An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity

Research integrity and misconduct have recently risen to public attention as policy issues. Concern has arisen about divergence between this policy discourse and the language and concerns of scientists. This interview study, carried out in Denmark with a cohort of highly internationalised natural scientists, explores how researchers talk about integrity and good science. It finds, first, that these scientists were largely unaware of the Danish Code of Conduct for Responsible Conduct of Research and indifferent towards the value of such codes; second, that they presented an image of good science as nuanced and thereby as difficult to manage through abstracted, principle-based codes; and third, that they repeatedly pointed to systemic issues both as triggering misconduct and as ethical problems in and of themselves. Research integrity is framed as a part of wider moves to ‘responsibilise’ science; understood in these terms, resistance to codes of conduct and the representation of integrity as a problem of science as a whole can be seen as a rejection of a neoliberal individualisation of responsibility.

[1]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research , 2006, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[2]  S. P. J. M. Horbach,et al.  Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’ , 2016, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[3]  Håkan Salwén,et al.  The Swedish Research Council’s Definition of ‘Scientific Misconduct’: A Critique , 2015, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[4]  J. Law.  After Method: Mess in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[5]  Kris Dierickx,et al.  Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[6]  Criss Shore.  Audit culture and Illiberal governance , 2008 .

[7]  Johanna Hakala,et al.  The future of the academic calling? Junior researchers in the entrepreneurial university , 2009 .

[8]  Roger Strand,et al.  Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch , 2011, Nanoethics.

[9]  S. Ball.  Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University , 2012 .

[10]  Shannon L. Spruit,et al.  Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize , 2016, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[11]  A. Rip.  Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists , 2006, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[12]  Thomas Arrison,et al.  FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH , 2017 .

[13]  How we talk when we talk about nano: The future in laypeople's talk , 2011 .

[14]  A. Irwin.  The Politics of Talk , 2006 .

[15]  B. Penders,et al.  A question of style: method, integrity and the meaning of proper science. , 2009, Endeavour.

[16]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications , 2018, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[17]  Latifah Amin,et al.  In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[18]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  Co-responsibility for research integrity , 2003, Science and engineering ethics.

[19]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  The Importance of Organizational Justice in Ensuring Research Integrity , 2010, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[20]  S. Davies,et al.  ‘Nothing really responsible goes on here’: scientists’ experience and practice of responsibility , 2017 .

[21]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data , 1993 .

[22]  Barbel R. Dorbeck-Jung,et al.  Meta-Regulation and Nanotechnologies: The Challenge of Responsibilisation Within the European Commission’s Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research , 2013 .

[23]  C. Marris,et al.  Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations: Reflections on working in post-ELSI spaces in the UK synthetic biology community , 2015 .

[24]  Ruth Müller,et al.  Racing for What? Anticipation and Acceleration in the Work and Career Practices of Academic Life Science Postdocs , 2014 .

[25]  David B. Resnik,et al.  From Baltimore to Bell Labs: Reflections on Two Decades of Debate about Scientific Misconduct , 2003, Accountability in research.

[26]  Simone Rödder,et al.  Fraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media , 2007, EMBO reports.

[27]  Marilyn Strathern,et al.  Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy , 2000 .

[28]  Megan R. Turner,et al.  To Whistleblow or Not to Whistleblow: Affective and Cognitive Differences in Reporting Peers and Advisors , 2019, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[29]  N. Fairclough.  Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research , 2003 .

[30]  Logan L. Watts,et al.  Effective Practices in the Delivery of Research Ethics Education: A Qualitative Review of Instructional Methods , 2017, Accountability in research.

[31]  J. Wessels,et al.  Fostering Research Integrity through Institutional Policies: The Case of a Selected Institution of Higher Education , 2015 .

[32]  Martyn Pickersgill,et al.  The Co-production of Science, Ethics, and Emotion , 2012 .

[33]  D. Shaw,et al.  Researchers’ interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study , 2018, Accountability in research.

[34]  Noortje Marres,et al.  The Issues Deserve More Credit , 2007 .

[35]  P. Macnaghten,et al.  Narrative, Nanotechnology and the Accomplishment of Public Responses: a Response to Thorstensen , 2014 .

[36]  C. Shore,et al.  Responsibilisation and leadership in the neoliberal university: a New Zealand perspective , 2017, Responsibility and Responsibilisation in Education.

[37]  R. V. Schomberg.  A vision of Responsible Innovation , 2013 .

[38]  Sarah Hartley,et al.  Against the tide of depoliticisation: The politics of research governance , 2017 .

[39]  Stevienna de Saille.  Innovating Innovation Policy: The emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’ , 2015 .

[40]  M. Kearnes,et al.  Tools of the Trade: UK Research Intermediaries and the Politics of Impacts , 2011 .