INTRODUCTIONTo achieve effective and efficient learning, student engagement is essential, but not easy to achieve (Micheletto, 2011; Wang, Shen, Novak, & Pan, 2009). In a classroom where the majority of the students are Chinese, the lack of student engagement is often an obstacle to achieving the learning outcomes (Wang et al., 2009). As digital technology continues to improve and become more economically viable to schools, many researches have been done to exploit technology to increase the student engagement (Hwang, Wu, Tseng, & Huang, 2011; Jungsun & Kizildag, 2011; Liu & Chen, 2015). Recently, many researches have focused on the use of SRS (Student Response Systems) in which the teacher can gather and summarise answers from students inside the classroom immediately (Carnaghan, Edmonds, Lechner, & Olds, 2011; Seamus McLoone, Villing, & O'Keeffe, 2015; Monk, Campbell, & Smala, 2013; Valle & Douglass, 2014). In a traditional SRS, the students use a small portal device, called a clicker, to choose their answers to questions. Then some proprietary software with summarise the responses from the students and display them on screen (Williams & Boyle, 2008).Many studies revealed that SRS are effective increasing student engaging and active learning (Cain, Black, & Rohr, 2009; Lindquist et al., 2007; Park, Nam, & Cha, 2012; Sad & Goktas, 2014). They are especially useful in creating a more engaging environment in a large lecture hall. The main benefit of using an SRS is that students are not afraid to answer questions because students can only see the statistics of the different answers, but not the individuals who gave the answers. However, using clickers means the school or the students have to purchase the hardware and software (Monk et al., 2013). Also, the clickers are usually small numeric keypads that have limited text entry capabilities. With the widespread use of smart mobile phones, it is possible to replace the clickers with mobile phones, and the proprietary software with commercially available polling website. The resulting system can be called a "mobile phone based SRS".If the mobile phone based SRS is technically feasible in a school and if students have positive perceptions of using such a system, then teachers can use it in class to increase student engagement and to identify individual students who are underperforming. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to perform a pilot study at a particular school, and then survey student perceptions to provide a reference to teachers at the same school for their decisions to use the system or not. The rest of this article is structured as follows. It starts with by reviewing the advantages mobile phones over the traditional methods of getting student feedback in the classroom. Then it reports the study that using an SRS that was created by combining a polling website with mobile phones of the students. Finally, it shows the results of a survey about the student's perception of the use of SRS. Lastly, some suggestions for future research in this area of mobile learning are suggested.MOBILE PHONES BASED SRS VERSUS TRADITIONAL QUESTIONING METHODSIn the tradition classroom where no technology is used, the teacher cannot get real-time feedback from all the students in the classroom. Typically, the teacher will ask some questions and request students to answer them verbally or raise their hands to choose their answers. Alternatively, the teacher may ask students to write down their answers on pieces of paper. These traditional methods have been used over a long period of time and can be used across many disciplines. Since no technology is involved, there is no computer knowledge or equipment requirement. However, this traditional method has some shortcomings that greatly reduce its effectiveness, especially in large lecture theatres.When the teacher wants to get qualitative answers from students, they would invite students to answer open-ended questions verbally. …
[1]
Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.
Development of a ubiquitous learning platform based on a real-time help-seeking mechanism
,
2011,
Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[2]
Sung-Ki Kim,et al.
Research on Educational Use of Smart-Phone Applications with Smart Clicker Technique
,
2014
.
[3]
Carol Withey.
Engaging students through electronic voting - clickers and mobile phone systems: PollEverywhere
,
2010
.
[4]
Carla Carnaghan,et al.
Using student response systems in the accounting classroom: Strengths, strategies and limitations
,
2011
.
[5]
William G. Griswold,et al.
Exploring the potential of mobile phones for active learning in the classroom
,
2007,
SIGCSE.
[6]
Adam Wong,et al.
Peer assessment and Computer Literacy for Junior High School Students in Geography Lessons in Hong Kong
,
2005
.
[7]
Rudi Villing,et al.
A Novel Smart Device Student Response System for Supporting High Quality Active Learning in the Engineering and Science Disciplines
,
2015
.
[8]
Stephen L. Cheung,et al.
Using Mobile Phone Messaging as a Response Medium in Classroom Experiments
,
2008
.
[9]
Minjuan Wang,et al.
The impact of mobile learning on students' learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom
,
2009,
Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[10]
Pei-Lin Liu,et al.
Learning English through actions: a study of mobile-assisted language learning
,
2015,
Interact. Learn. Environ..
[11]
Sung Youl Park,et al.
University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model
,
2012,
Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[12]
Süleyman Nihat Sad,et al.
Preservice teachers' perceptions about using mobile phones and laptops in education as mobile learning tools
,
2014,
Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[13]
Fred D. Davis,et al.
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
,
2000,
Management Science.
[14]
Simone Smala,et al.
Aligning pedagogy and technology: A case study using clickers in a first-year university education course
,
2013
.
[15]
Jeff Cain,et al.
An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.
,
2009,
American journal of pharmaceutical education.
[16]
Melinda J. Micheletto.
Using Audience Response Systems To Encourage Student Engagement And Reflection On Ethical Orientation And Behavior
,
2011
.
[17]
S. McLoone,et al.
A Smartphone-based Student Response System for Obtaining High Quality Real-time Feedback – Evaluated in an Engineering Mathematics Classroom
,
2015
.
[18]
Jungsun Kim,et al.
M‐learning: next generation hotel training system
,
2011
.
[19]
Brett Williams,et al.
The use of interactive wireless keypads for interprofessional learning experiences by undergraduate emergency health students
,
2008
.