Recognizing Geomagnetic Storms in Marine Magnetometer Data: Toward Improved Archaeological Resource Identification Practices

Abstract Strong magnetic field perturbations resulting from Earth-directed solar events, collectively referred to as geomagnetic storms, can adversely affect many aspects of marine archaeological survey. The immediate onset of geomagnetic storms and the fast compression of the magnetopause creates a short-duration, high amplitude spike in Earth’s magnetic field that appears similar to the signature of an archaeological anomaly. Aggressive processing, analysis, and comparison of single instrument, total field marine magnetometer survey and observatory datasets collected during geomagnetic storms on days of Kp 5 or greater resulted in no demonstrable ability to isolate and remove the storm sudden onset signature. Of the 34 storms analyzed, 34 possessed onset signatures that were considered to be potentially misleading, resulting in possible aliasing of temporal variation (the storm sudden onset signature) for spatial variation (archaeological anomalies of interest). Based on a 95% confidence level, it is estimated that 89.7 to 100 percent of geomagnetic storms occurring on days of Kp 5 or greater will generate signatures that may be misinterpreted as archaeological sites. Recommendations are made for marine magnetic data collection and processing methods that may adequately account for geomagnetic storms, allowing for improved precision in analytical interpretation and thus improved management of archaeological resources.

[1]  Susan Macmillan Observatories : an overview , 2007 .

[2]  A Magnetometer Survey of the Knife River Indian Villages , 1977 .

[3]  S. Macmillan,et al.  Long-term trends in geomagnetic daily variation , 2007 .

[4]  Justin K. Dix,et al.  Marine Geophysics Data Acquisition, Processing and Interpretation , 2013 .

[5]  E. Fainberg Electromagnetic induction in the World Ocean , 1980 .

[6]  Gabor Toth,et al.  Community‐wide validation of geospace model ground magnetic field perturbation predictions to support model transition to operations , 2013 .

[7]  Marcello Ciminale,et al.  Aspects of magnetic data processing , 2001 .

[8]  Geoffrey Jones,et al.  Geophysical Survey as an Approach to the Ephemeral Campsite Problem: Case Studies from the Northern Plains , 2005 .

[9]  K. Kvamme Spatial Information Technologies and Landscape Archaeology: Past Problems and Future Directions , 2012 .

[10]  Determination of structure coefficients from splitting matrices , 2000 .

[11]  Brian Hamilton,et al.  The US/UK World Magnetic Model for 2010-2015 , 2010 .

[12]  J. C. Alldred A FLUXGATE GRADIOMETER FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEYING , 1964 .

[13]  J. B. Arnold,et al.  The magnetometer and underwater archaeology , 1976 .

[14]  Amy E.Mathews,et al.  Department of Commerce/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) , 1986, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Decorrugation, edge detection, and modelling of total field magnetic observations from a historic town site, Yellowstone National Park, USA , 2009 .

[16]  Jeffrey S. Alvey,et al.  Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective , 2007 .

[17]  Sheldon Breiner,et al.  Applications Manual for Portable Magnetometers , 1999 .

[18]  Avner Raban,et al.  Marine Magnetic Survey of a Submerged Roman Harbour, Caesarea Maritima, Israel , 2004 .

[19]  Michael Hesse,et al.  First-principles modeling of geomagnetically induced electromagnetic fields and currents from upstream solar wind to the surface of the Earth , 2007 .

[20]  S. Maus,et al.  Solar cycle dependence of quiet-time magnetospheric currents and a model of their near-Earth magnetic fields , 2010 .

[21]  Nils Olsen,et al.  Modeling the ocean effect of geomagnetic storms , 2004 .

[22]  Geomagnetic field, global pattern , 2011 .

[23]  Jun Korenaga,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of marine magnetic vector anomalies , 1995 .

[24]  S. Macmillan,et al.  Using observatory data to characterise geomagnetic daily variations , 2007 .

[25]  Robert A. Langel,et al.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field , 1992 .

[26]  R. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  A. Chulliat,et al.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the eleventh generation , 2010 .

[28]  William J. Emery,et al.  Data Processing and Presentation , 2014 .

[29]  E. Hall THE USE OF THE PROTON MAGNETOMETER IN UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY , 1966 .

[30]  Ross Johnson,et al.  Transverse Total Magnetic Field Gradiometer Marine Survey in Hawaii: The Quasi-Analytic Signal Approach and Multi-Channel Total Field DIPOLE MODELING , 2009 .

[31]  P. Rodriguez,et al.  An overview of the external magnetic field with regard to magnetic surveys , 1979 .

[32]  R. Huggins,et al.  Geophysical Surveying of Archaeological Sites , 1985 .