Shale/claystone response to air and liquid exposure, and implications for handling, sampling and testing

Abstract This paper documents the results of scientific studies to quantify the impact on shales and claystones of exposure to air, and to different liquids. These studies show that the water content of such rocks is controlled by the relative humidity of the surrounding air. Most shales/claystones will lose water, shrink and desaturate if exposed to air, unless the relative humidity is sufficiently high (usually 80–96%), causing desiccation damage. While exposure to brine will prevent desiccation, it results in water uptake and swelling, and a different type of alteration and damage. Confining stress will limit this swelling. Well-preserved shales are generally fully saturated under zero-stress conditions, but they have a negative pore water pressure. Hydrocarbon will not normally enter a fully saturated shale. Based on these findings, it is recommended that shale water content should not be altered unless it is done so under controlled conditions; to accomplish this one must minimize exposure to air, and avoid contact with water or brine unless the shale is under stress. Specific guidelines are provided for core handling and preservation, sampling, and testing. Gas shales are both similar to, and different than, claystone shales, and this alters slightly the findings and guidelines.

[1]  A. Tang,et al.  Water retention properties of the Callovo-Oxfordian claystone , 2013 .

[2]  C. F. Fonseca,et al.  The effect of total stress and temperature on the water activity of shales , 1998 .

[3]  C. Bardon Recommandations pour la détermination expérimentale de la capacité d'échange de cations des milieux argileux , 1983 .

[4]  E. van Oort,et al.  Manipulation of coupled osmotic flows for stabilisation of shales exposed to water-based drilling fluids , 1995 .

[5]  A. Tarantino Basic concepts in the mechanics and hydraulics of unsaturated geomaterials , 2010 .

[6]  Me Chenevert Me,et al.  Shale control with balanced- activity oil- continuous muds , 1970 .

[7]  L. Laloui,et al.  Experimental Techniques for Unsaturated Geomaterials , 2013 .

[8]  M. Chenevert,et al.  Shale preservation and testing techniques for borehole-stability studies , 2001 .

[9]  F. Amann,et al.  Water Retention Characteristics and State-Dependent Mechanical and Petro-Physical Properties of a Clay Shale , 2015, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[10]  Jianguo Zhang,et al.  Estimating the Reservoir Hydrocarbon Capacity Through Measurement of the Minimum Capillary Entry Pressure of Shale Caprocks , 2009 .

[11]  A. Aplin,et al.  A permeability–porosity relationship for mudstones , 2010 .

[12]  P. Marschall,et al.  Experimental analysis of the water retention behaviour of shales , 2014 .

[13]  R. Ewy Shale swelling/shrinkage and water content change due to imposed suction and due to direct brine contact , 2014 .

[14]  Ronald P. Steiger,et al.  Quantitative determination of the mechanical properties of shales , 1992 .

[15]  P. F. Low Physical Chemistry of Clay-Water Interaction , 1961 .

[16]  R. Ewy,et al.  Pore Pressure Change Due to Shale-Fluid Interactions: Measurements Under Simulated Wellbore Conditions , 2000 .

[17]  F. J. Santarelli,et al.  Shale testing and capillary phenomena , 1994 .

[18]  Jan Środoń,et al.  Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of clay-bearing rocks from random preparations , 2001 .

[19]  H. Einstein SUGGESTED METHODS FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF ARGILLACEOUS SWELLING ROCKS , 1989 .

[20]  M. Gasc-Barbier,et al.  Structural Modifications of a Hard Deep Clayey Rock due to Hygro-Mechanical Solicitations , 2007 .

[21]  P. Horsrud,et al.  Mechanical and petrophysical properties of North Sea shales , 1998 .