International Publication Trends of Retinopathy of Prematurity Literature Over 40 Years

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis to evaluate the publication trends of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) literature over time, focusing on geographic and economic origins. Methods: A search for indexed English abstracts was performed in PubMed using search terms “retinopathy of prematurity” or “retrolental fibroplasia” from 1976 to 2015 and divided into 4 decades. Original research articles involving humans were included. Countries were grouped into high-, middle-, and low-income groups using World Bank criteria, and impact factors (IFs) were gathered from 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports. Results: A total of 5425 publications were identified, of which 2045 met the inclusion criteria. The ratios of publications per decade increased over time: 1976 to 1985 (5.4%), 1986 to 1995 (15.8%), 1996 to 2005 (25%), 2006 to 2015 (53.7%; Pearson r = .93, 95% confidence interval: 0.87-0.96). The rates of publications by income group were high—(82.2%), middle—(17.7%), and low—(0.1%). Respective mean (standard deviation) IFs by income group were 2.79 (4.87), 1.23 (1.17), and 0.42 (0.45). Top producing countries were the United States (37%), the United Kingdom (6.7%), India (4.6%), Japan (3.9%), and Turkey (3.5%). There was a significant difference between the time distribution of publications between high- and middle-income groups, where the latter has produced increasing publications in recent years (P < .001), but in journals with lower IFs overall (P < .001). Conclusions: Publications regarding ROP are increasing in number. Investigators from middle-income countries are increasingly contributing to the ROP literature but, overall, may not be recognized yet in journals with high IFs.

[1]  Christophe Boudry,et al.  Trends and topics in eye disease research in PubMed from 2010 to 2014 , 2016, PeerJ.

[2]  P. Royle,et al.  Macular disease research in the United Kingdom 2011–2014: a bibliometric analysis of outputs, performance and coverage , 2015, BMC Research Notes.

[3]  O. Dammann,et al.  Retinopathy of prematurity , 2013, The Lancet.

[4]  Xiulan Zhang,et al.  Scientific publications in ophthalmic journals from China and other top-ranking countries: a 12-year review of the literature , 2013, BMC Ophthalmology.

[5]  G. Gole,et al.  Retinopathy of prematurity-incidence today. , 2013, Clinics in perinatology.

[6]  D. Rohra Representation of less-developed countries in Pharmacology journals: an online survey of corresponding authors , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[7]  C. Gilbert Retinopathy of prematurity: a global perspective of the epidemics, population of babies at risk and implications for control. , 2008, Early human development.

[8]  A. Malviya,et al.  Who publishes in leading general surgical journals? The divide between the developed and developing worlds. , 2006, Asian journal of surgery.

[9]  N. Ohba [Bibliometric analysis of the current international ophthalmic publications]. , 2005, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[10]  S. Fraser,et al.  The contribution to ophthalmic literature from different regions of the world , 2004, International Ophthalmology.

[11]  Penny Jennett,et al.  Telemedicine approach to screening for severe retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot study. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[12]  Allen Foster,et al.  Retinopathy of prematurity in middle-income countries , 1997, The Lancet.

[13]  Michael C. Ryan,et al.  The Global Education Network for Retinopathy of Prematurity (Gen-Rop): Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of A Novel Tele-Education System (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). , 2015, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.