Comparison Of Pretrained Feature Extractors For Glaucoma Detection

Glaucoma identification is often performed manually by medical professionals, which is time consuming. Automated image analysis (e.g. of retinal fundus images) can speed up the detection and treatment of this disease. In this study, twentysix deep learning models pretrained for object recognition are compared as potential feature extractors for glaucoma detection from retinal fundus images. We used a template matching algorithm to automate the cropping around the optic nerve head at three different scales and extracted the features using pretrained networks from both cropped and full versions of the images. Cropped features were concatenated with full image features to create expanded feature sets. Next, we conducted extensive ten-fold cross-validation experiments using random forest and optimised logistic regression base classifiers to estimate the accuracy of models trained on each feature set individually and also on various combinations of feature sets from the full and cropped images. The best feature extractor for glaucoma detection was the residual network (ResNet) giving 0.97 cross validated AUC-ROC in conjunction with the random forest classifier using concatenated features. The experimental results indicate that ResNet architecture is best suited as a feature extractor for glaucoma identification from retinal fundus images, but only if two feature sets (full and cropped) are utilised.

[1]  Xiaoxiao Li,et al.  REFUGE Challenge: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Automated Methods for Glaucoma Assessment from Fundus Photographs , 2019, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  S. Dorairaj,et al.  Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis , 2017, BMC Ophthalmology.

[3]  T. Wong,et al.  Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[4]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[5]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Automated Diagnosis of Glaucoma Using Texture and Higher Order Spectra Features , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[6]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[7]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Glaucoma detection using entropy sampling and ensemble learning for automatic optic cup and disc segmentation , 2017, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[8]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning , 2016, AAAI.

[9]  Sushma G. Thorat Locating the Optic Nerve in a Retinal Image Using the Fuzzy Convergence of the Blood Vessels , 2014 .

[10]  B. Naveen Kumar,et al.  Detection of Glaucoma using image processing techniques: A review , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Microelectronics, Computing and Communications (MicroCom).

[11]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[12]  Shilpa Sameer Kanse,et al.  Retinal Fundus Image for Glaucoma Detection: A Review and Study , 2019, J. Intell. Syst..

[13]  Reda Alhajj,et al.  Glaucoma detection using image processing techniques: A literature review , 2019, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[14]  Sangsoo Kim,et al.  A deep learning model for the detection of both advanced and early glaucoma using fundus photography , 2018, PloS one.

[15]  Francisco Fumero,et al.  RIM-ONE: An open retinal image database for optic nerve evaluation , 2011, 2011 24th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS).

[16]  Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva,et al.  Glaucoma Diagnosis over Eye Fundus Image through Deep Features , 2018, 2018 25th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP).