The role of port authorities in new intermodal service development; the case of Barcelona Port Authority

Abstract Improving intermodal connectivity is important for ports. However, developing new rail connections, especially in the contestable hinterland, is complex and requires substantial investments. Therefore, rail operators are reluctant to start new connections unless risks are limited. Port authorities can play a role in these hinterland connections to increase traffic to their ports. Barcelona is one of the leading port authorities in this respect, with a well developed hinterland strategy and a developing network of inland rail nodes. The Port Authority of Barcelona also invests in new rail shuttles, for instance between Barcelona and Lyon. This shuttle initiative is centre stage in this paper, as it may stand out as a best practise for port authority involvement in developing new rail connections. The paper starts with an introduction of the importance of intermodal transport for the development of hinterlands of ports. The second part will provide an overview of the hinterland strategy of Barcelona and describes in detail the participation of the port of Barcelona in the start-up phase of the intermodal connection to Lyon. The final section discusses the main conclusions from the case study with regard to the involvement of port authorities in the development of new intermodal transport services.

[1]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Collective action regimes in seaport clusters : the case of the lower Mississippi port cluster , 2005 .

[2]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development , 2005 .

[3]  B. Slack.  Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion? , 1999 .

[4]  T. Notteboom,et al.  The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships , 2009 .

[5]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[7]  Gordon Wilmsmeier,et al.  The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals , 2011 .

[8]  Alfred J. Baird,et al.  Comment Some reflections on port competition in the United States and western Europe , 1999 .

[9]  Brian Slack,et al.  Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global , 2005 .

[10]  M. Horst,et al.  Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community , 2008 .

[11]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Is intermodal freight transport more environmentally friendly than all-road freight transport? A review , 2003 .

[12]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[13]  A. Johne,et al.  New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography , 1998 .

[14]  A. Frémont,et al.  Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport , 2010 .

[15]  Pierre Franc,et al.  Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: a theoretical and empirical analysis , 2010 .

[16]  Jason Monios,et al.  The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports , 2011 .

[17]  E. Gouvernal,et al.  Container Railfreight Services in North‐west Europe: Diversity of Organizational Forms in a Liberalizing Environment , 2005 .

[18]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Economic analysis of the European seaport system , 2009 .

[19]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Port Economics, Policy and Management: Review of an Emerging Research Field , 2010 .

[20]  H. Arjen van Klink,et al.  Gateways and intermodalism , 1998 .

[21]  Claudio Ferrari,et al.  Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case , 2011 .

[22]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Inland Terminals, Regions and Supply Chains , 2009 .

[23]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Hinterland strategies of port authorities: A case study of the port of Barcelona , 2011 .

[24]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  de Pw Peter Langen,et al.  Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands; the case of Austria , 2007, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[26]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  Comparing maritime containers and semi-trailers in the context of hinterland transport by rail , 2011 .

[27]  T. Notteboom.  Container Shipping And Ports: An Overview , 2004 .

[28]  P. Verhoeven,et al.  A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance? , 2010 .