FEM modeling of fiber/matrix debond growth in tension-tension cyclic loading of unidirectional composites

The fiber/matrix interface crack (debond) growth from fiber break in unidirectional composite subjected to high stress tension–tension cyclic loading is analyzed. The debond growth is simulated calculating the strain energy release rate GII by FEM in three-dimensional formulation and using power law with respect to the GII change to describe the debond growth rate. Two models were applied. In Model 1 the partially debonded fiber/matrix cylindrical unit with a fiber break is surrounded from all sides by an effective composite phase. In Model 2 the effective composite phase was used around the fiber/matrix unit except the region between the unit and the specimen surface, which contains neat matrix only. Calculations show that the average GII is slightly larger, when the analyzed fiber is closer to the specimen surface. The debond growth was simulated using interface fatigue parameters obtained from single fiber composite specimen tests in the literature. Simulation results show that debonds from fiber breaks close to the specimen surface grow faster than from fiber breaks inside the composite specimen.

[1]  A. Pupurs,et al.  Fracture mechanics analysis of debond growth in a single-fiber composite under cyclic loading , 2011 .

[2]  E. Gamstedt Effects of debonding and fiber strength distribution on fatigue‐damage propagation in carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy , 2000 .

[3]  John A. Nairn,et al.  Experimental verification of the effects of friction and residual stress on the analysis of interfacial debonding and toughness in single fiber composites , 2002 .

[4]  J. Varna,et al.  Unidirectional composite in mechanical fatigue: modelling debond growth from fibre breaks , 2010 .

[5]  T. Peijs,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation into fatigue damage mechanisms in multifibre microcomposites , 2001 .

[6]  R. Christensen,et al.  Solutions for effective shear properties in three phase sphere and cylinder models , 1979 .

[7]  A. Krasņikovs,et al.  Energy Release Rate Based Fiber/Matrix Debond Growth in Fatigue. Part II: Debond Growth Analysis Using Paris Law , 2013 .

[8]  V. Mantič,et al.  Numerical analysis of debond propagation in the single fibre fragmentation test , 2009 .

[9]  T. Chou,et al.  Determination of single fibre strength distribution from fibre bundle testings , 1984 .

[10]  S. Goutianos,et al.  Interface debond crack growth in tension–tension cyclic loading of single fiber polymer composites , 2013 .

[11]  Z. Hashin Analysis of Composite Materials—A Survey , 1983 .

[12]  E. Gamstedt,et al.  Stiffness of Aligned Wood Fiber Composites: Effect of Microstructure and Phase Properties , 2008 .

[13]  R. Talreja,et al.  Fatigue of composite materials: damage mechanisms and fatigue-life diagrams , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[14]  C. V. Singh,et al.  Damage and Failure of Composite Materials: Author index , 2012 .

[15]  Igor Čatić,et al.  Plastics, rubber and composites show Europlast 02 , 2002 .

[16]  Ramesh Talreja,et al.  Fatigue of composite materials , 1987 .

[17]  Andrejs Pupurs,et al.  Energy Release Rate Based Fiber/Matrix Debond Growth in Fatigue. Part I: Self-Similar Crack Growth , 2013 .