Fault Slip Distribution of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Estimated from Satellite Radar and GPS Measurements

We use a combination of satellite radar and GPS data to estimate the slip distribution of the 1999 M w 7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake, a right-lateral strikeslip earthquake that occurred on a northwest–southeast striking fault in the southern California Mojave Desert. The data include synthetic aperture radar interferograms (InSAR) from both ascending and descending orbits, radar amplitude image offset fields (SARIO) for both ascending and descending azimuth directions, and campaign GPS observations from 55 stations provided by Agnew et al. (2002). We model the fault with nine segments derived from the field-mapped fault rupture, the SARIO data, and aftershock locations. We first estimate the dip of each fault segment, as well as a single constant strike-slip component across each segment, resulting in an average dip of 83° to the northeast and slip of up to 5.6 m. Then, we fix the optimal fault segment dip, discretize the fault segments into 1.5 km × 1.5 km patches, and solve for the variable slip distribution using a nonnegative least-squares method that includes an appropriate degree of smoothing. Our preferred solution has both right-lateral strike-slip and reverse faulting. The estimated geodetic moment is 5.93 × 10 19 N m ( M w 7.1), similar to seismological estimates, indicating that there are insignificant interseismic and postseismic deformation signals in the data. We find strike-slip displacements of up to 6.0 m and reverse faulting of up to 1.6 m, with the maximum slip located just northwest of the epicenter. Most of the slip is concentrated northwest and south of the epicenter; little slip is found on the northeastern branch of the fault. The SARIO data and our modeling indicate that the amount and extent of surface fault rupture were underestimated in the field.

[1]  C. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[2]  Y. Okada Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  K. Feigl,et al.  The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry , 1993, Nature.

[4]  Charles Werner,et al.  On the derivation of coseismic displacement fields using differential radar interferometry: The Landers earthquake , 1994 .

[5]  Paul Rosen,et al.  Postseismic Rebound in Fault Step-Overs Caused by Pore Fluid Flow , 1996, Science.

[6]  Kanamori,et al.  Viscoelastic flow in the lower crust after the 1992 landers, california, earthquake , 1998, Science.

[7]  Jean Taboury,et al.  Measuring near field coseismic displacements from SAR images: Application to the Landers Earthquake , 1999 .

[8]  S. Welstead Fractal and Wavelet Image Compression Techniques , 1999 .

[9]  Jean Taboury,et al.  Measuring ground displacements from SAR amplitude images: Application to the Landers Earthquake , 1999 .

[10]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Contribution of radar interferometry to a two-step inversion of the kinematic process of the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1999 .

[11]  Peltzer,et al.  Evidence of Nonlinear Elasticity of the Crust from the Mw7.6 Manyi (Tibet) Earthquake. , 1999, Science.

[12]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Preliminary Report on the 16 October 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake , 2000 .

[13]  Douglas S. Dreger,et al.  Seismic remote sensing for the earthquake source process and near‐source strong shaking: A case study of the October 16, 1999 Hector Mine earthquake , 2000 .

[14]  D. Dreger,et al.  Static‐stress impact of the 1992 Landers earthquake sequence on nucleation and slip at the site of the 1999 M=7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, southern California , 2000 .

[15]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  The coseismic geodetic signature of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake , 2000 .

[16]  C. W. Chen,et al.  Two-dimensional phase unwrapping with use of statistical models for cost functions in nonlinear optimization. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  Jian Lin,et al.  Delayed triggering of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake by viscoelastic stress transfer , 2001, Nature.

[18]  Yuehua Zeng,et al.  Viscoelastic stress‐triggering of the 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake by the 1992 Landers Earthquake , 2001 .

[19]  Paul Segall,et al.  Estimating source parameters from deformation data, with an application to the March 1997 earthquake swarm off the Izu Peninsula, Japan , 2001 .

[20]  D. Dreger,et al.  The Combined Inversion of Seismic and Geodetic Data for the Source Process of the 16 October 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake , 2002 .

[21]  E. Hauksson,et al.  The 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake Sequence: Complex Conjugate Strike-Slip Faulting , 2002 .

[22]  Duncan Carr Agnew,et al.  Coseismic Displacements from the Hector Mine, California, Earthquake: Results from Survey-Mode Global Positioning System Measurements , 2002 .