The central difference scheme (CDS) is a second order accurate scheme which is free of numerical diffusion (in the second order sense) and is simple to implement: However, for grid Peclet numbers larger than 2, the CDS leads to over- and undershoots and is unstable. The present paper describes a method, called CONDIF, which retains the essential nature of the CDS but eliminates the over- and under-shoots. It leads to unconditionally positive coefficients and, in the limit, approaches the CDS for all values of grid Peclet numbers. The CONDIF modifies the CDS by introducing a controlled amount of numerical diffusion based on the local gradients. In the worst case the scheme yields results similar to those of the hybrid scheme. This paper reports the results obtained from CONDIF for a number of test problems which have been widely used for comparative study of numerical schemes in the published literature. For most of these problems, the CONDIF results are significantly more accurate than the hybrid scheme at high Peclet numbers. In particular, the CONDIF scheme depicts much lower level of numerical diffusion than the hybrid scheme even when the Peclet number is very high and the flow is at large angles to the grid.
[1]
Murli M. Gupta,et al.
A single cell high order scheme for the convection‐diffusion equation with variable coefficients
,
1984
.
[2]
G. D. Raithby,et al.
Skew upstream differencing schemes for problems involving fluid flow
,
1976
.
[3]
A. K. Runchal,et al.
Convergence and accuracy of three finite difference schemes for a two‐dimensional conduction and convection problem
,
1972
.
[4]
B. Armaly,et al.
Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow
,
1983,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[5]
B. R. Baliga,et al.
A NEW FINITE-ELEMENT FORMULATION FOR CONVECTION-DIFFUSION PROBLEMS
,
1980
.
[6]
D. Spalding.
A novel finite difference formulation for differential expressions involving both first and second derivatives
,
1972
.