How to Spread Kindness: Effects of Rewarding Elements Within a Persuasive Application to Foster Prosocial Behavior

For investigating whether rewarding elements within a persuasive web-application for increasing prosocial behavior are effective, we conducted an experimental field study with a self-developed web-app (N = 42). Two different versions of the persuasive web-app (high/low persuasive) to foster good deeds were implemented and examined during a three-week period. In both versions, the evaluation of the user-interface correlated positively with the execution of the target behavior, i.e. performing good deeds. Also, the availability of a user profile and a ranking was positively associated with performing prosocial behavior. However, there was neither a significant difference regarding the intensity of app usage nor concerning the number of performed good deeds between experimental groups (high/low persuasive). Therefore, the availability of more persuasive features does not necessarily entail more persuasion. In conclusion, we derive design suggestions for developing persuasive mobile applications which provide benefits for (pro-)social life through encouraging people to perform good deeds.

[1]  Magnus Bång,et al.  The PowerHhouse: A Persuasive Computer Game Designed to Raise Awareness of Domestic Energy Consumption , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[2]  Rosta Farzan,et al.  Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise , 2008, CHI.

[3]  Chris Schmandt,et al.  Spotz: A Location-Based Approach to Self-awareness , 2013, PERSUASIVE.

[4]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  Understanding of website usability: Specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Andreas Spahn,et al.  And Lead Us (Not) into Persuasion…? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[6]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[7]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Do points, levels and leaderboards harm intrinsic motivation?: an empirical analysis of common gamification elements , 2013, Gamification.

[8]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[9]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface , 1988, CHI '88.

[10]  Thomas Grechenig,et al.  "show-me": water consumption at a glance to promote water conservation in the shower , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[11]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  Wattsup?: motivating reductions in domestic energy consumption using social networks , 2010, NordiCHI.

[12]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[13]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[14]  Marc Busch,et al.  Personalized Persuasive Technology - Development and Validation of Scales for Measuring Persuadability , 2013, PERSUASIVE.

[15]  Rui Li,et al.  Intrinsic spontaneous brain activity predicts individual variability in associative memory in older adults , 2018, PsyCh journal.

[16]  Gerd Bohner,et al.  Attitudes and attitude change. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  What makes Web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study , 2001, CHI.

[18]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Motivating, influencing, and persuading users , 2002 .

[19]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  Eudaimonic Design, or: Six Invitations to Rethink Gamification , 2014 .

[20]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  A behavior model for persuasive design , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[21]  Julie A. Kientz,et al.  Personality and Persuasive Technology: An Exploratory Study on Health-Promoting Mobile Applications , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[22]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[23]  Sarah Diefenbach,et al.  Transformationale Produkte - Acht Konzepte zum schonenden Umgang mit Ressourcen , 2010, MuC.