Control of cricket stridulation by a command neuron: efficacy depends on the behavioral state.

Crickets use different song patterns for acoustic communication. The stridulatory pattern-generating networks are housed within the thoracic ganglia but are controlled by the brain. This descending control of stridulation was identified by intracellular recordings and stainings of brain neurons. Its impact on the generation of calling song was analyzed both in resting and stridulating crickets and during cercal wind stimulation, which impaired the stridulatory movements and caused transient silencing reactions. A descending interneuron in the brain serves as a command neuron for calling-song stridulation. The neuron has a dorsal soma position, anterior dendritic processes, and an axon that descends in the contralateral connective. The neuron is present in each side of the CNS. It is not activated in resting crickets. Intracellular depolarization of the interneuron so that its spike frequency is increased to 60-80 spikes/s reliably elicits calling-song stridulation. The spike frequency is modulated slightly in the chirp cycle with the maximum activity in phase with each chirp. There is a high positive correlation between the chirp repetition rate and the interneuron's spike frequency. Only a very weak correlation, however, exists between the syllable repetition rate and the interneuron activity. The effectiveness of the command neuron depends on the activity state of the cricket. In resting crickets, experimentally evoked short bursts of action potentials elicit only incomplete calling-song chirps. In crickets that previously had stridulated during the experiment, short elicitation of interneuron activity can trigger sustained calling songs during which the interneuron exhibits a spike frequency of approximately 30 spikes/s. During sustained calling songs, the command neuron activity is necessary to maintain the stridulatory behavior. Inhibition of the interneuron stops stridulation. A transient increase in the spike frequency of the interneuron speeds up the chirp rate and thereby resets the timing of the chirp pattern generator. The interneuron also is excited by cercal wind stimulation. Cercal wind stimulation can impair the pattern of chirp and syllable generation, but these changes are not reflected in the discharge pattern of the command neuron. During wind-evoked silencing reactions, the activity of the calling-song command neuron remains unchanged, but under these conditions, its activity is no longer sufficient to maintain stridulation. Therefore stridulation can be suppressed by cercal inputs from the terminal ganglia without directly inhibiting the descending command activity.

[1]  W N Frost,et al.  Single neuron control over a complex motor program. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  K. Schildberger,et al.  Brain Neurones Involved in the Control of Walking in the Cricket Gryllus Bimaculatus , 1992 .

[3]  R. Hoy,et al.  Initiation of behavior by single neurons: the role of behavioral context. , 1984, Science.

[4]  J. Kien The initiation and maintenance of walking in the locust: an alternative to the command concept , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  K. R. Weiss,et al.  The command neuron concept , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  F B Krasne,et al.  Response-dedicated trigger neurons as control points for behavioral actions: selective inhibition of lateral giant command neurons during feeding in crayfish , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  S. Kater,et al.  Identified higher-order neurons controlling the feeding motor program of helisoma , 1977, Neuroscience.

[8]  B. Jahan-Parwar,et al.  Command neurons for locomotion in Aplysia. , 1983, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[9]  J. -. Wu,et al.  Neuronal activity during different behaviors in Aplysia: a distributed organization? , 1994, Science.

[10]  F. Huber The role of the central nervous system in Orthoptera during coordination and control of stridulation , 1964 .

[11]  W. J. Heitler,et al.  Fifty years of a command neuron: the neurobiology of escape behavior in the crayfish , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  M. Kovac,et al.  Control of feeding motor output by paracerebral neurons in brain of Pleurobranchaea californica. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  P. S. Dickinson,et al.  Interactions among neural networks for behavior , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  J. C. Weeks Neuronal basis of leech swimming: separation of swim initiation, pattern generation, and intersegmental coordination by selective lesions. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  B. Hedwig,et al.  NEUROLAB, a comprehensive program for the analysis of neurophysiological and behavioural data , 1992, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  R. Murphey,et al.  The morphology of cricket giant interneurons. , 1974, Journal of neurobiology.

[17]  J Palka,et al.  The cerci and abdominal giant fibres of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. I. Anatomy and physiology of normal adults , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[18]  Ann Fielden Transmission Through the Last Abdominal Ganglion of the Dragonfly Nymph, Anax Imperator , 1960 .

[19]  P. Stein Motor systems, with specific reference to the control of locomotion. , 1978, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  K G Pearson,et al.  Flight-initiating interneurons in the locust. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  K. R. Weiss,et al.  An Identified Interneuron Contributes to Aspects of Six Different Behaviors in Aplysia , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  E. Staudacher Distribution and morphology of descending brain neurons in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus , 1998, Cell and Tissue Research.

[23]  Brian K. Shaw,et al.  The Neuronal Basis of the Behavioral Choice between Swimming and Shortening in the Leech: Control Is Not Selectively Exercised at Higher Circuit Levels , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M Knepper,et al.  NEUROLAB, a PC-program for the processing of neurobiological data. , 1997, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[25]  M. P. Nusbaum,et al.  Motor Pattern Selection via Inhibition of Parallel Pathways , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  P A Getting,et al.  Emerging principles governing the operation of neural networks. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  W. Davis,et al.  Command interneurons controlling swimmeret movements in the lobster. I. Types of effects on motoneurons. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Jing,et al.  Neuronal elements that mediate escape swimming and suppress feeding behavior in the predatory sea slug Pleurobranchaea. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  B. Hedwig,et al.  Identified descending brain neurons control different stridulatory motor patterns in an acridid grasshopper , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  K. Pearson Common principles of motor control in vertebrates and invertebrates. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  W. Kristan,et al.  Initiation, Maintenance and Modulation of Swimming in the Medicinal Leech by the Activity of a Single Neurone , 1978 .

[32]  M. Hörner,et al.  Wind-Evoked Escape Running of the cricket Gryllus Bimaculatus: I. Behavioural Analysis , 1992 .

[33]  H. Chiel,et al.  Neural architectures for adaptive behavior , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  Visual interneurones of the neck connectives in Gryllus bimaculatus , 1985 .

[35]  J. Ramirez,et al.  Reconfiguration of the respiratory network at the onset of locust flight. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  C. Mccrohan Initiation of Feeding Motor Output by an Identified Interneurone in the Snail Lymnaea Stagnalis , 1984 .

[37]  C. Wiersma,et al.  INTERNEURONS COMMANDING SWIMMERET MOVEMENTS IN THE CRAYFISH, PROCAMBARUS CLARKI (GIRARD). , 1964, Comparative biochemistry and physiology.

[38]  W. O. Friesen,et al.  Neuronal control of leech swimming. , 1995, Journal of neurobiology.

[39]  B. Hedwig,et al.  A cephalothoracic command system controls stridulation in the acridid grasshopper Omocestus viridulus L. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  J. Palka,et al.  The cerci and abdominal giant fibres of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. II. Regeneration and effects of chronic deprivation , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[41]  James L. Larimer,et al.  The command hypothesis: a new view using an old example , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  W. Kristan,et al.  Population coding and behavioral choice , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  Kohstall-Schnell,et al.  ACTIVITY OF GIANT INTERNEURONES AND OTHER WIND-SENSITIVE ELEMENTS OF THE TERMINAL GANGLION IN THE WALKING CRICKET , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[44]  R. Satterlie,et al.  Whole body withdrawal circuit and its involvement in the behavioral hierarchy of the mollusk Clione limacina. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  K G Pearson,et al.  Generation of motor patterns for walking and flight in motoneurons supplying bifunctional muscles in the locust. , 1988, Journal of neurobiology.

[46]  E. Staudacher,et al.  Gating of sensory responses of descending brain neurones during walking in crickets , 1998 .

[47]  M. Kovac,et al.  Neural mechanism underlying behavioral choice in Pleurobranchaea. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  M. Kovac,et al.  Command neurons in Pleurobranchaea receive synaptic feedback from the motor network they excite. , 1978, Science.