Faithful modeling of transient expression and its application to elucidating negative feedback regulation

Modeling and analysis of genetic regulatory networks is essential both for better understanding their dynamic behavior and for elucidating and refining open issues. We hereby present a discrete computational model that effectively describes the transient and sequential expression of a network of genes in a representative developmental pathway. Our model system is a transcriptional cascade that includes positive and negative feedback loops directing the initiation and progression through meiosis in budding yeast. The computational model allows qualitative analysis of the transcription of early meiosis-specific genes, specifically, Ime2 and their master activator, Ime1. The simulations demonstrate a robust transcriptional behavior with respect to the initial levels of Ime1 and Ime2. The computational results were verified experimentally by deleting various genes and by changing initial conditions. The model has a strong predictive aspect, and it provides insights into how to distinguish among and reason about alternative hypotheses concerning the mode by which negative regulation through Ime1 and Ime2 is accomplished. Some predictions were validated experimentally, for instance, showing that the decline in the transcription of IME1 depends on Rpd3, which is recruited by Ime1 to its promoter. Finally, this general model promotes the analysis of systems that are devoid of consistent quantitative data, as is often the case, and it can be easily adapted to other developmental pathways.

[1]  R. Akada,et al.  Initiation of meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a novel protein kinase homologue , 1990, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[2]  A. Yoshimura,et al.  SOCS1 Deficiency Causes a Lymphocyte-Dependent Perinatal Lethality , 1999, Cell.

[3]  Galit Shenhar,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast. , 2003, International review of cytology.

[4]  Amir Sherman,et al.  Multiple and Distinct Activation and Repression Sequences Mediate the Regulated Transcription of IME1, a Transcriptional Activator of Meiosis-Specific Genes inSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[5]  K. Struhl,et al.  Repression by Ume6 Involves Recruitment of a Complex Containing Sin3 Corepressor and Rpd3 Histone Deacetylase to Target Promoters , 1997, Cell.

[6]  Michael P Washburn,et al.  Stable incorporation of sequence specific repressors Ash1 and Ume6 into the Rpd3L complex. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[7]  E. Davidson,et al.  Modeling transcriptional regulatory networks. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[8]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Control of landmark events in meiosis by the CDK Cdc28 and the meiosis-specific kinase Ime2. , 2003, Genes & development.

[9]  Y. Kassir,et al.  Ime2, a Meiosis-Specific Kinase in Yeast, Is Required for Destabilization of Its Transcriptional Activator, Ime1 , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[10]  M. Freeman Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development , 2000, Nature.

[11]  A. Pugsley,et al.  Five additional genes in thepulC-O operon of the gram-negative bacteriumKlebslella oxytoca UNF5023 which are required for pullulanase secretion , 1990, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[12]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  Y. Kassir,et al.  The In Vivo Activity of Ime1, the Key Transcriptional Activator of Meiosis-Specific Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Is Inhibited by the Cyclic AMP/Protein Kinase A Signal Pathway through the Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3-β Homolog Rim11 , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[14]  N. Allen,et al.  Neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in chemically defined medium , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[15]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Y. Kassir,et al.  IME1, a positive regulator gene of meiosis in S. cerevisiae , 1988, Cell.

[17]  Galit Shenhar,et al.  A Positive Regulator of Mitosis, Sok2, Functions as a Negative Regulator of Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  Y. Kassir,et al.  Post-transcriptional regulation of IME1 determines initiation of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevislae , 1993, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[19]  G. Rubin,et al.  Ommatidia in the developing Drosophila eye require and can respond to sevenless for only a restricted period , 1989, Cell.

[20]  Identification of the Sin3-Binding Site in Ume6 Defines a Two-Step Process for Conversion of Ume6 from a Transcriptional Repressor to an Activator in Yeast , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[21]  Y. Kassir,et al.  Induction of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on conversion of the transcriptional represssor Ume6 to a positive regulator by its regulated association with the transcriptional activator Ime1 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[22]  B. Palsson,et al.  Toward Metabolic Phenomics: Analysis of Genomic Data Using Flux Balances , 1999, Biotechnology progress.

[23]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[24]  Y. Kassir,et al.  Monitoring meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[25]  H. E. Smith,et al.  Positive control of sporulation-specific genes by the IME1 and IME2 products in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[26]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Stimulation of yeast meiotic gene expression by the glucose-repressible protein kinase Rim15p , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[27]  Adrien Richard,et al.  Application of formal methods to biological regulatory networks: extending Thomas' asynchronous logical approach with temporal logic. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  G. Lucchini,et al.  Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the yeast DNA polymerase alpha-primase B subunit , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  Y. Kassir,et al.  Glucose and Nitrogen Regulate the Switch from Histone Deacetylation to Acetylation for Expression of Early Meiosis-Specific Genes in Budding Yeast , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[30]  Y. Kassir,et al.  Positive and negative feedback loops affect the transcription of IME1, a positive regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1995, Developmental genetics.

[31]  George M Church,et al.  The Isw2 Chromatin Remodeling Complex Represses Early Meiotic Genes upon Recruitment by Ume6p , 2000, Cell.

[32]  S. Schuster,et al.  Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation , 2002, Nature.

[33]  Enrique Herrero,et al.  G1 cyclins block the Ime1 pathway to make mitosis and meiosis incompatible in budding yeast , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[34]  Eric H Davidson,et al.  Modeling DNA sequence-based cis-regulatory gene networks. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[35]  S. Chu,et al.  Gametogenesis in yeast is regulated by a transcriptional cascade dependent on Ndt80. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[36]  H. E. Smith,et al.  A transcriptional cascade governs entry into meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[37]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Gene Networks , 2000, Neuron.