Influence of fMRI data sampling on the temporal characterization of the hemodynamic response

Experimental and modeling studies were used to estimate the effect of different sampling rates (repetition times, TR) and different sampling positions on the estimates of the temporal properties of the hemodynamic response function (HRF) derived from fMRI studies. Data were acquired at a TR of 250 ms and then subjected to various degrees of undersampling. Using a gaussian fitting function it is demonstrated that the accuracy of HRF peak time determination decreases with lower sampling rate (higher TR). The decrease in accuracy amounts to about 50 ms per second of TR increase. In addition, temporal shifts of the HRF peak time are found when reducing the influence of the more variable descending part of HRF curve by using a temporal cut-off after HRF peak time. The shift scales with TR, amounts up to 100 ms for a TR of 1500 ms and a cut-off of 3-4 s and depends on the sampling position. The use of the full HRF function does not lead to a shift but increases the influence of potential confounding factors as large veins and poststimulus undershoot. Since both accuracy and potential shifts of HRF peak determination scale with TR, it is important that temporal fMRI studies are carried out with high sampling rates.

[1]  M. Lowe,et al.  Spatially filtering functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  A. Dale,et al.  Late Onset of Anterior Prefrontal Activity during True and False Recognition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[3]  F Kruggel,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response in single‐trial functional MRI experiments , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Franklin Cl PICTURES IN THREE DIMENSIONS. , 1899 .

[5]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[6]  Matthew K. Belmonte,et al.  Permutation testing made practical for functional magnetic resonance image analysis , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  A M Dale,et al.  Event-related functional MRI: past, present, and future. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event-related fMRI , 1997 .

[9]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  S E Petersen,et al.  Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Temporal properties of the hemodynamic response in functional MRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[12]  R. Cox,et al.  Event‐related fMRI contrast when using constant interstimulus interval: Theory and experiment , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Michael Unser,et al.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Rapid self-paced event-related functional MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[16]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[17]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Effect of temporal autocorrelation due to physiological noise and stimulus paradigm on voxel‐level false‐positive rates in fMRI , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Scott L. Zeger,et al.  Non‐linear Fourier Time Series Analysis for Human Brain Mapping by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997 .

[19]  A M Dale,et al.  Estimation and detection of event‐related fMRI signals with temporally correlated noise: A statistically efficient and unbiased approach , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[21]  Richard Bowtell,et al.  Detecting activations in event‐related fMRI using analysis of variance , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Sequential activity in human motor areas during a delayed cued finger movement task studied by time‐resolved fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[23]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  Discrimination of Large Venous Vessels in Time‐Course Spiral Blood‐Oxygen‐Level‐Dependent Magnetic‐Resonance Functional Neuroimaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  J. Rajapakse,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:283–300(1998) � Modeling Hemodynamic Response for Analysis of Functional MRI Time-Series , 2022 .

[25]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Characterization of Cerebral Blood Oxygenation and Flow Changes during Prolonged Brain Activation , 2022 .

[27]  G. Krüger,et al.  Temporal characteristics of oxygenation‐sensitive MRI responses to visual activation in humans , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Hideaki Koizumi,et al.  Transient brain activity used in magnetic resonance imaging to detect functional areas , 1996, Neuroreport.

[29]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[30]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Mental chronometry using latency-resolved functional MRI. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  C. Starmer,et al.  Indicator Transit Time Considered as a Gamma Variate , 1964, Circulation research.

[33]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[34]  P. Bandettini The temporal resolution of Functional MRI , 1999 .

[35]  S Lai,et al.  Paradigm‐dependent modulation of event‐related fMRI activity evoked by the oddball task , 2001, Human brain mapping.