Reliability of MRI-derived cortical and subcortical morphometric measures: Effects of pulse sequence, voxel geometry, and parallel imaging

Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have contributed greatly to the study of neurodegenerative processes, psychiatric disorders, and normal human development, but the effect of such improvements on the reliability of downstream morphometric measures has not been extensively studied. We examined how MRI-derived neurostructural measures are affected by three technological advancements: parallel acceleration, increased spatial resolution, and the use of a high bandwidth multiecho sequence. Test-retest data were collected from 11 healthy participants during 2 imaging sessions occurring approximately 2 weeks apart. We acquired 4 T1-weighted MP-RAGE sequences during each session: a non-accelerated anisotropic sequence (MPR), a non-accelerated isotropic sequence (ISO), an accelerated isotropic sequence (ISH), and an accelerated isotropic high bandwidth multiecho sequence (MEM). Cortical thickness and volumetric measures were computed for each sequence to assess test-retest reliability and measurement bias. Reliability was extremely high for most measures and similar across imaging parameters. Significant measurement bias was observed, however, between MPR and all isotropic sequences for all cortical regions and some subcortical structures. These results suggest that these improvements in MRI acquisition technology do not compromise data reproducibility, but that consistency should be maintained in choosing imaging parameters for structural MRI studies.

[1]  D. Salat,et al.  Detection of entorhinal layer II using Tesla magnetic resonance imaging , 2005 .

[2]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Detection of cortical thickness correlates of cognitive performance: Reliability across MRI scan sessions, scanners, and field strengths , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  J. Mugler,et al.  Rapid three‐dimensional T1‐weighted MR imaging with the MP‐RAGE sequence , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: The effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  Hae-Jeong Park,et al.  SENSE factors for reliable cortical thickness measurement , 2008, NeuroImage.

[13]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  k‐t BLAST and k‐t SENSE: Dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  R. Turner,et al.  Optimization of 3D MP-RAGE sequences for structural brain imaging , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  M. McDougall,et al.  64‐channel array coil for single echo acquisition magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R. Turner,et al.  Optimization of 3-D MP-RAGE Sequences for Structural Brain Imaging , 2000, NeuroImage.

[17]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  D. Salat,et al.  Detection of entorhinal layer II using 7Tesla [corrected] magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[19]  W. Edelstein,et al.  The intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio in NMR imaging , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  P. Börnert,et al.  Transmit SENSE , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  J W Carlson,et al.  Imaging time reduction through multiple receiver coil data acquisition and image reconstruction , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[24]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE , 2008, NeuroImage.

[25]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[26]  Syuichi Tonami,et al.  [Effects of the volume and shape of voxels on the measurement of phantom volume using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging]. , 2002, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi.