2004 .

[7]  Öznur Özkasap,et al.  A Classification and Performance Comparison of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Networks , 2006, ADHOC-NOW.

[8]  Elmar Gerhards-Padilla,et al.  BonnMotion: a mobility scenario generation and analysis tool , 2010, SimuTools.

[9]  Marco Conti,et al.  Reliable Data Delivery With the IETF Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[10]  Hugo V. Bitencourt,et al.  Simulation Domains for Networked Embedded Systems , 2012 .

[11]  A. Vasseur RPL : The IP routing protocol designed for low power and lossy networks Internet Protocol for Smart Objects ( IPSO ) , 2011 .

[12]  Fabrice Theoleyre,et al.  Using multiparent routing in RPL to increase the stability and the lifetime of the network , 2015, Ad Hoc Networks.

[13]  Manuel Ricardo,et al.  Energy-aware routing for biomedical wireless sensor networks , 2014, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[14]  Ahmed Yassin Al-Dubai,et al.  E-Trickle: Enhanced Trickle Algorithm for Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing.

[15]  S Patel Tushar,et al.  A Classification and Mobility Metrics of Various Mobility Models , 2013 .

[16]  Ahmed Yassin Al-Dubai,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the RPL Protocol in Fixed and Mobile Sink Low-Power and Lossy-Networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing.

[17]  Latif Ladid,et al.  Challenges of the Internet of Things: IPv6 and Network Management , 2014, 2014 Eighth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Xinbing Wang,et al.  Analysis of Random Walk Mobility Models with Location Heterogeneity , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[19]  Injong Rhee,et al.  SLAW: A New Mobility Model for Human Walks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[20]  Alberto Camacho Martínez Implementation and testing of LOADng: a routing protocol for WSN , 2012 .

[21]  Fabrice Theoleyre,et al.  Efficient topology construction for RPL over IEEE 802.15.4 in wireless sensor networks , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[22]  Marco Conti,et al.  The role of the RPL routing protocol for smart grid communications , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[23]  Fernando Boavida,et al.  A proposal for proxy-based mobility in WSNs , 2012, Comput. Commun..

[24]  Sapana Choudhary,et al.  A survey of Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) Networks Using NS-3 , 2015 .

[25]  Mohamed Khedr,et al.  Wireless Adhoc Multi Access Networks Optimization Using OSPF Routing Protocol Based on Cisco Devices , 2015 .

[26]  Antonio J. Jara,et al.  Performance assessment of the routing protocol for low power and lossy networks , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM).

[27]  Alhussein A. Abouzeid,et al.  RPL Based Routing for Advanced Metering Infrastructure in Smart Grid , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[28]  Jonathan Loo,et al.  The Impact of Rank Attack on Network Topology of Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[29]  Marcus Chang,et al.  MoMoRo: Providing Mobility Support for Low-Power Wireless Applications , 2015, IEEE Systems Journal.

[30]  Ahmed Yassin Al-Dubai,et al.  Performance Evaluation of RPL Objective Functions , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing.

[31]  Adam Dunkels,et al.  Powertrace: Network-level Power Profiling for Low-power Wireless Networks , 2011 .

[32]  J. Lastra,et al.  Application of 6 LoWPAN for the Real-Time Positioning of Manufacturing Assets , 2011 .