Power efficient organization of wireless sensor networks

Wireless sensor networks have emerged recently as an effective way of monitoring remote or inhospitable physical environments. One of the major challenges in devising such networks lies in the constrained energy and computational resources available to sensor nodes. These constraints must be taken into account at all levels of the system hierarchy. The deployment of sensor nodes is the first step in establishing a sensor network. Since sensor networks contain a large number of sensor nodes, the nodes must be deployed in clusters, where the location of each particular node cannot be fully guaranteed a priori. Therefore, the number of nodes that must be deployed in order to completely cover the whole monitored area is often higher than if a deterministic procedure were used. In networks with stochastically placed nodes, activating only the necessary number of sensor nodes at any particular moment can save energy. We introduce a heuristic that selects mutually exclusive sets of sensor nodes, where the members of each of those sets together completely cover the monitored area. The intervals of activity are the same for all sets, and only one of the sets is active at any time. The experimental results demonstrate that by using only a subset of sensor nodes at each moment, we achieve a significant energy savings while fully preserving coverage.

[1]  David L. Tennenhouse,et al.  Proactive computing , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[2]  G. Asada,et al.  Wireless integrated network sensors: Low power systems on a chip , 1998, Proceedings of the 24th European Solid-State Circuits Conference.

[3]  Luca Benini,et al.  A discrete-time battery model for high-level power estimation , 2000, DATE '00.

[4]  Wendi Heinzelman,et al.  Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  P. C. Schuur,et al.  Improved Coverings of a Square with Six and Eight Equal Circles , 1996, Electron. J. Comb..

[6]  Sujata Banerjee,et al.  Optimization of indoor wireless communication network layouts , 2002 .

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Embedding the Internet: introduction , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[8]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Next Century Challenges: Mobile Networking for Smart Dust , 1999, MobiCom 1999.

[9]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[10]  Massoud Pedram,et al.  Low power design methodologies , 1996 .

[11]  Satish Kumar,et al.  Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[12]  Robert Jan. Williams,et al.  The Geometrical Foundation of Natural Structure: A Source Book of Design , 1979 .

[13]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[14]  K. Nurmela,et al.  COVERING A SQUARE WITH UP TO 30 EQUAL CIRCLES , 2000 .

[15]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Wireless integrated network sensors , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[16]  Anthony Ephremides,et al.  Spectral efficiency and optimal base placement for indoor wireless networks , 1996, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..