The Canary in the City: Indicator Groups as Predictors of Urban Change

As cities grow, certain neighborhoods experience a particularly high demand for housing, resulting in escalating rents. Despite far-reaching socioeconomic consequences, it remains difficult to predict when and where urban neighborhoods will face such changes. To tackle this challenge, we adapt the concept of `bioindicators', borrowed from ecology, to the urban context. The objective is to use an `indicator group' of people to assess the quality of a complex environment and its changes over time. Specifically, we analyze 92 million geolocated Twitter records across five US cities, allowing us to derive socio-economic user profiles based on individual movement patterns. As a proof-of-concept, we define users with a `high-income-profile' as an indicator group and show that their visitation patterns are a suitable indicator for expected future rent increases in different neighborhoods. The concept of indicator groups highlights the potential of closely monitoring only a specific subset of the population, rather than the population as a whole. If the indicator group is defined appropriately for the phenomenon of interest, this approach can yield early predictions while simultaneously reducing the amount of data that needs to be collected and analyzed.

[1]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Measuring Urban Social Diversity Using Interconnected Geo-Social Networks , 2016, WWW.

[2]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Making Big Data Small: Strategies to Expand Urban and Geographical Research Using Social Media , 2017 .

[3]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Mobile Landscapes: Using Location Data from Cell Phones for Urban Analysis , 2006 .

[4]  Michael Batty,et al.  Revealing centrality in the spatial structure of cities from human activity patterns , 2017 .

[5]  Seth E. Spielman,et al.  The Past, Present, and Future of Geodemographic Research in the United States and United Kingdom , 2014, The Professional geographer : the journal of the Association of American Geographers.

[6]  Edgar M. Hoover,et al.  ANATOMY OF A METROPOLIS. THE CHANGING DISTRIBUTION OF PEOPLE AND JOBS WITHIN THE NEW YORK METROPOLITAN REGION , 1959 .

[7]  A. E. Smailes,et al.  London: Aspects of Change , 1964 .

[8]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  The scaling of human interactions with city size , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Early Warnings of Regime Shifts: A Whole-Ecosystem Experiment , 2011, Science.

[10]  Elvin K. Wyly,et al.  A Model for Identifying Gentrified Areas with Census Data. , 1996 .

[11]  Paul A. Longley,et al.  Geodemographics as a tool for targeting neighbourhoods in public health campaigns , 2011, J. Geogr. Syst..

[12]  Elizabeth C. Delmelle,et al.  Mapping the DNA of Urban Neighborhoods: Clustering Longitudinal Sequences of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Change , 2016 .

[13]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Social Media and the City: Rethinking Urban Socio-Spatial Inequality Using User-Generated Geographic Information , 2015 .

[14]  Tat-Seng Chua,et al.  Harvesting Multiple Sources for User Profile Learning: a Big Data Study , 2015, ICMR.

[15]  Nikolaos Aletras,et al.  An analysis of the user occupational class through Twitter content , 2015, ACL.

[16]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Early-warning signals for critical transitions , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Sam Ashman,et al.  Combined and uneven development , 2012 .

[18]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  N. Smith Gentrification and Uneven Development , 1982 .

[20]  Elizabeth C. Delmelle,et al.  Differentiating pathways of neighborhood change in 50 U.S. metropolitan areas , 2017 .

[21]  Gabriel Cadamuro,et al.  Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata , 2015, Science.

[22]  Matthew K. Lau,et al.  How do ecologists select and use indicator species to monitor ecological change? Insights from 14 years of publication in Ecological Indicators , 2016 .

[23]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Tweets from Justin Bieber's heart: the dynamics of the location field in user profiles , 2011, CHI.

[24]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Why Have Housing Prices Gone Up? , 2005 .

[25]  Yves Tugault,et al.  London. Aspects of change , 1965 .

[26]  Michael Bounds,et al.  The gentrification reader , 2011 .

[27]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Honest Signals - How They Shape Our World , 2008 .

[28]  R. Atkinson Measuring Gentrification and Displacement in Greater London , 2000 .

[29]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: A mobile phone trace example , 2013 .

[30]  CUSTOMER TARGETING, GEODEMOGRAPHICS AND LIFESTYLE APPROACHES , 2007 .

[31]  K. Schwirian Models of Neighborhood Change , 1983 .

[32]  Sharon Zukin Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change , 1982 .

[33]  Daniel Melser,et al.  Hedonic Imputation and the Price Index Problem: An Application to Housing , 2008 .