Can GPS-Derived Surface Loading Bridge a GRACE Mission Gap?

We investigated two ‘gap-filler’ methods based on GPS-derived low-degree surface loading variations (GPS-I and GPS-C) and a more simple method (REF-S) which extends a seasonal harmonic variation into the expected Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission gap. We simulated two mission gaps in a reference solution (REF), which is derived from a joint inversion of GRACE (RL05) data, GPS-derived surface loading and simulated ocean bottom pressure. The GPS-I and GPS-C methods both have a new type of constraint applied to mitigate the lack of GPS station network coverage over the ocean. To obtain the GPS-C solution, the GPS-I method is adjusted such that it fits the reference solution better in a 1.5 year overlapping period outside of the gap. As can be expected, the GPS-I and GPS-C solutions contain larger errors compared to the reference solution, which is heavily constrained by GRACE. Within the simulated gaps, the GPS-C solution generally fits the reference solution better compared to the GPS-I method, both in terms of spherical harmonic loading coefficients and in terms of selected basin-averaged hydrological mass variations. Depending on the basin, the RMS-error of the water storage variations (scaled for leakage effects) ranges between 1.6 cm (Yukon) and 15.3 cm (Orinoco). In terms of noise level, the seasonal gap-filler method (REF-S) even outperforms the GPS-I and GPS-C methods, which are still affected by spatial aliasing problems. However, it must be noted that the REF-S method cannot be used beyond the study of simple harmonic seasonal variations.

[1]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[2]  C. Jekeli Alternative methods to smooth the Earth's gravity field , 1981 .

[3]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[4]  G. Blewitt,et al.  A New Global Mode of Earth Deformation: Seasonal Cycle Detected , 2001, Science.

[5]  Shailen D. Desai,et al.  Observing the pole tide with satellite altimetry , 2002 .

[6]  J. Kusche,et al.  Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components , 2002 .

[7]  P. Döll,et al.  A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation , 2003 .

[8]  G. Blewitt Self‐consistency in reference frames, geocenter definition, and surface loading of the solid Earth , 2003 .

[9]  Peter J. Clarke,et al.  Inversion of Earth's changing shape to weigh sea level in static equilibrium with surface mass redistribution , 2003 .

[10]  J. Kusche,et al.  A Monte-Carlo technique for weight estimation in satellite geodesy , 2003 .

[11]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[12]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Impact of higher‐order ionospheric terms on GPS estimates , 2005 .

[13]  Jürgen Kusche,et al.  Surface mass redistribution inversion from global GPS deformation and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) gravity data , 2005 .

[14]  J. Wahr,et al.  Acceleration of Greenland ice mass loss in spring 2004 , 2006, Nature.

[15]  Mark A. Wieczorek,et al.  Spatiospectral Concentration on a Sphere , 2004, SIAM Rev..

[16]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Reprocessing of a global GPS network , 2006 .

[17]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Seasonal and interannual global surface mass variations from multisatellite geodetic data , 2006 .

[18]  J. Kusche,et al.  Hydrological Signals Observed by the GRACE Satellites , 2008 .

[19]  M. Rodell,et al.  Assimilation of GRACE Terrestrial Water Storage Data into a Land Surface Model: Results for the Mississippi River Basin , 2008 .

[20]  Oliver Baur,et al.  GRACE‐derived ice‐mass variations over Greenland by accounting for leakage effects , 2009 .

[21]  F. A. Dahleo The Passive Influence of the Oceans upon the Rotation of the Earth , 2009 .

[22]  J. Schröter,et al.  Ocean circulation and sea ice distribution in a finite element global sea ice–ocean model , 2009 .

[23]  J. Kusche,et al.  Changes in total ocean mass derived from GRACE, GPS, and ocean modeling with weekly resolution , 2009 .

[24]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of global present-day water transport and glacial isostatic adjustment , 2010 .

[25]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  Strategies to mitigate aliasing of loading signals while estimating GPS frame parameters , 2011, Journal of Geodesy.

[26]  R. Nerem,et al.  Experiments with EOF-based Gravity Field Reconstructions Using SLR and GRACE Data , 2011 .

[27]  Jens Schröter,et al.  Measuring ocean mass variability from satellite gravimetry , 2011 .

[28]  Eric Rignot,et al.  Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise , 2011 .

[29]  D. Stammer,et al.  Impact of assimilating bottom pressure anomalies from GRACE on ocean circulation estimates , 2012 .

[30]  J. Kusche,et al.  Resolving sea level contributions by identifying fingerprints in time-variable gravity and altimetry , 2012 .

[31]  J. Ray,et al.  Geocenter motion and its geodetic and geophysical implications , 2012 .

[32]  Jens Schröter,et al.  Global surface mass from a new combination of GRACE, modelled OBP and reprocessed GPS data , 2012 .

[33]  C. Gerlach,et al.  Time‐variable gravity field from satellite constellations using the energy integral , 2012 .

[34]  J. Kusche,et al.  Water mass variation in the Mediterranean and Black Seas , 2012 .

[35]  Karsten Danzmann,et al.  Intersatellite laser ranging instrument for the GRACE follow-on mission , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[36]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Status of the GRACE Follow-On Mission , 2013 .

[37]  Grzegorz Michalak,et al.  GFZ GRACE Level-2 Processing Standards Document for Level-2 Product Release 0005 : revised edition, January 2013 , 2013 .

[38]  J. Kusche,et al.  Calibration/Data Assimilation Approach for Integrating GRACE Data into the WaterGAP Global Hydrology Model (WGHM) Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter: First Results , 2013, Surveys in Geophysics.