Surface features of utterances, credibility judgments, and memory

Information acquired in conversation is often not credible, which makes monitoring its credibility critical. Listeners of conversations often use surface features of utterances, such as pause and intonation, to guide their credibility judgments. In this research, we explore whether listeners’ delayed credibility judgments about remembered information are affected by the surface features of the speakers’ utterances. In addition, we examine some of the specific factors involved in this issue: (1) how listeners’ listening strategies influence their subsequent credibility judgments and (2) how the type of surface features of the utterances influences listeners’ ability to make delayed credibility judgments. The results indicate that intonation of the utterances continues to influence listeners’ assessment of the credibility of remembered information, that the influences of intonation depend on listening strategies, and that people have difficulty using/remembering pause length when making a delayed credibility judgment. The implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  L. Reder.  Strategy selection in question answering , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[4]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[5]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences , 2003 .

[6]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Disfluencies Signal Theee, Um, New Information , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[7]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Episodic memory for musical prosody. , 2001 .

[8]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Experiments on mass communication, Vol. 3. , 1949 .

[9]  Robert G. Crowder,et al.  Prosodic Structure and Sentence Recognition , 1993 .

[10]  A P Shimamura,et al.  On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  A P Shimamura,et al.  Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse , 1989 .

[13]  S. Brennan,et al.  THE FEELING OF ANOTHER'S KNOWING : PROSODY AND FILLED PAUSES AS CUES TO LISTENERS ABOUT THE METACOGNITIVE STATES OF SPEAKERS , 1995 .

[14]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Surface information loss in comprehension , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation , 1977 .

[16]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[17]  M. Zaragoza,et al.  Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  H. H. Clark,et al.  On the Course of Answering Questions , 1993 .

[19]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. , 1987 .

[20]  L A Streeter,et al.  Pitch changes during attempted deception. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  W. Hirst,et al.  How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Bennett L. Schwartz,et al.  Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Experiments On Mass Communication , 1949 .

[24]  K. Pezdek,et al.  Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect , 1998 .

[25]  J. Bransford,et al.  Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach ☆ ☆☆ , 1972 .

[26]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints , 1980 .

[27]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[28]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[29]  Daniel C. O'Connell,et al.  How do transcribers deal with audio recordings of spoken discourse? , 1995 .

[30]  D. Schacter.  Implicit memory: History and current status. , 1987 .

[31]  G. Murphy,et al.  Forgetting of verbatim information in discourse , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Nicholas Christenfeld.  Does it hurt to say um? , 1995 .

[33]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Verbatim and Propositional Representation of Sentences in Immediate and Long-Term Memory. , 1974 .

[34]  F. Craik,et al.  The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .

[35]  J. E. Tree.  Listeners' uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. , 2001 .

[36]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the tobi framework , 1994, ICSLP.

[37]  James G. Martin,et al.  The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech , 1968 .

[38]  D. Barr.  Paralinguistic correlates of conceptual structure , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  S. Brennan,et al.  How Listeners Compensate for Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech , 2001 .

[40]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. , 1978 .

[41]  T. Holtgraves.  Politeness and memory for the wording of remarks , 1997, Memory & cognition.