RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving

This is the first of a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC‐funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open‐archiving) which investigated the IPR issues relating to academic author self‐archiving of research papers. It considers the claims for copyright ownership in research papers by universities, academics, and publishers by drawing on the literature, a survey of 542 academic authors and an analysis of 80 journal publisher copyright transfer agreements. The paper concludes that self‐archiving is not best supported by copyright transfer to publishers. It recommends that universities assert their interest in copyright ownership in the long term, that academics retain rights in the short term, and that publishers consider new ways of protecting the value they add through journal publishing.

[1]  J. Eric Davies.  Policy Approaches to Copyright in HEIs: A Study for the JISC Committee on Awareness, Liaison and Training , 2001 .

[2]  François van Schalkwyk.  Beyond copyright: Reconsidering the author/ publisher/reader relationship , 1998 .

[3]  Lois Ann Colaianni,et al.  UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS , 2000 .

[4]  Kieron Flanagan,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Purchase, Management and Use of Large-scale Research Equipment in the UK and US Universities (report for Evidence Ltd on behalf of the Higher Education Funding Council for England) , 2002 .

[5]  Jean-Claude Guédon,et al.  In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing , 2005 .

[6]  John Willinsky,et al.  Copyright Contradictions in Scholarly Publishing , 2002, First Monday.

[7]  Steve Lawren.  Online or invisible ? , 2001 .

[8]  Kenneth D. Crews,et al.  Copyright, Fair Use, and the Challenge for Universities: Promoting the Progress of Higher Education , 1985 .

[9]  Sanjeev R. Kulkarni.  All Professors Create Equally: Why Faculty Should Have Complete Control Over the Intellectual Proper , 1995 .

[10]  Don Revill.  Clearing the Way: Copyright Clearance in UK Libraries , 2002 .

[11]  Pieter Bolman.  Open Access: what does it mean for STI distribution? , 2003 .

[12]  Jens Bammel.  The Publisher - Author Relationship Principles of Good Practice in Scholarly Journal Publishing , 1999, Learn. Publ..

[13]  Sally Morris.  Authors and copyright , 2000, Learn. Publ..

[14]  Alma Swan,et al.  ‘WHAT AUTHORS WANT’: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals , 1999, Learn. Publ..

[15]  Peter Suber.  Removing the Barriers to Research: An Introduction to Open Access for Librarians , 2003 .

[16]  Derek G. Law,et al.  Universities and article copyright , 2001, Learn. Publ..

[17]  Employment,et al.  Opportunity for all in a world of change , 2001 .

[18]  Jane C. Ginsburg,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights in an Electronic Environment , 2000 .

[19]  M. Rose.  Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright , 1993 .

[20]  Tom Schuller,et al.  The Future of Higher Education. , 1991 .

[21]  Stevan Harnad.  For Whom the Gate Tolls? How and Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/Institution Self-Archiving, Now. , 2001 .

[22]  J P Kassirer,et al.  The Ingelfinger Rule revisited. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  A. Williamson,et al.  Journal Publishing , 1997 .

[24]  Hazel Carty,et al.  Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 , 1989 .

[25]  S. Lawrence.  Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact , 2001, Nature.

[26]  Raym Crow,et al.  The case for institutional repositories : a SPARC position paper , 2002 .