Genome-wide association and genomic selection in animal breeding.

Results from genome-wide association studies in livestock, and humans, has lead to the conclusion that the effect of individual quantitative trait loci (QTL) on complex traits, such as yield, are likely to be small; therefore, a large number of QTL are necessary to explain genetic variation in these traits. Given this genetic architecture, gains from marker-assisted selection (MAS) programs using only a small number of DNA markers to trace a limited number of QTL is likely to be small. This has lead to the development of alternative technology for using the available dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) information, called genomic selection. Genomic selection uses a genome-wide panel of dense markers so that all QTL are likely to be in linkage disequilibrium with at least one SNP. The genomic breeding values are predicted to be the sum of the effect of these SNPs across the entire genome. In dairy cattle breeding, the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) that can be achieved and the fact that these are available early in life have lead to rapid adoption of the technology. Here, we discuss the design of experiments necessary to achieve accurate prediction of GEBV in future generations in terms of the number of markers necessary and the size of the reference population where marker effects are estimated. We also present a simple method for implementing genomic selection using a genomic relationship matrix. Future challenges discussed include using whole genome sequence data to improve the accuracy of genomic selection and management of inbreeding through genomic relationships.

[1]  N. Yi,et al.  Bayesian LASSO for Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping , 2008, Genetics.

[2]  L. D. Van Vleck,et al.  Genetic change in milk yield estimated from simultaneous genetic evaluation of bulls and cows. , 1986, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  W. Cowling,et al.  Prospects and challenges for genome-wide association and genomic selection in oilseed Brassica species. , 2010, Genome.

[4]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Incorporating Desirable Genetic Characteristics From an Inferior Into a Superior Population Using Genomic Selection , 2009, Genetics.

[5]  J. A. Arendonk,et al.  Utilisation of genetic variation by marker assisted selection in commercial dairy cattle populations , 1999 .

[6]  Michael E Goddard,et al.  Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. , 2009, Genetics research.

[7]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[8]  P. Visscher,et al.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. , 2009, Genetics research.

[9]  Robert D Schnabel,et al.  Genome-Wide Survey of SNP Variation Uncovers the Genetic Structure of Cattle Breeds , 2009, Science.

[10]  D. Falk Generating and maintaining diversity at the elite level in crop breeding. , 2010, Genome.

[11]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  C. Darwin The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1859 .

[13]  Empowering international canine inherited disorder management , 2012, Mammalian Genome.

[14]  C. R. Henderson Applications of linear models in animal breeding , 1984 .

[15]  M. Calus,et al.  Accuracy of Genomic Selection Using Different Methods to Define Haplotypes , 2008, Genetics.

[16]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[17]  M. Goddard,et al.  A Validated Genome Wide Association Study to Breed Cattle Adapted to an Environment Altered by Climate Change , 2009, PloS one.

[18]  Peter M Visscher,et al.  Sizing up human height variation , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[19]  M. Goddard,et al.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  R. Spelman,et al.  Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. , 2009 .

[21]  R. Fernando,et al.  The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values , 2007, Genetics.

[22]  K. Lindblad-Toh,et al.  Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[23]  T. Meuwissen Towards consensus on how to measure neutral genetic diversity? , 2009, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[24]  L R Schaeffer,et al.  Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. , 2006, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[25]  M. Goddard Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response , 2009, Genetica.

[26]  Merete Fredholm,et al.  Highly effective SNP-based association mapping and management of recessive defects in livestock , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[27]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  Shizhong Xu,et al.  Genomewide Analysis of Epistatic Effects for Quantitative Traits in Barley , 2007, Genetics.

[29]  R. Fernando,et al.  Genomic-Assisted Prediction of Genetic Value With Semiparametric Procedures , 2006, Genetics.

[30]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[31]  M. Goddard,et al.  Genomic selection based on dense genotypes inferred from sparse genotypes. , 2009 .

[32]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  Common variants in the GDF5-UQCC region are associated with variation in human height , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[33]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Factors Affecting Accuracy From Genomic Selection in Populations Derived From Multiple Inbred Lines: A Barley Case Study , 2009, Genetics.

[34]  Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. , 2002 .

[35]  M. Goddard,et al.  Accuracy of genomic selection: comparing theory and results , 2009 .

[36]  Hans D. Daetwyler,et al.  Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach , 2008, PloS one.

[37]  G. B. Havenstein,et al.  Carcass composition and yield of 1991 vs 1957 broilers when fed "typical" 1957 and 1991 broiler diets. , 1994, Poultry science.

[38]  B. Larson,et al.  Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 vs 1991 broilers when fed "typical" 1957 and 1991 broiler diets. , 1994, Poultry science.

[39]  M. Goddard,et al.  Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  J. Sved Linkage disequilibrium and homozygosity of chromosome segments in finite populations. , 1971, Theoretical population biology.

[41]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes , 1996, Genetics Selection Evolution.