Workplace innovation: European policy and theoretical foundation

Workplace innovation is gaining profile as an emerging European policy, creating organisational performance and quality jobs. DG GROW and DG EMPL are leading. Policies regarding work organisation and workplace innovation in the EU over the last 20 years used to be rather fragmented, but more coherence is likely to develop in the near future. Besides social partners and government- and EU-officials a major role was played by European Networks of Applied Researchers. They provided the theories that are part of the foundation of such policies. The evidence for the positive effects of workplace innovation stimulated many entrepreneurs and managers to apply it. National programs appear to be helpful, in particular where coalitions of employers' associations, trade unions, governments and research institutes exist. However, this is still a minority. More research is needed into the obstacles and the mechanism to promote implementation.

[1]  W. Volpert,et al.  Psychological evaluation and design of work tasks: two examples , 1989 .

[2]  Steen Høyrup,et al.  Employee-driven innovation : a new approach , 2012 .

[3]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[4]  Michael Marien,et al.  Book Review: The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies , 2014 .

[5]  W. Hacker.  Action Regulation Theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? , 2003 .

[6]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[7]  Steven Dhondt,et al.  Partners at work? : a report to Europe's policy makers and social partners , 2002 .

[8]  Peter Totterdill,et al.  Social Innovation at Work: Workplace Innovation as a Social Process , 2012 .

[9]  D. Gallie.  Direct participation and the quality of work , 2013 .

[10]  Andreas Mojzisch,et al.  Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand–Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being , 2010 .

[11]  B. Gustavsen.  Dialogue and development: Theory of communication, action research and the restructuring of working life , 1992 .

[12]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[13]  M. Kompier,et al.  Learning new behaviour patterns: A longitudinal test of Karasek's active learning hypothesis among Dutch teachers , 2003 .

[14]  B. Dankbaar,et al.  From Complex Organizations with Simple Jobs to Simple Organizations with Complex Jobs , 1997 .

[15]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Healthy Work : Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life , 1990 .

[16]  M. Sheehan.  Human resource management and performance: Evidence from small and medium-sized firms , 2014 .

[17]  Jan Forslin,et al.  Creating sustainable work systems : emerging perspectives and practice , 2002 .

[18]  D. Gunzburg.  New forms of work organization , 1985 .

[19]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Innovative Workplaces: Making better use of skills within organizations , 2010 .

[20]  P. Cressey,et al.  Workplace Social Dialogue as a Form of 'Productive Reflection' , 2013 .

[21]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  Why Do Management Practices Differ across Firms and Countries ? , 2010 .

[22]  P. Brödner,et al.  Sources of innovation and competitiveness: National programmes supporting the development of work organisation , 2003 .

[23]  Raphael Kaplinsky,et al.  Europe's Next Step: Organisational Innovation, Competition and Employment , 1995 .

[24]  A. Bergman.  Book review symposium: Åke Sandberg (ed.), Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia , 2015 .

[25]  Frank Pot,et al.  Social Innovation of Work and Employment , 2012 .

[26]  Frank Pot,et al.  A review of workplace innovation and its relation with occupational safety and health , 2012 .

[27]  E. Poutsma,et al.  EUROPEAN FOUNDATION for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions , 1999 .

[28]  Frank Pot,et al.  Workplace innovation in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[29]  P. Stone,et al.  It’s All about Control , 2012 .

[30]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[31]  S. Stansfeld,et al.  Work Characteristics and Personal Social Support as Determinants of Subjective Well-Being , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  Frank Pot.  Workplace innovation for better jobs and performance , 2011 .

[33]  C. Cashman.  [European agency for safety and health at work]. , 2013, Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales.

[34]  Elise Ramstad,et al.  Promoting performance and the quality of working life simultaneously , 2009 .

[35]  K. Kraan,et al.  The Importance of Organizational Level Decision Latitude for Well-being and Organizational Commitment: , 2014 .

[36]  Paulien M Bongers,et al.  Different mechanisms to explain the reversed effects of mental health on work characteristics. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[37]  Piet Bolwijn,et al.  Flexible manufacturing : integrating technological and social innovation , 1986 .

[38]  P. Bongers,et al.  "The very best of the millennium": longitudinal research and the demand-control-(support) model. , 2003, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[39]  George A. Akerlof.  Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange , 1982 .

[40]  P. Preenen,et al.  Workplace Innovation in European Companies , 2015 .

[41]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model of burnout. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  C. Hulten,et al.  How Do You Measure a "Technological Revolution"? , 2010 .

[43]  L. U. D. Sitter,et al.  Synergetisch produceren : human resources mobilisation in de produktie: een inleiding in structuurbouw , 2000 .