Modeling Hydroclimatic Processes in Large Watersheds

Spatial and temporal differences in the processes that transform precipitation into runoff are a common source of error in watershed models. For large watersheds, spatial disaggregation of the drainage area can improve efforts to model the precipitation-runoff relationship when the model employs physically explainable variables to represent horizontal and vertical variations in moisture fluxes and storages. The paper presents the conceptual structure of a hydroclimatic model that simulates the runoff process as four functionally discrete subsystems linked in series. Moisture inputs are routed through each subsystem employing environmentally dictated rules and readily available data. Dividing the basin into homogeneous subunits addresses the problem of horizontal heterogeneity. Residence times for two groundwater storage subsystems are calculated by an optimization algorithm included in the model. Modeled hydroclimatic characteristics for the Deschutes River Basin in Oregon illustrate the ability of the model to reveal important spatial and temporal differences in the runoff process. Sectors representing 20 percent of the basin area contribute 57 percent of modeled ground-water recharge and 61 percent of total modeled runoff for the watershed, but some other sectors make a relatively small quantitative contribution to basin runoff. Moisture exchange processes in the basin display explicit seasonal characteristics that explain the surprisingly large proportion of annual precipitation allocated to groundwater recharge and the dampening of the seasonal moisture input by the groundwater storages. This knowledge of the basin runoff process provides a rational basis for formulating water management strategies for the watershed.

[1]  H. C. Troxell The influence of ground‐water storage on the runoff in the San Bernardino and eastern San Gabriel Mountains of Southern California , 1953 .

[2]  George Fleming,et al.  Computer simulation techniques in hydrology , 1975 .

[3]  J. K. Searcy Flow-duration curves , 1959 .

[4]  M. H. Diskin,et al.  A procedure for the selection of objective functions for hydrologic simulation models , 1977 .

[5]  C. Beaumont Stochastic hydrology—an update , 1980 .

[6]  James C. I. Dooge,et al.  Linear Theory of Hydrologic Systems , 1973 .

[7]  P. R. Johnston,et al.  Parameter optimization for watershed models , 1976 .

[8]  C. C. McDonald,et al.  Trends in runoff in the Pacific Northwest , 1948 .

[9]  C. W. Thornthwaite,et al.  Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance , 1955 .

[10]  A. M. Piper Runoff from rain and snow , 1948 .

[11]  R. Moore,et al.  A distribution function approach to rainfall runoff modeling , 1981 .

[12]  D. K. Todd Stream‐flow frequency distributions in California , 1953 .

[13]  F. Naef,et al.  Can we model the rainfall-runoff process today? , 1981 .

[14]  W. E. Hart,et al.  A critique of current methods in hydrologic systems investigation , 1964 .

[15]  M. Shelton RUNOFF AND LAND USE IN THE DESCHUTES BASIN , 1981 .

[16]  L. Bengtsson Groundwater and meltwater in the snowmelt induced runoff , 1982 .

[17]  V. Klemeš Conceptualization and scale in hydrology , 1983 .

[18]  C. W. Thornthwaite An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[19]  J. Mather USING COMPUTED STREAM FLOW IN WATERSHED ANALYSIS1 , 1981 .

[20]  L. D. James Hydrologic modeling, parameter estimation, and watershed characteristics , 1972 .

[21]  Venkateswararao Vemuri,et al.  ON THE SYSTEMS APPROACH IN HYDROLOGY , 1970 .

[22]  N. Crawford,et al.  DIGITAL SIMULATION IN HYDROLOGY' STANFORD WATERSHED MODEL 4 , 1966 .