Sensor Service Selection through Switch Options

Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) for sensor network applications aims at providing composable sensor network services supporting functionality within a specific application domain together with tools for service composition, so more complex functionalities can be composed of component services. In a distributed environment, such a scheme works by having a given component service choose other components that provide the data that it needs to perform its service. In this paper, we propose to use real options theory for selecting component services. Real options are designed to reduce the risk associated with an investment by delaying the investment decision for a certain period of time or by allowing for the substitutions of initial investment. Thus, they enhance managerial flexibility and add to the overall value of a project but at the same time they incur certain costs. It is natural to think about activated services as investments, and we apply the switch options subset of the real options methodology to manage the risks of high cost that may result from the low reliability of sensors and sensor networks. Furthermore, we compare our approach with several service selection methods and show the advantage of the option-based methodology.

[1]  Richard Goodwin,et al.  Shared Services Transformation: Conceptualization and Valuation from the Perspective of Real Options , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[2]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[3]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Dynamic Composition of Services in Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.

[4]  Heonshik Shin,et al.  Reconfigurable Service Composition and Categorization for Power-Aware Mobile Computing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[5]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Sensors as a Service Oriented Architecture: Middleware for Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Environments.

[6]  S. Myers Determinants of corporate borrowing , 1977 .

[7]  J. Michael Harrison,et al.  Multi-Resource Investment Strategies: Operational Hedging Under Demand Uncertainty , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  A Case for Using Real Options Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Thomas Risse,et al.  Combining global optimization with local selection for efficient QoS-aware service composition , 2009, WWW '09.

[10]  Vana Kalogeraki,et al.  Adaptive component composition and load balancing for distributed stream processing applications , 2009, Peer Peer Netw. Appl..

[11]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Building principles for a quality of information specification for sensor information , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[12]  Mohan Kumar,et al.  Dynamic Service Composition in Pervasive Computing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[13]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Valuing the flexibility of flexible manufacturing systems , 1988 .

[14]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Real Options and Investment under Uncertainty: Classical Readings and Recent Contributions , 2004 .

[15]  D. Siegel,et al.  Option Valuation of Claims on Real Assets: The Case of Offshore Petroleum Leases , 1988 .

[16]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual organization: toward a theory of societal transformation stimulated by information technology , 2003, UBIQ.

[17]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Auction-based congestion management for target tracking in wireless sensor networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.

[18]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Abbe Mowshowitz On the market value of information commodities. III. Demand price , 1992 .