The physics of bacterial decision making

The choice that bacteria make between sporulation and competence when subjected to stress provides a prototypical example of collective cell fate determination that is stochastic on the individual cell level, yet predictable (deterministic) on the population level. This collective decision is performed by an elaborated gene network. Considerable effort has been devoted to simplify its complexity by taking physics approaches to untangle the basic functional modules that are integrated to form the complete network: (1) A stochastic switch whose transition probability is controlled by two order parameters—population density and internal/external stress. (2) An adaptable timer whose clock rate is normalized by the same two previous order parameters. (3) Sensing units which measure population density and external stress. (4) A communication module that exchanges information about the cells' internal stress levels. (5) An oscillating gate of the stochastic switch which is regulated by the timer. The unique circuit architecture of the gate allows special dynamics and noise management features. The gate opens a window of opportunity in time for competence transitions, during which the circuit generates oscillations that are translated into a chain of short intervals with high transition probability. In addition, the unique architecture of the gate allows filtering of external noise and robustness against variations in circuit parameters and internal noise. We illustrate that a physics approach can be very valuable in investigating the decision process and in identifying its general principles. We also show that both cell-cell variability and noise have important functional roles in the collectively controlled individual decisions.

[1]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation , 2006, Nature.

[2]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  Genome sequence of the pattern forming Paenibacillus vortex bacterium reveals potential for thriving in complex environments , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[4]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Bacteria determine fate by playing dice with controlled odds , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Dissecting Timing Variability in Yeast Meiosis , 2007, Cell.

[6]  Jianhua Xing,et al.  Coupled reversible and irreversible bistable switches underlying TGFβ-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[7]  H. Vlamakis,et al.  Thinking about Bacillus subtilis as a multicellular organism. , 2007, Current opinion in microbiology.

[8]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression Determines Cell Fate in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Science.

[9]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Toward decoding the principles of cancer metastasis circuits. , 2014, Cancer research.

[10]  C. Morris,et al.  Bacterial Survival Strategies , 2004 .

[11]  Roberto Kolter,et al.  Extracellular signals that define distinct and coexisting cell fates in Bacillus subtilis. , 2010, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[12]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[13]  Oleg A. Igoshin,et al.  Non-transcriptional regulatory processes shape transcriptional network dynamics , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[14]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics , 2007, Science.

[15]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Turning Oscillations Into Opportunities: Lessons from a Bacterial Decision Gate , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[16]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  Turning death into creative force during biofilm engineering , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Bistability in the Bacillus subtilis K‐state (competence) system requires a positive feedback loop , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  MicroRNA-based regulation of epithelial–hybrid–mesenchymal fate determination , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Peter G. Wolynes,et al.  Deciding fate in adverse times: Sporulation and competence in Bacillus subtilis , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Molecular level stochastic model for competence cycles in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[22]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  Temporal competition between differentiation programs determines cell fate choice , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[23]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  TPR‐mediated interaction of RapC with ComA inhibits response regulator‐DNA binding for competence development in Bacillus subtilis , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Stochasticity and Cell Fate , 2008, Science.

[26]  J. Timmer,et al.  Design principles of a bacterial signalling network , 2005, Nature.

[27]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  Bacterial survival strategies suggest rethinking cancer cooperativity. , 2012, Trends in microbiology.

[28]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Construction of an effective landscape for multistate genetic switches. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[29]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  Biological role of noise encoded in a genetic network motif , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Architecture-Dependent Noise Discriminates Functionally Analogous Differentiation Circuits , 2009, Cell.

[31]  H. Swinney,et al.  Surviving Bacterial Sibling Rivalry: Inducible and Reversible Phenotypic Switching in Paenibacillus dendritiformis , 2011, mBio.

[32]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Deadly competition between sibling bacterial colonies , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[34]  J. Tyson,et al.  Design principles of biochemical oscillators , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[35]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[36]  Terrance Leighton,et al.  AbrB and Spo0E Control the Proper Timing of Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis , 2004, Current Microbiology.

[37]  Jingyu Zhang,et al.  TGF-β–induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition proceeds through stepwise activation of multiple feedback loops , 2014, Science Signaling.

[38]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  Tristability in cancer-associated microRNA-TF chimera toggle switch. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[39]  Oscar P. Kuipers,et al.  The Rok Protein of Bacillus subtilis Represses Genes for Cell Surface and Extracellular Functions , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[40]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Stochastic switching to competence. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.

[41]  E. Groisman,et al.  Making informed decisions: regulatory interactions between two-component systems. , 2003, Trends in microbiology.

[42]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Complexity in bacterial cell–cell communication: Quorum signal integration and subpopulation signaling in the Bacillus subtilis phosphorelay , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Oscar P Kuipers,et al.  Temporal separation of distinct differentiation pathways by a dual specificity Rap‐Phr system in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[44]  Oscar P Kuipers,et al.  Phosphatases modulate the bistable sporulation gene expression pattern in Bacillus subtilis , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[45]  A. Grossman,et al.  Conservation of genes and processes controlled by the quorum response in bacteria: characterization of genes controlled by the quorum‐sensing transcription factor ComA in Bacillus subtilis , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[46]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.