Flexible alarming mechanism of a general GDS deployment for explosive accidents caused by gas leakage

Abstract Gas detection system (GDS) is critical for identifying and suppressing the flammable or hazardous gas leaked by incidents. The spread of a flammable gas cloud is susceptible to external factors and highly uncertain, but the GDSs deployed today often raise alarms based on certainty. It means that the threshold value set in a GDS for triggering alarms is a constant. Such an approach sometimes cannot accurately determine the leakage location, and so it may result in a great delay of gas detection. To reduce the risk of gas leakage, this paper proposes a flexible triggering mechanism for GDSs, where an alarm is raised or not depending on the number of sensors whose reading are reaching or closing to the preset threshold. An equivalent gas cloud (EGC) model is introduced here to provide design inputs for such a flexible triggering GDS. The volume and location distribution of an EGC are estimated with the Gaussian dispersion model, based on the changes of wind speed and direction. A case study in a terminal station of LNG is conducted, to illustrate the effectiveness of the new approach. The findings show that the flexible triggering mechanism is able to make alarms of a GDS more accurate, and meanwhile avoiding unnecessary measures, which can effectively optimize alarming thresholds.

[1]  Bing Wang,et al.  The real-time estimation of hazardous gas dispersion by the integration of gas detectors, neural network and gas dispersion models. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  Francesca Funiciello,et al.  Role of lateral mantle flow in the evolution of subduction systems: insights from laboratory experiments , 2004 .

[3]  Wende Tian,et al.  Alarm clustering analysis and ACO based multi-variable alarms thresholds optimization in chemical processes , 2018 .

[4]  S. Connolly,et al.  Sensitivity Studies of Offshore Gas Detector Networks Based on Experimental Simulations of High Pressure Gas Releases , 2005 .

[5]  Francisco Toja-Silva,et al.  On the urban geometry generalization for CFD simulation of gas dispersion from chimneys: Comparison with Gaussian plume model , 2018, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[6]  Charles de Izarra,et al.  Quantitative consequence analysis using Sedov-Taylor blast wave model. Part I: Model description and validation , 2018 .

[7]  Sávio Souza Venâncio Vianna,et al.  An alternative CFD tool for gas dispersion modelling of heavy gas , 2016 .

[8]  Hui Shao,et al.  Risk Quantitative Calculation and ALOHA Simulation on the Leakage Accident of Natural Gas Power Plant , 2012 .

[9]  Prankul Middha,et al.  Equivalent cloud methods used for explosion risk and consequence studies , 2013 .

[10]  Sirish L. Shah,et al.  Design of visualization plots of industrial alarm and event data for enhanced alarm management , 2018 .

[11]  Wang Yuxiu,et al.  Study on layout optimization strategy of gas detectors using genetic algorithm , 2016 .

[12]  S. Connolly,et al.  Evaluation of Flammable Gas Detector Networks Based on Experimental Simulations of Offshore, High Pressure Gas Releases , 2002 .

[13]  Md. Tanjin Amin,et al.  A bibliometric review of process safety and risk analysis , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[14]  A. M. Birk.  Shock waves and condensation clouds from industrial BLEVEs and VCEs , 2017 .

[15]  Tov Elperin,et al.  Effect of raindrop size distribution on scavenging of aerosol particles from Gaussian air pollution plumes and puffs in turbulent atmosphere , 2016 .

[16]  D. Mazzeo,et al.  Estimation of wind speed probability density function using a mixture of two truncated normal distributions , 2018 .

[17]  Majeed Abimbola,et al.  A new method to study the performance of safety alarm system in process operations , 2018, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[18]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Modelling an integrated impact of fire, explosion and combustion products during transitional events caused by an accidental release of LNG , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[19]  Melih Soner Çeliktaş,et al.  Statistical analysis of wind speed using two-parameter Weibull distribution in Alaçatı region , 2016 .

[20]  Desheng Li,et al.  Numerical analysis of the diffusion effects of combustible gas leak on the leak location , 2017 .

[21]  Marcia S. Araujo,et al.  Designing gas detection systems for offshore installations using CFD models , 1999 .

[22]  Ming Yang,et al.  Operational risk assessment: A case of the Bhopal disaster , 2015 .

[23]  Faisal Khan,et al.  A risk-based approach to design warning system for processing facilities , 2011 .

[24]  Naser Badri,et al.  A risk-based methodology for optimum placement of flammable gas detectors within open process plants , 2017 .

[25]  Jia Wang,et al.  A data similarity based analysis to consequential alarms of industrial processes , 2015 .

[26]  Jonathan D. W. Kahl,et al.  Atmospheric stability characterization using the Pasquill method: A critical evaluation , 2018, Atmospheric Environment.

[27]  Weiqiu Huang,et al.  Numerical simulation and applications of equivalent film thickness in oil evaporation loss evaluation of internal floating-roof tank , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[28]  Stephen Defriend,et al.  A risk-based approach to flammable gas detector spacing. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[29]  Josep Arnaldos,et al.  Optimizing the design of storage facilities through the application of ISD and QRA , 2014 .

[30]  Han Guoqing,et al.  A New Model to Evaluate Two Leak Points in a Gas Pipeline , 2016 .