Modularity in the motion system: independent oculomotor and perceptual processing of brief moving stimuli.

In addition to motion perception per se, we utilize motion information for a wide range of brain functions. These varied functions place different demands on the visual system, and therefore a stimulus that provides useful information for one function may be inadequate for another. For example, the direction of motion of large high-contrast stimuli is difficult to discriminate perceptually, but other studies have shown that such stimuli are highly effective at eliciting directional oculomotor responses such as the ocular following response (OFR). Here, we investigated the degree of independence between perceptual and oculomotor processing by determining whether perceptually suppressed moving stimuli can nonetheless evoke reliable eye movements. We measured reflexively evoked tracking eye movements while observers discriminated the motion direction of large high-contrast stimuli. To quantify the discrimination ability of the oculomotor system, we used signal detection theory to generate associated oculometric functions. The results showed that oculomotor sensitivity to motion direction is not predicted by perceptual sensitivity to the same stimuli. In fact, in several cases oculomotor responses were more reliable than perceptual responses. Moreover, a trial-by-trial analysis indicated that, for stimuli tested in this study, oculomotor processing was statistically independent from perceptual processing. Evidently, perceptual and oculomotor responses reflect the activity of independent dissociable mechanisms despite operating on the same input. While results of this kind have traditionally been interpreted in the framework of perception versus action, we propose that these differences reflect a more general principle of modularity.

[1]  Guillaume S. Masson,et al.  The behavioral receptive field underlying motion integration for primate tracking eye movements , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Improved Motion Perception and Impaired Spatial Suppression following Disruption of Cortical Area MT/V5 , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Reversed short-latency ocular following , 2002, Vision Research.

[4]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Initial ocular following in humans: A response to first-order motion energy , 2005, Vision Research.

[5]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Enhanced Visual Motion Perception in Major Depressive Disorder , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  E. J. Morris,et al.  Visual motion processing and sensory-motor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Brian H Scott,et al.  A comparison of pursuit eye movement and perceptual performance in speed discrimination. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[8]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Estimating Target Speed from the Population Response in Visual Area MT , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Weakened Center-Surround Interactions in Visual Motion Processing in Schizophrenia , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Béatrice de Gelder,et al.  Collicular Vision Guides Nonconscious Behavior , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  F. A. Miles,et al.  The initial ocular following responses elicited by apparent-motion stimuli: Reversal by inter-stimulus intervals , 2006, Vision Research.

[12]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  Duje Tadin,et al.  A Substantial and Unexpected Enhancement of Motion Perception in Autism , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Maninder K. Kahlon,et al.  Visual Motion Analysis for Pursuit Eye Movements in Area MT of Macaque Monkeys , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  O. Braddick Segmentation versus integration in visual motion processing , 1993, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  R. Andersen,et al.  Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons , 1998, Nature.

[18]  Stephen G. Lisberger,et al.  Directional Anisotropies Reveal a Functional Segregation of Visual Motion Processing for Perception and Action , 2003, Neuron.

[19]  Allison M McKendrick,et al.  Center-surround visual motion processing in migraine. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Linda Jeffery,et al.  Race-specific norms for coding face identity and a functional role for norms. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[21]  I. Vanzetta,et al.  Behavioral receptive field for ocular following in humans: dynamics of spatial summation and center-surround interactions. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness , 2006 .

[23]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area , 1992, Nature.

[24]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Perceptual Relearning of Complex Visual Motion after V1 Damage in Humans , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  Miriam Spering,et al.  Tracking Without Perceiving , 2011, Psychology Science.

[29]  R. Krauzlis,et al.  Shared motion signals for human perceptual decisions and oculomotor actions. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[30]  Miriam Spering,et al.  Similar Effects of Feature-Based Attention on Motion Perception and Pursuit Eye Movements at Different Levels of Awareness , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity , 1987, Vision Research.

[32]  W. Newsome,et al.  Deficits in visual motion processing following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  Jan Churan,et al.  Interaction of spatial and temporal factors in psychophysical estimates of surround suppression. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[34]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): Evidence for nonlinearities due to local and global inhibitory interactions , 2008, Vision Research.

[35]  Duje Tadin,et al.  A Strong Interactive Link between Sensory Discriminations and Intelligence , 2013, Current Biology.

[36]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Perceptual and neural consequences of rapid motion adaptation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  S. Yamane,et al.  Neural activity in cortical area MST of alert monkey during ocular following responses. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  R. Born,et al.  Segregation of Object and Background Motion in Visual Area MT Effects of Microstimulation on Eye Movements , 2000, Neuron.

[39]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[40]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[41]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  When your eyes see more than you do , 2010, Current Biology.

[42]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing , 2003, Nature.

[43]  James M. G. Tsui,et al.  Brief motion stimuli preferentially activate surround-suppressed neurons in macaque visual area MT , 2008, Current Biology.

[44]  Jeffrey B. Nyquist,et al.  Spatial and temporal limits of motion perception across variations in speed, eccentricity, and low vision. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[45]  F A Miles,et al.  Short latency ocular-following responses in man , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[46]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[47]  P. Sterzer,et al.  A direct oculomotor correlate of unconscious visual processing , 2012, Current Biology.

[48]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Increasing stimulus size impairs first- but not second-order motion perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[49]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  More is not always better: adaptive gain control explains dissociation between perception and action , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Large-Field Visual Motion Directly Induces an Involuntary Rapid Manual Following Response , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Optimal size for perceiving motion decreases with contrast , 2005, Vision Research.

[52]  Christopher Patrick Taylor,et al.  Aging Reduces Center-Surround Antagonism in Visual Motion Processing , 2005, Neuron.

[53]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  The Hand Sees Visual Periphery Better Than the Eye: Motor-Dependent Visual Motion Analyses , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Linking Psychophysics and Physiology of Center-Surround Interactions in Visual Motion Processing , 2005 .

[55]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.