A mixed methods contribution to the study of health public policies: complementarities and difficulties

The use of mixed methods (combining quantitative and qualitative data) is developing in a variety of forms, especially in the health field. Our own research has adopted this perspective from the outset. We have sought all along to innovate in various ways and especially to develop an equal partnership, in the sense of not allowing any single approach to dominate. After briefly describing mixed methods, in this article we explain and illustrate how we have exploited both qualitative and quantitative methods to answer our research questions, ending with a reflective analysis of our experiment.

[1]  Marie-Renée Guével,et al.  Recherche par les méthodes mixtes en santé publique : enjeux et illustration , 2012 .

[2]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[3]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[4]  L. Gilson,et al.  Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Social Science Matters , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[5]  P. Geissler,et al.  In/dependent Collaborations: Perceptions and Experiences of African Scientists in Transnational HIV Research , 2015, Medical anthropology quarterly.

[6]  I. Bhushan,et al.  Improving immunization equity through a public-private partnership in Cambodia. , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[7]  V. De Brouwere,et al.  The difficulty of questioning clinical practice: experience of facility‐based case reviews in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  J. Olivier,et al.  Interdisciplinarité et renouvellement de l’anthropologie africaniste : L’exemple de l’anthropologie médicale , 2013 .

[9]  J. Maxwell.  Using Qualitative Methods for Causal Explanation , 2004 .

[10]  V. Ridde,et al.  La recherche en santé mondiale et les défis des partenariats Nord-Sud , 2011 .

[11]  G. Poggi.  Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[12]  V. Ridde,et al.  User fees abolition policy in Niger: comparing the under five years exemption implementation in two districts. , 2011, Health policy.

[13]  V. Ridde,et al.  Contextual factors as a key to understanding the heterogeneity of effects of a maternal health policy in Burkina Faso? , 2015, Health policy and planning.

[14]  V. Ridde,et al.  [How the financial resources of health centre management committees in Burkina Faso can be used to improve equity of access to health care]. , 2010, Sante.

[15]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[16]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  The case study approach , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[17]  J. D. Sardan,et al.  Abolishing user fees for patients in West Africa : lessons for public policy , 2013 .

[18]  J. O. D. Sardan,et al.  Une médecine inhospitalière : les difficiles relations entre soignants et soignés dans cinq capitales d'Afrique de l'Ouest , 2003 .

[19]  V. Ridde,et al.  [Pragmatism and realism for public health intervention evaluation]. , 2013, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[20]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[21]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  7. Les méthodes mixtes , 2012 .

[22]  James Mahoney,et al.  A tale of two cultures: qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences and Social science concepts: a user's guide and Explaining war and peace: case studies and necessary condition counterfactuals and Case studies, causal mechanisms, and selecting cases , 2015 .

[23]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[24]  E. Morin,et al.  La rumeur d'Orléans , 1969 .

[25]  Bruno Latour,et al.  « Les “vues” de l’esprit ». Une introduction à l’anthropologie des sciences et des techniques , 2006 .

[26]  G. Regehr,et al.  Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[27]  [Pragmatism and realism for public health intervention evaluation]. , 2013, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[28]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[29]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[30]  Harald Sætren,et al.  Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out‐of‐Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant , 2005 .

[31]  V. Ridde,et al.  Expériences connues, vécues… mais rarement écrites : à propos des relations de partenariat Nord-Sud , 2013 .

[32]  V. Ridde,et al.  La charge de travail des agents de santé dans un contexte de gratuité des soins au Burkina Faso et au Niger , 2013 .

[33]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[34]  Sunny S. Kim,et al.  Learning How Programs Achieve their Impact: Embedding Theory-Driven Process Evaluation and Other Program Learning Mechanisms in Alive & Thrive , 2013, Food and nutrition bulletin.

[35]  David McDonald,et al.  Realworld Evaluation: Working under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints , 2007 .

[36]  L. Vidal.  Faire de l'anthropologie : santé, science et développement , 2010 .

[37]  Xavier Guchet.  Culture et technique , 2010 .

[38]  V. Ridde,et al.  Burkina Faso : la gratuité des soins aux dépens de la relation entre les femmes et les soignants ? , 2013 .

[39]  M. Gruénais.  L’anthropologie sociale est-elle inapplicable ?. L’exemple d’une « socio-anthropologie » dans les programmes de santé publique , 2012 .

[40]  A. Ager,et al.  Balancing the personal, local, institutional, and global: multiple case study and multidimensional scaling analysis of African experiences in addressing complexity and political economy in health research capacity strengthening , 2015, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[41]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  A. George,et al.  People-centred science: strengthening the practice of health policy and systems research , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[43]  Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan,et al.  Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology , 2015 .

[44]  Sachiko Ozawa,et al.  10 best resources on ... mixed methods research in health systems. , 2014, Health policy and planning.

[45]  Alexander C Wagenaar,et al.  Using routine health information systems for well-designed health evaluations in low- and middle-income countries. , 2016, Health policy and planning.

[46]  J. Passeron.  Le raisonnement sociologique : un espace non poppérien de l'argumentation , 2006 .

[47]  S. Haddad,et al.  Improving equity by removing healthcare fees for children in Burkina Faso , 2013, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[48]  K. Kadio,et al.  Why do women pay more than they should? A mixed methods study of the implementation gap in a policy to subsidize the costs of deliveries in Burkina Faso. , 2013, Evaluation and program planning.

[49]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  Les méthodes mixtes pour l’évaluation des programmes , 2009 .

[50]  Michael Bamberger,et al.  INTRODUCTION TO MIXED METHODS IN IMPACT EVALUATION , 2012 .

[51]  Bruno Latour,et al.  LES «VUES» DE L'ESPRIT , 1985 .

[52]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  Understanding divergence of quantitative and qualitative data (or results) in mixed methods studies , 2009 .